A Second Decade Lifetable Survival Analysis of the Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe role of unicompartmental arthroplasty in managing osteoarthritis of the knee remains controversial. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty employs a fully congruent mobile bearing intended to reduce wear and increase the lifespan of the implant. Long-term second decade results are required to establish if the design aim can be met.Questions/purposesWe report the (1) 20-year survivorship for the Oxford mobile bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; (2) reasons for the revisions; and (3) time to revision.MethodsWe reviewed a series of 543 patients who underwent 682 medial Oxford meniscal bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties performed between 1983 and January 2005. The mean age at implantation was 69.7 years (range, 48–94 years). The median followup was 5.9 years (range, 0.5 to 22 years). One hundred and forty-one patients (172 knees) died. None were lost to followup. The primary outcome was 20-year survival, a key variable in assessing the longevity of arthroplasty.ResultsThe 16-year all cause revision cumulative survival rate was 91.0% (CI 6.4, 71 at risk) and survival was maintained to 20 years (91.0%, CI 36.2, 14 at risk). There had been 29 revision procedures: 10 for lateral arthrosis, nine for component loosening, five for infection, two bearing dislocations, and three for unexplained pain. In addition, five patients had undergone bearing exchange, four for dislocation and one for bearing fracture. The mean time to revision was 3.3 years (range, 0.3–8.9 years).ConclusionsMobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is durable during the second decade after implantation.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[1]  J. Insall,et al.  A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R S Laskin,et al.  Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  L. Marmor Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  L. Marmor Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after 'Oxford' medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  J. Callaghan,et al.  THE JOHN INSALL AWARD: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: A Minimum Twenty-One-Year Followup, End-Result Study , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  D W Murray,et al.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after 'Oxford' medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? , 1999 .

[10]  A. Price,et al.  Long-term Clinical Results of the Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  D W Murray,et al.  Survival analysis of joint replacements. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  J W Goodfellow,et al.  Theory and Practice of Meniscal Knee Replacement: Designing against Wear , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  R. Laskin Unicompartmental knee replacement: some unanswered questions. , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  D W Murray,et al.  Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  J. Galante,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  S. Weinstein,et al.  The natural history and long-term follow-up of Scheuermann kyphosis. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.