On the Evaluation of a Coupled Sequential Approach for Rotorcraft Landing Simulation

Maximum loads acting on aircraft structures generally arise when the aircraft is undergoing some form of acceleration, such as during landing. Landing, especially when considering rotorcrafts, is thus crucial in determining the operational load spectrum, and accurate predictions on the actual health/load level of the rotorcraft structure cannot be achieved unless a database comprising the structural response in various landing conditions is available. An effective means to create a structural response database relies on the modeling and simulation of the items and phenomena of concern. The structural response to rotorcraft landing is an underrated topic in the open scientific literature, and tools for the landing event simulation are lacking. In the present work, a coupled sequential simulation strategy is proposed and experimentally verified. This approach divides the complex landing problem into two separate domains, namely a dynamic domain, which is ruled by a multibody model, and a structural domain, which relies on a finite element model (FEM). The dynamic analysis is performed first, calculating a set of intermediate parameters that are provided as input to the subsequent structural analysis. Two approaches are compared, using displacements and forces at specific airframe locations, respectively, as the link between the dynamic and structural domains.

[1]  R. J. Melosh,et al.  Computer Simulation of Light Aircraft Crash , 1977 .

[2]  Claudio Sbarufatti,et al.  Helicopter Harsh Landing Events: A Computational Hybrid Methodology to Estimate Fuselage Damage , 2013 .

[3]  K. H. Lyle,et al.  Full-scale crash test and simulation of a composite helicopter , 2001 .

[4]  Lucas G. Horta,et al.  Comparison of Test and Finite Element Analysis for Two Full-Scale Helicopter Crash Tests , 2013 .

[5]  Karen H. Lyle,et al.  Application of Probability Methods to Assess Airframe Crash Modeling Uncertainty , 2007 .

[6]  Keng Goh,et al.  Modelling and control of helicopter robotic landing gear for uneven ground conditions , 2017, 2017 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS).

[7]  Mark Costello,et al.  Rotorcraft Hard Landing Mitigation Using Robotic Landing Gear , 2016 .

[8]  Benjamin Milwitzky,et al.  Analysis of Landing-Gear Behavior , 1953 .

[9]  Norman A Merritt AIRCRAFT CRASH SURVIVAL DESIGN GUIDE. , 1989 .

[10]  James Ma,et al.  Fatigue Life Estimation of Helicopter Landing Probe Based on Dynamic Simulation , 2009 .

[11]  Robert G. Thomson,et al.  Designing for Aircraft Structural Crashworthiness , 1982 .

[12]  Johnson,et al.  Efficient Helicopter Skid Landing Gear Dynamic Drop Simulation Using LS-DYNA , 2003 .

[13]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Dieter Kohlgrüber,et al.  Validation of Numerical Simulation of Composite Helicopter Sub-floor Structures Under Crash Loading , 1998 .

[15]  M. A. McCarthy,et al.  Numerical investigation of a crash test of a composite helicopter subfloor structure , 2001 .

[16]  Claudio Sbarufatti,et al.  Model-based structural integrity assessment of helicopter fuselage during harsh landing , 2015 .

[17]  Karen E. Jackson,et al.  Simulation of Aircraft Landing Gears with a Nonlinear Dynamic Finite Element Code , 2002 .

[18]  Lin Liao,et al.  A Study of Inertia Relief Analysis , 2011 .

[19]  J. D. Cronkhite,et al.  Crash Simulation of Composite and Aluminum Helicopter Fuselages Using a Finite Element Program , 1980 .

[20]  Christian Boller,et al.  Fatigue in aerostructures—where structural health monitoring can contribute to a complex subject , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  Karen E. Jackson,et al.  Full-Scale Crash Test of a MD-500 Helicopter with Deployable Energy Absorbers , 2010 .

[22]  Robert G. Thomson,et al.  NASA/FAA General Aviation Crash Dynamics Program - A Status Report , 1980 .

[23]  David Crist,et al.  Helicopter Landing Gear Design and Test Criteria Investigation , 1981 .

[24]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Structural health monitoring of helicopter hard landing using 3D digital image correlation , 2010, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[25]  Robert J. Hayduk,et al.  Survey of NASA research on crash dynamics , 1984 .

[26]  Oliver Tivadar Sagi,et al.  Capacitive transducer for condition based maintenance after harsh landing events , 2011, 2011 IEEE AUTOTESTCON.

[27]  Wieslaw J. Staszewski,et al.  Validation and Verification of a Hard Landing Indication System for Aircraft Landing Gear , 2009 .

[28]  Gian Luca Ghiringhelli,et al.  A Multibody Approach to the Analysis of Helicopter-Terrain Interaction , 2002 .

[29]  R. K. Schmidt,et al.  CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF A HARD LANDING INDICATION SYSTEM USING A FLIGHT PARAMETER SENSOR SIMULATION MODEL , 2010 .

[30]  S. Levy,et al.  Influence of wing flexibility on force-time relation in shock strut following vertical landing impact , 1949 .

[31]  Edwin L. Fasanella,et al.  Development of a Scale Model Composite Fuselage Concept for Improved Crashworthiness , 2001 .

[32]  L. Lanzi,et al.  Design of skid landing gear by means of multi-body optimisation , 2006 .

[33]  K. H. Lyle,et al.  A History of Full-Scale Aircraft and Rotorcraft Crash Testing and Simulation at NASA Langley Research Center , 2004 .

[34]  Yvonne T. Fuchs,et al.  Vertical Drop Testing and Analysis of the Wasp Helicopter Skid Gear , 2008 .

[35]  Claudio Sbarufatti,et al.  Experimental Validation of a Computational Hybrid Methodology to Estimate Fuselage Damage Due to Harsh Landing , 2016 .