Recovery of Isostatic Topography over North America from Topographic and CHAMP Gravity Correlations

[1]  P. Taylor,et al.  Reliability of CHAMP Anomaly Continuations , 2005 .

[2]  D. Eaton,et al.  Upper-mantle thermochemical structure below North America from seismic–geodynamic flow models , 2003 .

[3]  R. Frese,et al.  Comprehensive mass modeling of the Moon from spectrally correlated free-air and terrain gravity data , 2003 .

[4]  C. Reigber,et al.  First champ mission results for gravity, magnetic and atmospheric studies , 2003 .

[5]  John C. Ries,et al.  Determination of CHAMP Accelerometer Calibration Parameters , 2003 .

[6]  D. Eaton,et al.  LITH5.0: a revised crustal model for Canada based on Lithoprobe results , 2002 .

[7]  T. James,et al.  New constraints on Laurentide postglacial rebound from absolute gravity measurements , 2001 .

[8]  W. Peltier,et al.  Subcontinental mantle dynamics: A further analysis based on the joint constraints of dynamic surface topography and free‐air graviy , 2000 .

[9]  P. Silver,et al.  Dynamic topography, plate driving forces and the African superswell , 1998, Nature.

[10]  M. Wysession,et al.  Mantle discontinuities and temperature under the North American continental keel , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Gabi Laske,et al.  CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5° , 1998 .

[12]  Bradford H. Hager,et al.  Localization of the gravity field and the signature of glacial rebound , 1997, Nature.

[13]  J. Mitrovica.  Geophysics: Going halves over Hudson Bay , 1997, Nature.

[14]  J. W. Kim,et al.  Spectral correlation of magnetic and gravity anomalies of Ohio , 1997 .

[15]  W. Peltier,et al.  Dynamic surface topography: A new interpretation based upon mantle flow models derived from seismic tomography , 1993 .

[16]  T. James.  The Hudson Bay free‐air gravity anomaly and glacial rebound , 1992 .