Biomedical materials for new millennium: perspective on the future

Abstract Millions of orthopaedic prostheses made of bioinert materials have been implanted with an excellent 15 year survivability of 75–85%. Improved metal alloys, special polymers, and medical grade ceramics are the basis for this success, which has enhanced the quality of life for millions of patients. However, an increasing percentage of our aging population require greater than 30 years survivability of the devices. It is proposed that to satisfy this growing need for very long term orthopaedic repair a paradigm shift is needed; a shift in emphasis from the replacement of tissues to the regeneration of tissues. Such a shift from a materials and mechanics approach to tissue repair requires an increase in the understanding and utilisation of biologically approaches. Two new biologically orientated alternatives in biomaterials for orthopaedics in the new millennium are discussed: tissue regeneration, where in situ repair is initiated in the host tissue, and tissue engineering, where repair is initiated in vitro on cellularly seeded scaffolds and then transplanted to the recipient. The concept of the use of class A bioactive materials to stimulate the regeneration of trabecular bone is described along with clinical applications. Eleven reaction stages lead to the enhanced proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts and the recreation of trabecular bone architecture. Recent results showing the effects of microchemical gradients on the genetic activation of bone cells are related to the molecular design of hierarchical bioactive resorbable scaffolds for the tissue engineering of bone constructs.

[1]  M. Vallet‐Regí,et al.  Influence of composition and surface characteristics on the in vitro bioactivity of SiO(2)-CaO-P(2)O(5)-MgO sol-gel glasses. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  R. Latour,et al.  Real-time dissolution measurement of sized and unsized calcium phosphate glass fibers. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Panjian Li,et al.  The electrochemistry of a glass surface and its application to bioactive glass in solution , 1990 .

[4]  L. Hench,et al.  Mechanisms of hydroxyapatite formation on porous gel-silica substrates , 1996 .

[5]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  The polymer PolyactiveTM as a bone-filling substance: an experimental study in rabbits , 1998 .

[6]  J. Livage,et al.  Immunoassays in sol-gel matrices , 1996 .

[7]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Comparative bone growth behavior in granules of bioceramic materials of various sizes. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Molecular Control of Bioactivity in Sol-Gel Glasses , 1998 .

[9]  G. Daculsi,et al.  Apatite precipitation after incubation of biphasic calcium-phosphate ceramic in various solutions: influence of seed species and proteins. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  L. Hench Sol-gel materials for bioceramic applications , 1997 .

[11]  J. Mackenzie,et al.  Bioactivity of sol–gel derived organically modified silicates: Part I: In vitro examination , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[12]  J. Polak,et al.  Bioactive materials to control cell cycle , 2000 .

[13]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Particulate Bioglass Compared With Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Graft Substitute , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  P. Hatton,et al.  Influence of sodium oxide content on bioactive glass properties , 1999, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[15]  P Ducheyne,et al.  Bioactive ceramics: the effect of surface reactivity on bone formation and bone cell function. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[16]  R. W. Douglas,et al.  Reactions of Glasses with Aqueous Solutions , 1967 .

[17]  John V. Walther,et al.  Dissolution kinetics of silica glass as a function of pH between 40 and 85°C , 1994 .

[18]  C. Sanchez,et al.  Sol-gel chemistry , 1992 .

[19]  A. Clark,et al.  Effect of Texture on the Rate of Hydroxyapatite Formation on Gel-Silica Surface , 1995 .

[20]  Sridhar Komarneni,et al.  Porous Materials: Process technology and applications , 1998 .

[21]  Bioceramics , 2022, An Introduction to Biomaterials Science and Engineering.

[22]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  The Biomedical Engineering Handbook , 1995 .

[23]  A. Södergård,et al.  Solubility and film formation of phosphate and alumina containing silicate glasses , 1999 .

[24]  P. Ducheyne,et al.  BIOACTIVE GLASS PARTICLES OF NARROW SIZE RANGE: A NEW MATERIAL FOR THE REPAIR OF BONE DEFECTS , 1993, Implant dentistry.

[25]  R. Hill An alternative view of the degradation of bioglass , 1996 .

[26]  J. Livage,et al.  Sol-gel processes , 1997 .

[27]  A. Clark,et al.  Calcium phosphate formation on sol-gel-derived bioactive glasses in vitro. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  L. Hench,et al.  The sol-gel process , 1990 .

[29]  D. Clark,et al.  Corrosion of glass , 1979 .

[30]  W. Lanford,et al.  Reaction of water with glass: influence of a transformed surface layer , 1983 .

[31]  Ilhan A. Aksay,et al.  Biomaterials is this really a field of research , 1998 .

[32]  L L Hench,et al.  An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol-gel processing. , 1991, Journal of applied biomaterials : an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials.