Comment on “explicit collapse and superluminal signals”

[1]  I. Bloch,et al.  Some Relativistic Oddities in the Quantum Theory of Observation , 1967 .

[2]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  States and observables in relativistic quantum field theories , 1980 .

[3]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  Can we make sense out of the measurement process in relativistic quantum mechanics , 1981 .

[4]  Observer dependence of quantum states in relativistic quantum field theories , 1982 .

[5]  P. Pearle.  Experimental tests of dynamical state-vector reduction , 1984 .

[6]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[7]  The puzzling entanglement of Schrödinger's wave function , 1988 .

[8]  L. Vaidman,et al.  On a proposed postulate of state-reduction , 1989 .

[9]  Pearle,et al.  Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[10]  Michael Barr,et al.  The Emperor's New Mind , 1989 .

[11]  GianCarlo Ghirardi,et al.  Relativistic dynamical reduction models: General framework and examples , 1990 .

[12]  Pearle,et al.  Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[13]  Dynamical models for state-vector reduction: do they ensure that measurements have outcomes? , 1991 .

[14]  Wavefunction collapse and ultraviolet photons , 1991 .

[15]  E. Squires.  Explicit collapse and superluminal signals , 1992 .