The Contribution of the Israeli Trauma System to the Survival of Road Traffic Casualties

Background: According to the World Health Organization, over one million people die annually from traffic crashes, in which over half are pedestrians, bicycle riders and two-wheel motor vehicles. In Israel, during the last decade, mortality from traffic crashes has decreased from 636 in 1998 to 288 in 2011. Professionals attribute the decrease in mortality to enforcement, improved infrastructure and roads and behavioral changes among road users, while no credit is given to the trauma system. Trauma systems which care for severe and critical casualties improve the injury outcomes and reduce mortality among road casualties. Goals: 1) To evaluate the contribution of the Israeli Health System, especially the trauma system, on the reduction in mortality among traffic casualties. 2) To evaluate the chance of survival among hospitalized traffic casualties, according to age, gender, injury severity and type of road user. Methods: A retrospective study based on the National Trauma Registry, 1998–2011, including hospitalization data from eight hospitals. Outcomes: During the study period, the Trauma Registry included 262,947 hospitalized trauma patients, of which 25.3% were due to a road accident. During the study period, a 25% reduction in traffic related mortality was reported, from 3.6% in 1998 to 2.7% in 2011. Among severe and critical (ISS 16+) casualties the reduction in mortality rates was even more significant, 41%; from 18.6% in 1998 to 11.0% in 2011. Among severe and critical pedestrian injuries, a 44% decrease was reported (from 29.1% in 1998 to 16.2% in 2011) and a 65% reduction among bicycle injuries. During the study period, the risk of mortality decreased by over 50% from 1998 to 2011 (OR 0.44 95% 0.33–0.59. In addition, a simulation was conducted to determine the impact of the trauma system on mortality of hospitalized road casualties. Presuming that the mortality rate remained constant at 18.6% and without any improvement in the trauma system, in 2011 there would have been 182 in-hospital deaths compared to the actual 108 traffic related deaths. A 41% difference was noted between the actual number of deaths and the expected number. Conclusions: This study clearly shows that without any improvement in the health system, specifically the trauma system, the number of traffic deaths would be considerably greater. Although the health system has a significant contribution on reducing mortality, it does not receive the appropriate acknowledgment or resources for its proportion in the fight against traffic accidents.

[1]  Barbara Langland-Orban,et al.  Assessing effectiveness of a mature trauma system: Association of trauma center presence with lower injury mortality rate. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  F P Rivara,et al.  Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury-related mortality: a national evaluation. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  A C Marson,et al.  The influence of prehospital trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. , 2001, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  D. Cooper,et al.  Management deficiencies and death preventability of road traffic fatalities before and after a new trauma care system in Victoria, Australia. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  F P Rivara,et al.  The effect of organized systems of trauma care on motor vehicle crash mortality. , 2000, JAMA.

[6]  C. Cayten,et al.  Fatality Analysis Reporting System demonstrates association between trauma system initiatives and decreasing death rates. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Seungok Lee,et al.  Organization of Maximum Surgical Blood Order Schedule (MSBOS) according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) , 2008 .

[8]  Alan C Elliott,et al.  Effect of trauma systems on motor vehicle occupant mortality: A comparison between states with and without a formal system. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  Tamitza Toroyan,et al.  Global status report on road safety , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[10]  M. Durkin,et al.  Geographic analysis of traffic injury in Wisconsin: impact on case fatality of distance to level I/II trauma care. , 2005, WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin.

[11]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. Peleg,et al.  Reduction in trauma mortality in Israel during the last decade (2000-2010): the impact of changes in the trauma system. , 2013, Injury.

[13]  D. Trunkey,et al.  Preventable trauma deaths. A review of trauma care systems development. , 1985, JAMA.

[14]  E Thoburn,et al.  System care improves trauma outcome: patient care errors dominate reduced preventable death rate. , 1993, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[15]  N. Mann,et al.  Preferential benefit of implementation of a statewide trauma system in one of two adjacent states. , 1997, Journal of Trauma.

[16]  R. Cales Trauma mortality in Orange County: the effect of implementation of a regional trauma system. , 1984, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  Kobi Peleg,et al.  Increased survival among severe trauma patients: the impact of a national trauma system. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[18]  J. Sampalis,et al.  Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  D. Chang,et al.  Injured patients have lower mortality when treated by "full-time" trauma surgeons vs. surgeons who cover trauma "part-time". , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[20]  P. H. Brakenbury,et al.  The treatment of isolated fractures of the ulnar shaft in adults. , 1981, Injury.

[21]  Joseph S. Pliskin,et al.  A geographic information system simulation model of EMS: reducing ambulance response time. , 2004, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[22]  T. Scalea,et al.  Trauma mortality in mature trauma systems: are we doing better? An analysis of trauma mortality patterns, 1997-2008. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.