Aerosol scattering and absorption during the EUCAARI-LONGREX flights of the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) BAe-146: can measurements and models agree?

Abstract. Scattering and absorption by aerosol in anthropogenically perturbed air masses over Europe has been measured using instrumentation flown on the UK's BAe-146-301 large Atmospheric Research Aircraft (ARA) operated by the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) on 14 flights during the EUCAARI-LONGREX campaign in May 2008. The geographical and temporal variations of the derived shortwave optical properties of aerosol are presented. Values of single scattering albedo of dry aerosol at 550 nm varied considerably from 0.86 to near unity, with a campaign average of 0.93 ± 0.03. Dry aerosol optical depths ranged from 0.030 ± 0.009 to 0.24 ± 0.07. An optical properties closure study comparing calculations from composition data and Mie scattering code with the measured properties is presented. Agreement to within measurement uncertainties of 30% can be achieved for both scattering and absorption, but the latter is shown to be sensitive to the refractive indices chosen for organic aerosols, and to a lesser extent black carbon, as well as being highly dependent on the accuracy of the absorption measurements. Agreement with the measured absorption can be achieved either if organic carbon is assumed to be weakly absorbing, or if the organic aerosol is purely scattering and the absorption measurement is an overestimate due to the presence of large amounts of organic carbon. Refractive indices could not be inferred conclusively due to this uncertainty, despite the enhancement in methodology compared to previous studies that derived from the use of the black carbon measurements. Hygroscopic growth curves derived from the wet nephelometer indicate moderate water uptake by the aerosol with a campaign mean f(RH) value (ratio in scattering) of 1.5 (range from 1.23 to 1.63) at 80% relative humidity. This value is qualitatively consistent with the major chemical components of the aerosol measured by the aerosol mass spectrometer, which are primarily mixed organics and nitrate and some sulphate.

[1]  Douglas R. Worsnop,et al.  Laboratory and Ambient Particle Density Determinations using Light Scattering in Conjunction with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry , 2007 .

[2]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[3]  P. Quinn,et al.  Local closure during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1): Aerosol mass concentration and scattering and backscattering coefficients , 1998 .

[4]  Hugh Coe,et al.  A curved multi-component aerosol hygroscopicity model framework: Part 1 Inorganic compounds , 2005 .

[5]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Optical closure for an aerosol column: Method, accuracy, and inferable properties applied to a biomass‐burning aerosol and its radiative forcing , 2002 .

[6]  T. Bond,et al.  Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review , 2006 .

[7]  Yinon Rudich,et al.  The density of humic acids and humic like substances ( HULIS ) from fresh and aged wood burning and pollution aerosol particles , 2018 .

[8]  Owen B. Toon,et al.  The optical constants of several atmospheric aerosol species: Ammonium sulfate, aluminum oxide, and sodium chloride , 1976 .

[9]  Hugh Coe,et al.  Simplification of the representation of the organic component of atmospheric particulates. , 2005, Faraday discussions.

[10]  M. Schnaiter,et al.  Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers , 2003 .

[11]  J. Ogren.  Comment on “Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols” , 2010 .

[12]  P. Hamill,et al.  Dependence of Aerosol Light Absorption and Single-Scattering Albedo On Ambient Relative Humidity for Sulfate Aerosols with Black Carbon Cores , 2001 .

[13]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  Humidification factors for atmospheric aerosols off the mid‐Atlantic coast of the United States , 1999 .

[14]  A. Slingo,et al.  Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model , 1996 .

[15]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Vertical variability of aerosol properties observed at a continental site during the Lindenberg Aerosol Characterization Experiment (LACE 98) , 2002 .

[16]  Olivier Boucher,et al.  Aerosol absorption and radiative forcing , 2006 .

[17]  R. C. Weast.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .

[18]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Particle scattering, backscattering, and absorption coefficients: An in situ closure and sensitivity study , 2002 .

[19]  C E Kolb,et al.  Guest Editor: Albert Viggiano CHEMICAL AND MICROPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF AMBIENT AEROSOLS WITH THE AERODYNE AEROSOL MASS SPECTROMETER , 2022 .

[20]  G. Leeuw,et al.  Overview of the synoptic and pollution situation over Europe during the EUCAARI-LONGREX field campaign , 2010 .

[21]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[22]  B. Johnson,et al.  Physical and optical properties of mineral dust aerosol measured by aircraft during the GERBILS campaign , 2011 .

[23]  I. Tang.  Chemical and size effects of hygroscopic aerosols on light scattering coefficients , 1996 .

[24]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Black carbon measurements in the boundary layer over western and northern Europe , 2010 .

[25]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  How well do State-of-the-Art Techniques Measuring the Vertical Profile of Tropospheric Aerosol Extinction Compare? , 2006 .

[26]  M. Petters,et al.  Influences on the fraction of hydrophobic and hydrophilic black carbon in the atmosphere , 2011 .

[27]  M. Esselborn,et al.  Enhancement of the aerosol direct radiative effect by semi-volatile aerosol components: airborne measurements in North-Western Europe , 2010 .

[28]  W. Maenhaut,et al.  Aerosol mass closure and reconstruction of the light scattering coefficient over the Eastern Mediterranean Sea during the MINOS campaign , 2005 .

[29]  Jonathan Crosier,et al.  © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics A revised linear ozone photochemistry parameterization for use in transport and general circulation models: multi-annual simulations , 2006 .

[30]  R. Washington,et al.  Optical properties of Saharan dust aerosol and contribution from the coarse mode as measured during the Fennec 2011 aircraft campaign , 2012 .

[31]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[32]  Y. Rudich,et al.  The complex refractive index of atmospheric and model humic-like substances (HULIS) retrieved by a cavity ring down aerosol spectrometer (CRD-AS). , 2008, Faraday discussions.

[33]  M. Stephens,et al.  Particle identification by laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity. , 2003, Applied optics.

[34]  P. Quinn,et al.  Modification, Calibration and a Field Test of an Instrument for Measuring Light Absorption by Particles , 2005 .

[35]  David S. Covert,et al.  Bias in Filter-Based Aerosol Light Absorption Measurements Due to Organic Aerosol Loading: Evidence from Ambient Measurements , 2008 .

[36]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[37]  P. Formenti,et al.  A comparison of aerosol optical and chemical properties over the Adriatic and Black Seas during summer 2004: Two case‐studies from ADRIEX , 2007 .

[38]  K. Prather,et al.  In-situ measurements of the mixing state and optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing estimates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. T. Wang,et al.  Scattering of electromagnetic waves by composite spherical particles: experiment and effective medium approximations. , 1988, Applied optics.

[40]  A. Minikin,et al.  Particle sizing calibration with refractive index correction for light scattering optical particle counters and impacts upon PCASP and CDP data collected during the Fennec campaign , 2012 .

[41]  Steven Businger,et al.  An overview of the Lagrangian experiments undertaken during the North Atlantic regional Aerosol Characterisation Experiment (ACE-2) , 2000 .

[42]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Single‐particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere , 2006 .

[43]  J. Haywood,et al.  Prediction of visibility and aerosol within the operational Met Office Unified Model. II: Validation of model performance using observational data , 2008 .

[44]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Calibration and Intercomparison of Filter-Based Measurements of Visible Light Absorption by Aerosols , 1999 .

[45]  J. Haywood,et al.  In situ and remote‐sensing measurements of the mean microphysical and optical properties of industrial pollution aerosol during ADRIEX , 2007 .

[46]  P. Zieger,et al.  Measurement of relative humidity dependent light scattering of aerosols , 2009 .

[47]  Yong Cai,et al.  Comparison of measured and calculated scattering from surface aerosols with an average, a size‐dependent, and a time‐dependent refractive index , 2011 .

[48]  E. Highwood,et al.  Airborne measurements of the spatial distribution of aerosol chemical composition across Europe and evolution of the organic fraction , 2010 .

[49]  J. Penner,et al.  Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling , 2005 .

[50]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Black carbon aerosol mixing state, organic aerosols and aerosol optical properties over the United Kingdom , 2011 .