Irrigation Water Management of Horticultural Crops

WP by increasing yield and/or reducing ET always results in net savings, thus reducing agricultural water requirements. This is a key point in assessing the opportunities for true water savings in horticultural crop cultivation and will be addressed in detail later in this paper. Water productivity in irrigated agriculture varies widely and depends on many biophysical and management factors. Because variations in ET among crops are within an order of magnitude apart, by far the most important factor infl uencing WP is the economic value of the product. Horticultural products are usually high value and thus WP normally exceeds that of fi eld and row (agronomic) crops. For example, using current values for yield and ET characteristic of California agriculture, the WP of corn is about 0.20 $/m3, compared to 0.70 $/m3 for almond, 5.00 $/m3 for strawberry, and even more for greenhouse and ornamental crops. An extreme example of this occurs with vegetable crops grown under plastic in southeast Spain during the off-season. The combination of high market prices and low ET leads to a WP of about 10 $/m3. While impressive, even this value cannot compete with that of industrial and urban uses. Nevertheless, it helps explain the trend of shifting irrigated acreage from low value fi eld and row crops to horticultural crops in many water-scarce areas of the US, a trend that will probably increase worldwide (National Research Council, 1996). Indeed, the WP of an irrigation district in Southern Spain increased over a four year period as the proportion of horticultural crops increased (I. Lorite, L. Mateos, and E. Fereres, unpublished data). This paper describes the evolution of water use as related to productivity with an emphasis on the U.S. experience, analyzes how irrigation systems and management have evolved since the early 1900s, and explores the challenges and opportunities for water conservation in horticulture. Because of the broad scope of the subject and limited space, the paper focuses primarily on tree crops although many principles are applicable to all horticultural crops.

[1]  D. Chalmers,et al.  Control of peach tree growth and productivity by regulated water supply, tree density, and summer pruning [Trickle irrigation] , 1981 .

[2]  T. Hsiao Measurements of plant water status. , 1990 .

[3]  David Seckler,et al.  The new era of water resources management: from "dry" to "wet" water , 1996 .

[4]  P. Dry,et al.  Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  F. Veihmeyer Some factors affecting the irrigation requirements of deciduous orchards , 1927 .

[6]  D. Goldberg,et al.  The Distribution of Roots, Water and Minerals as a Result of Trickle Irrigation1 , 1971, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[7]  Elías Fereres,et al.  Soil evaporation from drip-irrigated olive orchards , 2001, Irrigation Science.

[8]  S. Southwick,et al.  Deficit irrigation strategies using midday stem water potential in prune , 2001, Irrigation Science.

[9]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Deficit Irrigation to Control Vegetative Growth in Apple and Monitoring Fruit Growth to Schedule Irrigation , 1995 .

[10]  C. Crisosto,et al.  EFFECTS OF REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION AND PARTIAL ROOT ZONE DRYING ON LATE HARVEST PEACH TREE PERFORMANCE , 2002 .

[11]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Yield Responses of a Mature Olive Orchard to Water Deficits , 2003 .

[12]  T. A. Wheaton,et al.  High Application Rates of Reclaimed Water Benefit Citrus Tree Growth and Fruit Production , 2001 .

[13]  Luca Testi,et al.  Measurement and modeling of evapotranspiration of olive (Olea europaea L.) orchards , 2000 .

[14]  F. Veihmeyer THE AVAILABILITY OF SOIL MOISTURE TO PLANTS: RESULTS OF EMPIRICAL EXPERIMENTS WITH FRUIT TREES , 1972 .

[15]  R. B. Hutmacher,et al.  Water-fertilizer management of processing tomatoes. , 1990 .

[16]  S. L. Rawlins,et al.  Irrigation Management for Salt Control , 1974 .

[17]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[18]  Janine Hasey,et al.  Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees , 1997 .

[19]  M. Jensen,et al.  Scheduling Irrigations Using Climate-Crop-Soil Data , 1970 .

[20]  J. Girona,et al.  Patterns of Soil and Tree Water Status and Leaf Functioning during Regulated Deficit Irrigation Scheduling in Peach , 1993 .

[21]  H. Meidner Stomatal control of transpirational water loss. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[22]  D. Chalmers,et al.  Responses of ‘Bartlett’ Pear to Withholding Irrigation, Regulated Deficit Irrigation, and Tree Spacing , 1989, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[23]  J. Y. Lorendeau,et al.  Specific micromorphometric reactions of fruit trees to water stress and irrigation scheduling automation , 1992 .

[24]  David Guillet,et al.  A New Era for Irrigation , 1998 .

[25]  R. G. Evans,et al.  Irrigation Management, Fruit Quality, and Storage Life of Apple , 1984, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[26]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[27]  T. Howell Enhancing Water Use Efficiency in Irrigated Agriculture , 2001 .

[28]  E. Fereres,et al.  Evapotranspiration losses of tomatoes under drip and furrow irrigation , 1984 .

[29]  S. Idso,et al.  Wheat canopy temperature: A practical tool for evaluating water requirements , 1977 .

[30]  Robert G. Evans,et al.  Leaf Water Potentials for Management of High Frequency Irrigation on Apples , 1984 .

[31]  Elias Fereres,et al.  Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements , 2001, Irrigation Science.

[32]  Joan Girona,et al.  Evapotranspiration and soil water dynamics of peach trees under water deficits , 2002 .