Study of cross-correlation signals in a data-driven approach for damage classification in aircraft wings

This paper discusses, experimental results of classifying several mass adding in a wing aircraft structure, using cross-correlated piezoelectric signals, represented by principal components. Piezoelectric signals are applied and recorded at specific points of the structure under analysis. Then, statistical features are obtained by means of principal component analysis to the correlation between excitation and response signals. Unsupervised learning is implemented to the reduced feature space, in order to identify clusters of damaged cases. The main result of this paper is the advantage resulting from using cross-correlated signals, evaluated through the performance of clustering indexes. Experimental data are collected from two test structures: i.) A turbine blade of a commercial aircraft and ii.) The skin panel of the torsion box of a wing. Damages are induced adding masses at different locations of the wing section surface. The results obtained show the effectiveness of the methodology to distinguish between different damage cases.

[1]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring , 2007 .

[2]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[3]  Diego Alexander Tibaduiza Burgos,et al.  Principal component analysis vs. independent component analysis for damage detection , 2013 .

[4]  Anindya Ghoshal,et al.  STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING OF AN AIRCRAFT JOINT , 2003 .

[5]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Algorithm Based on Principal Component Indexes and Embedded on a Real Time Platform , 2014 .

[6]  Nobuo Takeda,et al.  Development of damage monitoring system for aircraft structure using a PZT actuator/FBG sensor hybrid system , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[7]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures , 2011 .

[8]  Diego Alexander,et al.  Design and validation of a structural health monitoring system for aeronautical structures. , 2013 .

[9]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  : Exploratory data analysis with MATLAB ® , 2007 .

[10]  Tadeusz Stepinski,et al.  Design of piezoelectric transducers for health monitoring of composite aircraft structures , 2007, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  L. Mujica,et al.  Damage detection by using FBGs and strain field pattern recognition techniques , 2013 .

[13]  José Rodellar,et al.  Partial least square/projection to latent structures (PLS) regression to estimate impact localization in structures , 2013 .

[14]  Douglas E. Adams,et al.  Health monitoring of structural materials and components : methods with applications , 2007 .

[15]  Yang Weiwei,et al.  Design and Experiment of PZT Network-based Structural Health Monitoring Scanning System , 2009 .

[16]  Fahit Gharibnezhad Robust damage detection in smart structures , 2014 .

[17]  Anindya Ghoshal,et al.  Experimental Damage Detection on a Wing Panel Using Vibration Deflection Shapes , 2003 .