Motion or activity: their role in intra- and inter-subject variation in fMRI

Functional MRI (fMRI) carries the potential for non-invasive measurements of brain activity. Typically, what are referred to as activation images are actually thresholded statistical parametric maps. These maps possess large inter-session variability. This is especially problematic when applying fMRI to pre-surgical planning because of a higher requirement for intra-subject precision. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of residual movement artefacts on intra-subject and inter-subject variability in the observed fMRI activation. Ten subjects were examined using three different word-generation tasks. Two of the subjects were examined 10 times on 10 different days using the same paradigms. We systematically investigated one approach of correcting for residual movement effects: the inclusion of regressors describing movement-related effects in the design matrix of a General Linear Model (GLM). The data were analysed with and without modeling the residual movement artefacts and the impact on inter-session variance was assessed using F-contrasts. Inclusion of motion parameters in the analysis significantly reduced both the intra-subject as well as the inter-subject-variance.

[1]  R. Cox,et al.  Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[3]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Working Memory for Location and Time: Activity in Prefrontal Area 46 Relates to Selection Rather than Maintenance in Memory , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  C. Genovese,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging I: Statistical methodology , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Theory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human absence seizures , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[10]  A. Holmes Generalisability, random effects and population inference (abstract) , 1998 .

[11]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Graeme M. Bydder,et al.  fMRI: does correlation imply activation? , 1995, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  E T Bullmore,et al.  Effect of slice orientation on reproducibility of fMRI motor activation at 3 Tesla. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  T. V. van Erp,et al.  Reproducibility of visual activation in functional MR imaging and effects of postprocessing. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[17]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[18]  S. Strother,et al.  Reproducibility of BOLD‐based functional MRI obtained at 4 T , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A General Statistical Analysis for fMRI Data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[20]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A general statistical analysis for fMRI data , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[22]  N. Andreasen,et al.  Anatomic and Functional Variability: The Effects of Filter Size in Group fMRI Data Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[24]  Abraham Z Snyder,et al.  Reliability of functional localization using fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[25]  D. Gitelman,et al.  On the Use of Caffeine as a Contrast Booster for BOLD fMRI Studies , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  J M Taveras,et al.  Magnetic Resonance in Medicine , 1991, The Western journal of medicine.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  Evaluating subject specific preprocessing choices in multisubject fMRI data sets using data-driven performance metrics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Mixed-effects and fMRI studies , 2005, NeuroImage.