Australian superannuation (pension) fund product ratings and performance: A guide for fund managers

This paper investigates the ability of Morningstar superannuation fund ratings to predict future performance in the context of the Australian superannuation fund industry. In this context, we make provisions for fund size and fund age. We draw three broad conclusions. First, fund ratings can assist in predicting funds that are likely to significantly underperform in subsequent periods. Second, the ratings are mostly unable to distinguish between highly and moderately performing funds. Third, the likelihood of a fund being highly rated is negatively related to the size of assets under management and positively related to its age. Accordingly, the paper should be of benefit not only to fund managers seeking to identify underperforming funds, but also to fund advisers, retail investors, and trustee boards choosing SF products for investment choice menus.

[1]  K. Brown,et al.  Superannuation Choice: The Pivotal Role of the Default Option , 2004 .

[2]  Paul Gerrans,et al.  Morningstar Ratings and Future Performance , 2006 .

[3]  Peter Tufano,et al.  Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows , 1998 .

[4]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[5]  Are Australian Investors Smart? , 2008 .

[6]  On the Choice of Superannuation Funds in Australia , 2006 .

[7]  Kiss of Death: A 5-Star Morningstar Mutual Fund Rating? , 2003 .

[8]  P. Gerrans.  Retirement savings investment choices in response to the global financial crisis: Australian evidence , 2010 .

[9]  M. C. Jensen.  The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964 , 1967 .

[10]  R. Heaney,et al.  Will Investors Change their Superannuation Fund Given the Choice? , 2007 .

[11]  I. Walter,et al.  Rating Agencies: Is There an Agency Issue? , 2001 .

[12]  M. Brennan.  THE INDIVIDUAL INVESTOR , 1995 .

[13]  R. MoreyMatthew,et al.  Mutual Fund Age and Morningstar Ratings , 2006 .

[14]  M. Morey,et al.  Mutual Fund Age and Morningstar Ratings , 2000 .

[15]  Christopher R. Blake,et al.  Morningstar Ratings and Mutual Fund Performance , 1999, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[16]  Rankings for Australian managed funds: Contrariness and performance index failure , 2009 .

[17]  R. FraserDon,et al.  Reading the Stars: Age Bias in Morningstar Ratings , 2003 .

[18]  William N. Goetzmann,et al.  COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND MUTUAL FUND INVESTORS , 1997 .

[19]  B. Newell,et al.  Just Interested or Getting Involved? An Analysis of Superannuation Attitudes and Actions , 2013 .

[20]  J. R. Cummings.  Effect of Fund Size on the Performance of Australian Superannuation Funds , 2015 .

[21]  A. Khorana,et al.  The Determinants and Predictive Ability of Mutual Fund Ratings , 1998 .

[22]  R. Faff,et al.  Fund Flows, MERs and Managed Fund Ratings Initiations , 2006 .

[23]  Matthew R. Morey,et al.  Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings Redux , 2006 .

[24]  P. Gerrans.  Australian Managed Fund Ratings and Individual Investors , 2004 .

[25]  P. Gerrans,et al.  Asset Allocation and Age Effects in Retirement Savings Choices , 2009 .

[26]  A Timmermann,et al.  Performance clustering and incentives in the UK pension fund industry , 2002 .

[27]  J. Sawicki,et al.  Evaluating managed fund performance using conditional measures: Australian evidence , 2000 .

[28]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency , 1993 .

[29]  O. Mitchell,et al.  New evidence on pension plan design and administrative expenses: the Australian experience , 2004, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance.

[30]  Mark M. Carhart.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[31]  A. Coleman,et al.  THE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE OF AUSTRALIAN SUPERANNUATION FUNDS , 2003 .

[32]  A. Worthington.  Knowledge and Perceptions of Superannuation in Australia , 2008 .