When are concepts comparable across minds?

[1]  William H. Batchelder,et al.  Cultural Consensus Theory: Comparing different concepts of cultural truth , 2012 .

[2]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  Conceptual agreement theory , 2012 .

[3]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Concepts and categories: Memory, meaning, and metaphysics , 2012 .

[4]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Quantitative modeling of the neural representation of objects: How semantic feature norms can account for fMRI activation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Conversation, Gaze Coordination, and Beliefs About Visual Context , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[7]  H. Glock Concepts: Where Subjectivism Goes Wrong , 2009, Philosophy.

[8]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Concepts , 2008, 0803.2567.

[10]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  B. Ross,et al.  The importance of being coherent: Category coherence, cross-classification, and reasoning , 2006 .

[12]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Performance Measurement : Current Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2006 .

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[15]  P. Converse The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics , 2004 .

[16]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. , 2001, Child development.

[18]  F. Pleijel,et al.  A new taxon, capricornia (Hesionidae, Polychaeta), illustrating the LITU (‘Least‐Inclusive Taxonomic Unit’) concept , 2000 .

[19]  G. Rouse,et al.  Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Robert A. Wilson Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays , 1999 .

[21]  B. Mishler,et al.  Getting Rid of Species , 1999 .

[22]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. , 1998, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[23]  Michael J. Miller,et al.  Distributional Ratings of Performance: More Evidence for a New Rating Format , 1997 .

[24]  H. Dawah,et al.  Species :the units of biodiversity , 1997 .

[25]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Timothy J. Brazill,et al.  Culture as shared cognitive representations. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty , 1996, Cognition.

[28]  F. Ashby,et al.  Categorization as probability density estimation , 1995 .

[29]  C. Moore,et al.  Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .

[30]  M. Tomasello Joint attention as social cognition. , 1995 .

[31]  Dirk D. Steiner,et al.  Distributional ratings of performance: Further examination of a new rating format. , 1993 .

[32]  U. Neisser Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization , 1989 .

[33]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Test theory without an answer key , 1988 .

[34]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[35]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts , 1987 .

[36]  H. Brownell,et al.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  L Hasher,et al.  Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.

[38]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[39]  J. Hampton Polymorphous Concepts in Semantic Memory , 1979 .

[40]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[41]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  H. Putnam Meaning and Reference , 1973 .

[44]  K. Popper,et al.  Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. , 1975 .

[45]  N. Henley A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms , 1969 .

[46]  D. Apter,et al.  Ideology and discontent , 1966 .

[47]  M. Black,et al.  Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege , 1953 .

[48]  G. Frege On Sense and Reference , 1948 .

[49]  Tudor S. G. Jones,et al.  Theories of Memory , 1925 .