Asexual evolution waves: fluctuations and universality

In large asexual populations, multiple beneficial mutations arise in the population, compete, interfere with each other, and accumulate on the same genome, before any of them fix. The resulting dynamics, although studied by many authors, is still not fully understood, fundamentally because the effects of fluctuations due to the small numbers of the fittest individuals are large even in enormous populations. In this paper, branching processes and various asymptotic methods for analyzing the stochastic dynamics are further developed and used to obtain information on fluctuations, time dependence, and the distributions of sizes of subpopulations, jumps in the mean fitness, and other properties. The focus is on the behavior of a broad class of models: those with a distribution of selective advantages of available beneficial mutations that falls off more rapidly than exponentially. For such distributions, many aspects of the dynamics are universal?quantitatively so for extremely large populations. On the most important time scale that controls coalescent properties and fluctuations of the speed, the dynamics is reduced to a simple stochastic model that couples the peak and the high-fitness ?nose? of the fitness distribution. Extensions to other models and distributions of available mutations are discussed briefly.

[1]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Dynamic Mutation–Selection Balance as an Evolutionary Attractor , 2012, Genetics.

[2]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Molecular Characterization of Clonal Interference during Adaptive Evolution in Asexual Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[3]  C. Wilke,et al.  The traveling-wave approach to asexual evolution: Muller's ratchet and speed of adaptation. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[4]  E. Brunet,et al.  Noisy traveling waves: Effect of selection on genealogies , 2006 .

[5]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  The Speed of Evolution and Maintenance of Variation in Asexual Populations , 2007, Current Biology.

[6]  C. Hellström,et al.  Affecting the Future , 2001 .

[7]  A. Etheridge,et al.  Asymptotic behavior of the rate of adaptation , 2007, 0708.3453.

[8]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Clonal Interference, Multiple Mutations and Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations , 2008, Genetics.

[9]  Kessler,et al.  RNA virus evolution via a fitness-space model. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[10]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals. , 2000, Genetics.

[11]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  N. Barton Linkage and the limits to natural selection. , 1995, Genetics.

[13]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  David Holcman,et al.  Time scale of diffusion in molecular and cellular biology , 2014 .

[15]  Gergely J. Szöllősi,et al.  Emergent Neutrality in Adaptive Asexual Evolution , 2011, Genetics.

[16]  J. Coffin,et al.  The solitary wave of asexual evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Genetic Diversity and the Structure of Genealogies in Rapidly Adapting Populations , 2012, Genetics.

[18]  Marcus W Feldman,et al.  The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  B. Derrida,et al.  Effect of selection on ancestry: an exactly soluble case and its phenomenological generalization. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations. , 2003, Genetics.

[21]  Oskar Hallatschek,et al.  The noisy edge of traveling waves , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  H. A. Orr,et al.  A General Extreme Value Theory Model for the Adaptation of DNA Sequences Under Strong Selection and Weak Mutation , 2008, Genetics.

[23]  D. Hartl,et al.  An Equivalence Principle for the Incorporation of Favorable Mutations in Asexual Populations , 2006, Science.

[24]  B. Derrida,et al.  Quasi-Stationary Regime of a Branching Random Walk in Presence of an Absorbing Wall , 2007, 0710.3689.

[25]  H. A. Orr,et al.  THE POPULATION GENETICS OF ADAPTATION: THE ADAPTATION OF DNA SEQUENCES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  J. Krug,et al.  Clonal interference in large populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  B. Shraiman,et al.  Fluctuations of Fitness Distributions and the Rate of Muller’s Ratchet , 2012, Genetics.

[28]  R. Lenski,et al.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population , 2004, Genetica.

[29]  J. Krug,et al.  The Speed of Evolution in Large Asexual Populations , 2009, 0910.0219.

[30]  Michael M. Desai,et al.  Beneficial Mutation–Selection Balance and the Effect of Linkage on Positive Selection , 2006, Genetics.

[31]  B. Shraiman,et al.  Rate of Adaptation in Large Sexual Populations , 2010, Genetics.

[32]  John H.Gillespie Population Genetics: A Concise Guide , 1997 .

[33]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  The Speed of Adaptation in Large Asexual Populations , 2004, Genetics.

[34]  Claus O Wilke,et al.  The Stochastic Edge in Adaptive Evolution , 2007, Genetics.