Analysis of a minimal Rho-GTPase circuit regulating cell shape

Networks of Rho-family GTPases regulate eukaryotic cell polarization and motility by controlling assembly and contraction of the cytoskeleton. The mutually inhibitory Rac-Rho circuit is emerging as a central, regulatory hub that can affect the shape and motility phenotype of eukaryotic cells. Recent experimental manipulation of the amounts of Rac and Rho or their regulators (guanine nucleotide-exchange factors, GTPase-activating proteins, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors) have been shown to bias the prevalence of these different states and promote transitions between them. Here we show that part of this data can be understood in terms of inherent Rac-Rho mutually inhibitory dynamics. We analyze a spatio-temporal mathematical model of Rac-Rho dynamics to produce a detailed set of predictions of how parameters such as GTPase rates of activation and total amounts affect cell decisions (such as Rho-dominated contraction, Rac-dominated spreading, and spatially segregated Rac-Rho polarization). We find that in some parameter regimes, a cell can take on any of these three fates depending on its environment or stimuli. We also predict how experimental manipulations (corresponding to parameter variations) can affect cell shapes observed. Our methods are based on local perturbation analysis (a kind of nonlinear stability analysis), and an approximation of nonlinear feedback by sharp switches. We compare the Rac-Rho model to an even simpler single-GTPase ('wave-pinning') model and demonstrate that the overall behavior is inherent to GTPase properties, rather than stemming solely from network topology.

[1]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  The three-way switch operation of Rac1/RhoA GTPase-based circuit controlling amoeboid-hybrid-mesenchymal transition , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Navigating through models of chemotaxis. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[3]  Kazuo Kishimoto,et al.  The spatial homogeneity of stable equilibria of some reaction-diffusion systems on convex domains , 1985 .

[4]  Chris Bakal,et al.  Cross-talk between Rho and Rac GTPases drives deterministic exploration of cellular shape space and morphological heterogeneity , 2014, Open Biology.

[5]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Local perturbation analysis: a computational tool for biophysical reaction-diffusion models. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Synthetic spatially graded Rac activation drives cell polarization and movement , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Mathematical Model for Spatial Segregation of the Rho-Family GTPases Based on Inhibitory Crosstalk , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[8]  D. Odde,et al.  Potential for Control of Signaling Pathways via Cell Size and Shape , 2006, Current Biology.

[9]  E. Sahai,et al.  Rac Activation and Inactivation Control Plasticity of Tumor Cell Movement , 2008, Cell.

[10]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  A model for intracellular actin waves explored by nonlinear local perturbation analysis. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  A. Ridley,et al.  Rho family proteins: coordinating cell responses. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[12]  Willy Govaerts,et al.  MATCONT: A MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs , 2003, TOMS.

[13]  Bob Goldstein,et al.  The PAR proteins: fundamental players in animal cell polarization. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[14]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Monotone and near-monotone biochemical networks , 2007, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[16]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Interaction of Motility, Directional Sensing, and Polarity Modules Recreates the Behaviors of Chemotaxing Cells , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  A Comparison of Computational Models for Eukaryotic Cell Shape and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  Chris Bakal,et al.  Apolar and polar transitions drive the conversion between amoeboid and mesenchymal shapes in melanoma cells , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Signaling pathways that control cell migration: models and analysis , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[20]  W. Rappel,et al.  Modeling self-organized spatio-temporal patterns of PIP3 and PTEN during spontaneous cell polarization , 2014, Physical biology.

[21]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[22]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Paola Chiarugi,et al.  Rac and Rho GTPases in cancer cell motility control , 2010, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[24]  W. Rappel,et al.  Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Designing Synthetic Regulatory Networks Capable of Self-Organizing Cell Polarization , 2012, Cell.

[26]  T. Shibata,et al.  Bifurcation analysis of a self-organizing signaling system for eukaryotic chemotaxis , 2015 .

[27]  William R Holmes,et al.  An Efficient, Nonlinear Stability Analysis for Detecting Pattern Formation in Reaction Diffusion Systems , 2012, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[28]  C. Bakal,et al.  Quantitative Morphological Signatures Define Local Signaling Networks Regulating Cell Morphology , 2007, Science.

[29]  Marten Postma,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling modules join hands at front and tail , 2004, EMBO reports.

[30]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Asymptotic and Bifurcation Analysis of Wave-Pinning in a Reaction-Diffusion Model for Cell Polarization , 2010, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[31]  M. Volkenstein,et al.  Positional differentiation as pattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems with permeable boundaries. Bifurcation analysis , 1981 .

[32]  James J. Feng,et al.  A biomechanical model for cell polarization and intercalation during Drosophila germband extension , 2015, Physical biology.

[33]  J. McLeod,et al.  The approach of solutions of nonlinear diffusion equations to travelling front solutions , 1977 .

[34]  Qing Nie,et al.  Computational modelling of epidermal stratification highlights the importance of asymmetric cell division for predictable and robust layer formation , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[35]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Supporting Text S1: Influence of cell shape, inhomogeneities and diffusion barriers in cell polarization models , 2015 .

[36]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho protein crosstalk: another social network? , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[37]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Modelling Cell Polarization Driven by Synthetic Spatially Graded Rac Activation , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  K. Page,et al.  A gene regulatory motif that generates oscillatory or multiway switch outputs , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A genetically-encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells , 2009, Nature.

[40]  A. Verkhovsky Cell Polarization: Mechanical Switch for a Chemical Reaction , 2012, Current Biology.

[41]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  From simple to detailed models for cell polarization , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  M. Hirsch,et al.  Prevalent Behavior of Strongly Order Preserving Semiflows , 2006, math/0605202.

[43]  Chin-Jen Ku,et al.  Identifying network motifs that buffer front-to-back signaling in polarized neutrophils. , 2013, Cell reports.

[44]  Alan Rick Horwitz,et al.  Signaling networks that regulate cell migration. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[45]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion , 2009, Nature.

[46]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells , 2008, Nature.

[47]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Two complementary, local excitation, global inhibition mechanisms acting in parallel can explain the chemoattractant-induced regulation of PI(3,4,5)P3 response in dictyostelium cells. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Jingsong Xu,et al.  Divergent Signals and Cytoskeletal Assemblies Regulate Self-Organizing Polarity in Neutrophils , 2003, Cell.

[49]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  How Cells Integrate Complex Stimuli: The Effect of Feedback from Phosphoinositides and Cell Shape on Cell Polarization and Motility , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  Neil O Carragher,et al.  Bistability in the Rac1, PAK, and RhoA Signaling Network Drives Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics and Cell Motility Switches , 2016, Cell systems.

[51]  L Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Regimes of wave type patterning driven by refractory actin feedback: transition from static polarization to dynamic wave behaviour , 2012, Physical biology.

[52]  J. Segall,et al.  Rac and Rho driving tumor invasion: who's at the wheel? , 2009, Genome Biology.

[53]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  The topology design principles that determine the spatiotemporal dynamics of G-protein cascades. , 2012, Molecular Biosystems.

[54]  Shuji Ishihara,et al.  A Mass Conserved Reaction–Diffusion System Captures Properties of Cell Polarity , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Modeling the roles of protein kinase Cβ and η in single-cell wound repair , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[56]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  A Screen for Morphological Complexity Identifies Regulators of Switch-like Transitions between Discrete Cell Shapes , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.