Risk reduction by use of passie fire protection - A study regarding implementation of new installations offshore

The offshore industry means high risk activities on a daily basis and with a location far away from solid ground and handling large amount of flammable substances, these are two strong reasons that make it important to keep a high level of safety onboard. One of these safety measures is passive fire protection (PFP), in this report this means the surface coating (Chartek) protecting the load bearing structure, which is used extensively in this industry. A common way of handling issues concerning the protection of load bearing structures is to apply PFP because it always has been applied and often without examining the necessity regarding the risks that apply for a given section or new installation. This thesis studies risk reduction by use of passive fire protection for new offshore installations or modifications. To investigate this issue further an installation of a new low pressure production module has been used as a base for this work. The different risk levels for the installation with PFP is compared to the same installation without PFP and this difference is quantified. The quantification is made due to the interest of presenting the PFP risk reduction in numerical figures. Depending on how to measure the risk level difference, the risk reduction differs. Risk reduction, when taking the ignition probability into consideration as well as making a cost-benefit analysis for the implementation, shows that the use of PFP is not cost effective.

[1]  Erik Sjöberg Brandteknisk dimensionering av stålkonstruktioner vid termisk och mekanisk samberkan med betong. , 2004 .

[2]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Structural Design for Fire Safety , 2001 .

[3]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  Design of Steel Structures subjected to Fire. Background and Design Guide to Eurocode 3. , 2005 .

[4]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[5]  Hеvard Devold,et al.  Oil And Gas Production Handbook , 2006 .

[6]  J. Wang,et al.  Offshore Safety Assessment and Safety-Based Decision-Making—The Current Status and Future Aspects , 2000 .

[7]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  F K Crawley,et al.  Safety, health or the environment--which comes first? , 2002, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Krister Hjalte,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life in Transport: Findings from a New Contingent Valuation Study in Sweden , 2001 .

[10]  P J Rew,et al.  Off-site ignition probability of flammable gases. , 2000, Journal of hazardous materials.

[11]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Revised fire consequence models for offshore quantitative risk assessment , 2005 .

[12]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the Ethical Justification for the Use of Risk Acceptance Criteria , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..