T Cells Compete for Access to Antigen-Bearing Antigen-Presenting Cells
暂无分享,去创建一个
Philippa Marrack | Ross M. Kedl | Brian Schaefer | P. Marrack | J. Kappler | David A Hildeman | T. Mitchell | R. Kedl | John Kappler | B. Schaefer | William A. Rees | David A. Hildeman | Tom Mitchell | W. Rees
[1] U. Storb,et al. Progress in understanding the mechanism and consequences of somatic hypermutation , 1998, Immunological reviews.
[2] D. Busch,et al. T Cell Affinity Maturation by Selective Expansion during Infection , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[3] A. Khoruts,et al. In Vivo Detection of Dendritic Cell Antigen Presentation to CD4+ T Cells , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[4] P. Marrack,et al. Detection of antigen-specific T cells with multivalent soluble class II MHC covalent peptide complexes. , 1998, Immunity.
[5] M. Davis,et al. Antigen-specific development of primary and memory T cells in vivo. , 1995, Science.
[6] L. Bradley,et al. T cell memory. , 1998, Annual review of immunology.
[7] B. Diamond,et al. Revisiting and revising suppressor T cells. , 1992, Immunology today.
[8] M. Taussig. Antigenic competition. , 1973, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.
[9] K. Rajewsky. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system , 1996, Nature.
[10] D. Fremont,et al. Soluble class I MHC with beta2-microglobulin covalently linked peptides: specific binding to a T cell hybridoma. , 1999, Journal of immunology.
[11] L. Michaelis. Untersuchungen über Eiweisspräzipitine , 1902 .
[12] J. Bennink,et al. The response to H-2-different virus-infected cells is mediated by long-lived T lymphocytes and is diminished by prior virus priming in a syngeneic environment. , 1981, Cellular immunology.
[13] D. Pardoll,et al. In vivo priming of two distinct antitumor effector populations: the role of MHC class I expression , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[14] J. Cyster. Signaling thresholds and interclonal competition in preimmune B‐cell selection , 1997, Immunological reviews.
[15] D. Margulies,et al. Determinant selection of major histocompatibility complex class I- restricted antigenic peptides is explained by class I-peptide affinity and is strongly influenced by nondominant anchor residues , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[16] N. Mitchison. Specialization, tolerance, memory, competition, latency, and strife among T cells. , 1992, Annual review of immunology.
[17] Klas Kärre,et al. T cell competition for the antigen‐presenting cell as a model for immunodominance in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte response against minor histocompatibility antigens , 1999, European journal of immunology.
[18] W Chen,et al. Dissecting the multifactorial causes of immunodominance in class I-restricted T cell responses to viruses. , 2000, Immunity.
[19] R. Ahmed,et al. T cell memory. Long-term persistence of virus-specific cytotoxic T cells , 1989, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[20] R. O'hara. Antigen-specific suppressor factor: Missing pieces in the puzzle , 1995, Immunologic research.
[21] S. Kienle,et al. Self-MHC-restricted peptides recognized by an alloreactive T lymphocyte clone. , 1996, Journal of immunology.
[22] J. Yewdell,et al. Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide-MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody. , 1997, Immunity.
[23] S. Jameson,et al. Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. , 1999, Immunity.
[24] P. Marrack,et al. Bystander virus infection prolongs activated T cell survival. , 1999, Journal of immunology.
[25] M. Jackson,et al. TCR-Mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. , 1999, Science.
[26] P. Marrack,et al. An inverse relationship between T cell receptor affinity and antigen dose during CD4(+) T cell responses in vivo and in vitro. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[27] S. Jameson,et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection , 1996, Nature.
[28] P. Grufman,et al. Immunodominance in the CTL response against minor histocompatibility antigens: interference between responding T cells, rather than with presentation of epitopes. , 1998, Journal of immunology.
[29] D. Wraith,et al. Lowering the tone: mechanisms of immunodominance among epitopes with low affinity for MHC. , 1996, Immunology today.
[30] M. Davis,et al. A kinetic basis for T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. , 1999, Immunity.
[31] J. Yewdell,et al. MHC affinity, peptide liberation, T cell repertoire, and immunodominance all contribute to the paucity of MHC class I-restricted peptides recognized by antiviral CTL. , 1997, Journal of immunology.
[32] P. Fink,et al. Identification of conserved T cell receptor CDR3 residues contacting known exposed peptide side chains from a major histocompatibility complex class I‐bound determinant , 1993, European journal of immunology.
[33] Kristin A. Hogquist,et al. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection , 1994, Cell.
[34] R. Anderson,et al. Antigen processing in vivo and the elicitation of primary CTL responses. , 1995, Journal of immunology.
[35] L. Michaelis. Weitere Untersuchungen über Eiweißpräzipitine , 1904 .