Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock

Abstract. We performed a series of 12 hydraulic stimulation experiments in a 20m×20m×20m foliated, crystalline rock volume intersected by two distinct fault sets at the Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland. The goal of these experiments was to improve our understanding of stimulation processes associated with high-pressure fluid injection used for reservoir creation in enhanced or engineered geothermal systems. In the first six experiments, pre-existing fractures were stimulated to induce shear dilation and enhance permeability. Two types of shear zones were targeted for these hydroshearing experiments: (i) ductile ones with intense foliation and (ii) brittle–ductile ones associated with a fractured zone. The second series of six stimulations were performed in borehole intervals without natural fractures to initiate and propagate hydraulic fractures that connect the wellbore to the existing fracture network. The same injection protocol was used for all experiments within each stimulation series so that the differences observed will give insights into the effect of geology on the seismo-hydromechanical response rather than differences due to the injection protocols. Deformations and fluid pressure were monitored using a dense sensor network in boreholes surrounding the injection locations. Seismicity was recorded with sensitive in situ acoustic emission sensors both in boreholes and at the tunnel walls. We observed high variability in the seismic response in terms of seismogenic indices, b values, and spatial and temporal evolution during both hydroshearing and hydrofracturing experiments, which we attribute to local geological heterogeneities. Seismicity was most pronounced for injections into the highly conductive brittle–ductile shear zones, while the injectivity increase on these structures was only marginal. No significant differences between the seismic response of hydroshearing and hydrofracturing was identified, possibly because the hydrofractures interact with the same pre-existing fracture network that is reactivated during the hydroshearing experiments. Fault slip during the hydroshearing experiments was predominantly aseismic. The results of our hydraulic stimulations indicate that stimulation of short borehole intervals with limited fluid volumes (i.e., the concept of zonal insulation) may be an effective approach to limit induced seismic hazard if highly seismogenic structures can be avoided.

[1]  F. Amann,et al.  Hydromechanical processes and their influence on the stimulation effected volume: observations from a decameter-scale hydraulic stimulation project , 2020 .

[2]  S. Loew,et al.  Tracking Fluid Flow in Shallow Crustal Fault Zones: 1. Insights From Single‐Hole Permeability Estimates , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[3]  D. Giardini,et al.  Changing Flow Paths Caused by Simultaneous Shearing and Fracturing Observed During Hydraulic Stimulation , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[4]  F. Schopper,et al.  On the Variability of Pressure Propagation During Hydraulic Stimulation Based on Seismic Velocity Observations , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[5]  F. Amann,et al.  Hydro-mechanical processes and their influence on the stimulation effected volume: Observations from a decameter-scale hydraulic stimulation project , 2020 .

[6]  P. Selvadurai Laboratory Insight Into Seismic Estimates of Energy Partitioning During Dynamic Rupture: An Observable Scaling Breakdown , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[7]  F. Amann,et al.  Hydraulic fracture propagation in a heterogeneous stress field in a crystalline rock mass , 2019, Solid Earth.

[8]  P. Selvadurai,et al.  A multi-phasic approach for estimating the Biot coefficient for Grimsel granite , 2019, Solid Earth.

[9]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Managing injection-induced seismic risks , 2019, Science.

[10]  G. Dresen,et al.  Controlling fluid-induced seismicity during a 6.1-km-deep geothermal stimulation in Finland , 2019, Science Advances.

[11]  T. Backers,et al.  STIMTEC - a mine-back experiment in the Reiche Zeche underground laboratory , 2019 .

[12]  Y. Guglielmi,et al.  Energy of injection-induced seismicity predicted from in-situ experiments , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  D. Giardini,et al.  Including seismic risk mitigation measures into the Levelized Cost Of Electricity in enhanced geothermal systems for optimal siting , 2019, Applied Energy.

[14]  A. Greenwood,et al.  Estimation of Fracture Compliance From Attenuation and Velocity Analysis of Full‐Waveform Sonic Log Data , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[15]  F. Amann,et al.  Fault slip and fracture growth revealed by induced seismicity during a decameter-scale hydraulic stimulation experiment , 2019 .

[16]  Kwang Yeom Kim,et al.  How to Reduce Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismicity , 2019, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[17]  F. Amann,et al.  Comprehensive geological dataset describing a crystalline rock mass for hydraulic stimulation experiments , 2018, Scientific Data.

[18]  D. Giardini,et al.  Subsurface Fluid Pressure and Rock Deformation Monitoring Using Seismic Velocity Observations , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[19]  F. Amann,et al.  Stress Measurements for an In Situ Stimulation Experiment in Crystalline Rock: Integration of Induced Seismicity, Stress Relief and Hydraulic Methods , 2018, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[20]  E. Brodsky,et al.  The spatial footprint of injection wells in a global compilation of induced earthquake sequences , 2018, Science.

[21]  G. Dresen,et al.  Insights Into Complex Subdecimeter Fracturing Processes Occurring During a Water Injection Experiment at Depth in Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, Sweden , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[22]  K. Narula Global Energy System and Sustainable Energy Security , 2018, Lecture Notes in Energy.

[23]  C. Cauzzi,et al.  The November 2017 Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake: A possible case of induced seismicity in South Korea , 2018, Science.

[24]  Younghee Kim,et al.  Assessing whether the 2017 Mw 5.4 Pohang earthquake in South Korea was an induced event , 2018, Science.

[25]  D. Giardini,et al.  Transmissivity Changes and Microseismicity Induced by Small‐Scale Hydraulic Fracturing Tests in Crystalline Rock , 2018 .

[26]  J. D. Zechar,et al.  Multicomponent ensemble models to forecast induced seismicity , 2018 .

[27]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  A Systematic Assessment of the Spatiotemporal Evolution of Fault Activation Through Induced Seismicity in Oklahoma and Southern Kansas , 2017 .

[28]  Bozidar Stojadinovic,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of Fluid‐Induced Seismicity , 2017, 1711.09161.

[29]  D Giardini,et al.  Induced seismicity closed-form traffic light system for actuarial decision-making during deep fluid injections , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[30]  A. Deschamps,et al.  Aseismic Motions Drive a Sparse Seismicity During Fluid Injections Into a Fractured Zone in a Carbonate Reservoir , 2017 .

[31]  E. Brodsky,et al.  The 2016 Mw5.1 Fairview, Oklahoma earthquakes: Evidence for long-range poroelastic triggering at >40 km from fluid disposal wells , 2017 .

[32]  M. Saar,et al.  The seismo-hydromechanical behavior during deep geothermal reservoir stimulations: open questions tackled in a decameter-scale in situ stimulation experiment , 2017 .

[33]  D. Giardini,et al.  On the link between stress field and small-scale hydraulic fracture growth in anisotropic rock derived from microseismicity , 2017 .

[34]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Current challenges in monitoring, discrimination, and management of induced seismicity related to underground industrial activities: A European perspective , 2017 .

[35]  Arno Zang,et al.  Hydraulic fracture monitoring in hard rock at 410 m depth with an advanced fluid-injection protocol and extensive sensor array , 2017 .

[36]  Arno Zang,et al.  Keynote: Fatigue Hydraulic Fracturing , 2017 .

[37]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Tailor-made risk governance for induced seismicity of geothermal energy projects: An application to Switzerland , 2017 .

[38]  James A. Smith,et al.  An Adaptable Seismic Data Format , 2016 .

[39]  Kenneth Rehfeldt,et al.  Lessons learned from the pioneering hot dry rock project at Fenton Hill, USA , 2016 .

[40]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  The Fracture-Compliance Method for Picking Closure Pressure From Diagnostic Fracture-Injection Tests (see associated supplementary discussion/reply) , 2016 .

[41]  J. Douglas Zechar,et al.  Validating induced seismicity forecast models—Induced Seismicity Test Bench , 2016, 1609.02793.

[42]  D. Rivet,et al.  Fault structure, stress, or pressure control of the seismicity in shale? Insights from a controlled experiment of fluid‐induced fault reactivation , 2016 .

[43]  Valentin Gischig,et al.  The importance of earthquake interactions for injection‐induced seismicity: Retrospective modeling of the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System , 2016 .

[44]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  Hydraulic Fracturing and Seismicity in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin , 2016 .

[45]  Jean-Paul Ampuero,et al.  Wastewater disposal and earthquake swarm activity at the southern end of the Central Valley, California , 2016 .

[46]  B. Fischer Lessons Learned. , 2016, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[47]  V. Gischig Rupture propagation behavior and the largest possible earthquake induced by fluid injection into deep reservoirs , 2015 .

[48]  Justin L. Rubinstein,et al.  Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity , 2015 .

[49]  Pierre Henry,et al.  Seismicity triggered by fluid injection–induced aseismic slip , 2015, Science.

[50]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Potential of ambient seismic noise techniques to monitor the St. Gallen geothermal site (Switzerland) , 2015 .

[51]  Shawn Maxwell,et al.  Hydraulic fracture energy budget: Insights from the laboratory , 2015 .

[52]  S. Baisch,et al.  Continued Geothermal Reservoir Stimulation Experiments in the Cooper Basin (Australia) , 2015 .

[53]  Valentin Gischig,et al.  Development of connected permeability in massive crystalline rocks through hydraulic fracture propagation and shearing accompanying fluid injection , 2015 .

[54]  Stefan Hirschberg,et al.  Energy from the earth: Deep geothermal as a resource for the future? , 2015 .

[55]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Induced seismicity risk analysis of the 2006 Basel, Switzerland, Enhanced Geothermal System project: Influence of uncertainties on risk mitigation , 2015 .

[56]  Peter M. Meier,et al.  Lessons Learned from Basel: New EGS Projects in Switzerland Using Multistage Stimulation and a Probabilistic Traffic Light System for the Reduction of Seismic Risk , 2015 .

[57]  Roy Baria,et al.  FLUID-INDUCED SEISMICITY , 2015 .

[58]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  An investigation of stimulation mechanisms in Enhanced Geothermal Systems , 2014 .

[59]  Jeoung Seok Yoon,et al.  Numerical investigation on optimized stimulation of intact and naturally fractured deep geothermal reservoirs using hydro-mechanical coupled discrete particles joints model , 2014 .

[60]  D. Lockner,et al.  Preslip and cascade processes initiating laboratory stick slip , 2014 .

[61]  H. Kawakata,et al.  Magnitude −7 level earthquakes: A new lower limit of self‐similarity in seismic scaling relationships , 2014 .

[62]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  Correlations between formation properties and induced seismicity during high pressure injection into granitic rock , 2014 .

[63]  R. Young,et al.  A laboratory acoustic emission experiment under in situ conditions , 2014 .

[64]  A. McGarr Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection , 2014 .

[65]  Hiroshi Ogasawara,et al.  Frequency–Magnitude Distribution of −3.7 ≤ MW ≤ 1 Mining-Induced Earthquakes Around a Mining Front and b Value Invariance with Post-Blast Time , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[66]  W. Ellsworth Injection-Induced Earthquakes , 2013, Science.

[67]  Reinhard Jung EGS — Goodbye or Back to the Future 95 , 2013 .

[68]  Roland Horne,et al.  IS PURE SHEAR STIMULATION ALWAYS THE MECHANISM OF STIMULATION IN EGS? , 2013 .

[69]  Reinhard Jung,et al.  EGS — Goodbye or Back to the Future , 2013 .

[70]  Vivi Thomas Hriscu,et al.  Mining the Earth's Heat: Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Energy , 2012 .

[71]  Fabio Moia,et al.  A survey of the induced seismic responses to fluid injection in geothermal and CO2 reservoirs in Europe , 2012 .

[72]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[73]  G. Dresen,et al.  Source Parameters of Picoseismicity Recorded at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications for Scaling Relations , 2011 .

[74]  R. Horne,et al.  Investigation of injection-induced seismicity using a coupled fluid flow and rate/state friction model , 2011 .

[75]  C. Dinske Interpretation of fluid-induced seismicity at geothermal and hydrocarbon reservoirs of Basel and Cotton Valley , 2011 .

[76]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of the Spatially Varying Completeness Magnitude of Earthquake Catalogs , 2010 .

[77]  S. Ingebritsen,et al.  Permeability of the Continental Crust: Dynamic Variations Inferred from Seismicity and Metamorphism , 2010 .

[78]  Friedemann Wenzel,et al.  Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations , 2010 .

[79]  O. Heidbach,et al.  Fluid-induced microseismicity in pre-stressed rock masses , 2010 .

[80]  N. Davatzes,et al.  Stress, Fracture, and Fluid-flow Analysis Using Acoustic and Electrical Image Logs in Hot Fractured Granites of the Coso Geothermal Field, California, U.S.A. , 2010 .

[81]  Hisao Ito,et al.  Passive Seismic Monitoring of Natural and Induced Earthquakes: Case Studies, Future Directions and Socio-Economic Relevance , 2009 .

[82]  Markus Häring,et al.  Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system , 2008 .

[83]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  3D Scene Reconstruction through a Fusion of Passive Video and Lidar Imagery , 2007, 36th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (aipr 2007).

[84]  Albert Genter,et al.  Permeability creation and damage due to massive fluid injections into granite at 3.5 km at Soultz: 1. Borehole observations , 2005 .

[85]  Hiroaki Niitsuma,et al.  Microseismicity and permeability enhancement of hydrogeologic structures during massive fluid injections into granite at 3 km depth at the Soultz HDR site , 2004 .

[86]  W. Marzocchi,et al.  A review and new insights on the estimation of the b-valueand its uncertainty , 2003 .

[87]  K. Aki,et al.  Quantitative Seismology, 2nd Ed. , 2002 .

[88]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Characterization of fluid transport properties of reservoirs using induced microseismicity , 2002 .

[89]  M. Wyss,et al.  Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan , 2000 .

[90]  F. Cornet,et al.  Seismic and Aseismic Slips Induced by Large-scale Fluid Injections , 1997 .

[91]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[92]  K. Holliger,et al.  Attenuation of broad-band (50–1500 Hz) seismic waves in granitic rocks near the Earth’ surface , 1996 .

[93]  M. Zoback,et al.  Fluid flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rock: Geology , 1995 .

[94]  ENERGY FOR EARTH , 1991 .

[95]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  In-situ stress orientation and magnitude at the Fenton Geothermal Site, New Mexico, determined from , 1988 .

[96]  Michael Fehler,et al.  Stress control of seismicity patterns observed during hydraulic fracturing experiments at the Fenton Hill hot dry rock geothermal energy site, New Mexico , 1987 .

[97]  L. Thomsen Weak elastic anisotropy , 1986 .

[98]  R. J. Pine,et al.  Downward migration of shearing in jointed rock during hydraulic injections , 1984 .

[99]  J. Boatwright,et al.  Detailed spectral analysis of two small New York state earthquakes , 1978 .

[100]  J. Brune Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes , 1970 .

[101]  C. Fairhurst,et al.  In-Situ Stress Determination At Great Depth By Means Of Hydraulic Fracturing , 1969 .