MRI-PET Correlation in Three Dimensions Using a Volume-of-Interest (VOI) Atlas

Quantitative interpretation of functional images (PET or SPECT) is hampered by poor spatial resolution, low counting statistics, and, for many tracers, low contrast between different brain structures of interest. Furthermore, normal tracer distributions can be severely disrupted by such gross pathologies as stroke, tumor, and dementia. Hence, the complementary anatomical information provided by CT or MRI is essential for accurate and reproducible regional analysis of functional data. We have developed methods for the simultaneous three-dimensional display and analysis of image volumes from MRI and PET. A general algorithm for defining the affine transformation between two equivalent point ensembles has been adapted for the purpose of registering MRI and PET image volumes by means of a simple fiducial arrangement. In addition, we have extended previous MRI-based computerized atlas methodology to three dimensions. The native atlas planes were spaced at 2 mm intervals, sufficient axial sampling to permit the generation of oblique planar sections through the atlas space. This will allow for an infinite number of angulations and axial offsets in two-dimensional region-of-interest (ROI) templates, all derived from the same master three-dimensional volume-of-interest (VOI) atlas and therefore maintaining topographical consistency throughout. These ROI templates may be selected to match the image orientation for conventional two-dimensional segmentation and data extraction.

[1]  R. Bajcsy,et al.  A computerized system for the elastic matching of deformed radiographic images to idealized atlas images. , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anatomical-Functional Correlative Analysis Of The Human Brain Using Three Dimensional Imaging Systems , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[3]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Assessment of Goals and Obstacles in Data Acquisition and Analysis from Emission Tomography: Report of a Series of International Workshops , 1987, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Mapping Brain Function To Brain Anatomy , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Three-Dimensional Computerized Brain Atlas For Elastic Matching: Creation And Initial Evaluation , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[7]  A. M. Sendyk,et al.  Performance Figures and Images from the Therascan 3128 Positron Emission Tomograph , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  P. Schönemann,et al.  A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem , 1966 .

[9]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Display of surfaces from volume data , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[10]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Computer Reconstruction from Surface Contours for Head CT Examinations , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  H. Kretschmann,et al.  Neuroanatomy and Cranial Computed Tomography , 1986 .

[12]  R. Kessler,et al.  Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anatomical-Functional Correlation Using an Adjustable MRI-Based Region of Interest Atlas with Positron Emission Tomography , 1988, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[14]  A. Alavi,et al.  The [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Method for the Measurement of Local Cerebral Glucose Utilization in Mane , 1979, Circulation research.

[15]  T. Greitz,et al.  Adjustable computerized stereotaxic brain atlas for transmission and emission tomography. , 1983, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  M. Raichle,et al.  A Stereotactic Method of Anatomical Localization for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Charles M. Strother,et al.  Atlas of the human brain and the orbit for computed tomography , 1977 .

[18]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 5. Physical–Anatomical Effects , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  Marc Levoy,et al.  Display of surfaces from volume data , 1988, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F‐18)2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose: Validation of method , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[22]  R. Sibson Studies in the Robustness of Multidimensional Scaling: Procrustes Statistics , 1978 .

[23]  E. Hoffman,et al.  TOMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE METABOLIC RATE IN HUMANS WITH (F‐18)2‐FLUORO-2‐DEOXY-D‐GLUCOSE: VALIDATION OF METHOD , 1980, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[25]  M E Phelps,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 6. Effect of Nonuniform Resolution , 1982, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[26]  Thomas W. Sederberg,et al.  Conversion of complex contour line definitions into polygonal element mosaics , 1978, SIGGRAPH.

[27]  C. Nahmias,et al.  Dopamine visualized in the basal ganglia of living man , 1983, Nature.

[28]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  A Volume of Interest (VOI) Atlas for the Analysis of Neurophysiological Image Data , 1989, Medical Imaging.