Are There Qualitative Differences in the Representation of Abstract and Concrete Words? Within-Language and Cross-Language Evidence from the Semantic Priming Paradigm

The different organizational frameworks theory proposes that there is a qualitative difference between the representation of concrete and abstract words in memory: Concrete concepts would be primarily organized in terms of semantic similarity whereas abstract concepts would be mainly organized by their association with other concepts. Evidence in support of this proposal has been mostly obtained with neuropsychological populations and, to a lesser extent, with healthy participants. In the present work, we tested the different organizational frameworks theory by using, for the first time, a semantic priming paradigm both within language and across languages. The results revealed that there was priming for both semantically similar and associative relations when words were concrete. However, with abstract words, priming was only observed when pairs and targets were associated. These results do not support the proposal of Crutch and coworkers, suggesting that the experimental paradigm as well as the type of relations tested may modulate the pattern of effects obtained with concrete and abstract words.

[1]  David A. Medler,et al.  Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Warrington,et al.  The Different Frameworks Underlying Abstract and Concrete Knowledge: Evidence from a Bilingual Patient with a Semantic Refractory Access Dysphasia , 2006, Neurocase.

[3]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  How Different Types of Conceptual Relations Modulate Brain Activation during Semantic Priming , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  E. Warrington,et al.  Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Neurolinguistic evidence for bilingual language representation: a comparison of reaction times and event-related brain potentials , 2001 .

[6]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Cristina Romani,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Concreteness Effects in Different Tasks: Implications for Models of Short-term Memory , 2022 .

[8]  T. Schnur,et al.  The representation of concrete and abstract concepts: categorical versus associative relationships. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Inferring semantic organization from refractory access dysphasia: Further replication in the domains of geography and proper nouns but not concrete and abstract concepts , 2010, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[10]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.

[11]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[13]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  Free-association norms for the Spanish names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[14]  S. Crutch,et al.  Qualitatively Different Semantic Representations for Abstract and Concrete Words: Further Evidence from the Semantic Reading Errors of Deep Dyslexic Patients , 2006, Neurocase.

[15]  K. McRae,et al.  Automatic semantic similarity priming. , 1998 .

[16]  Scott A. Crossley,et al.  Assessing automatic processing of hypernymic relations in first language speakers and advanced second language learners: A semantic priming approach , 2013 .

[17]  Manuel Perea,et al.  EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[18]  Pilar Ferré,et al.  The nature of semantic priming: Effects of the degree of semantic similarity between primes and targets in Spanish , 2006 .

[19]  Lara L. Jones,et al.  Associative, semantic, and thematic infl uences on word recognition , 2012 .

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Semantic and translation priming from a first language to a second and back: Making sense of the findings , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Kerrie E. Elston-Güttler,et al.  The role of proficiency on processing categorical and associative information in the L2 as revealed by reaction times and event-related brain potentials , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[22]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Masked associative/semantic priming effects across languages with highly proficient bilinguals , 2008 .

[24]  A. D. Groot,et al.  Conceptual representation in bilingual memory: Effects of concreteness and cognate status in word association , 1998, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[25]  R. Sánchez-Casas,et al.  Masked and Unmasked Priming Effects as a Function of Semantic Relatedness and Associative Strength , 2012, The Spanish journal of psychology.

[26]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[27]  L. Otten,et al.  Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task , 2013, Brain and Language.

[28]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[29]  J. Kroll,et al.  Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections Between Bilingual Memory Representations , 1994 .

[30]  H. Coslett,et al.  Refractory access disorders and the organization of concrete and abstract semantics: Do they differ? , 2008, Neurocase.

[31]  E. Warrington,et al.  The different representational frameworks underpinning abstract and concrete knowledge: Evidence from odd-one-out judgements , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  K. McRae,et al.  Semantic and associative relations in adolescents and young adults: Examining a tenuous dichotomy. , 2012 .

[33]  S. Crutch,et al.  Contrasting Graded Effects of Semantic Similarity and Association across the Concreteness Spectrum , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  The effect of age of second language acquisition on the representation and processing of second language words , 2004 .

[35]  Alessandro Lenci,et al.  Semantic properties of word associations to Italian verbs , 2007 .

[36]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm , 2009, Cognition.

[37]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  The activation of semantic memory: Effects of prime exposure, prime-target relationship, and task demands , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[38]  E. Warrington,et al.  The differential dependence of abstract and concrete words upon associative and similarity-based information: Complementary semantic interference and facilitation effects , 2010, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  Zaizhu Han,et al.  Are abstract and concrete concepts organized differently? Evidence from the blocked translation paradigm , 2012, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[40]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The Effects of Associative and Semantic Priming in the Lexical Decision Task , 2022 .

[41]  Dana M. Basnight-Brown,et al.  Methodological considerations in performing semantic- and translation-priming experiments across languages , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[42]  M. Lucas,et al.  Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  E. Warrington,et al.  Semantic priming in deep-phonological dyslexia: Contrasting effects of association and similarity upon abstract and concrete word reading , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[44]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Karen Murphy,et al.  The time course of semantic and associative priming effects is different in an attentional blink task , 2013, Cognitive Processing.

[46]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[47]  Boris New,et al.  SEMANTIC AND ASSOCIATIVE PRIMING IN THE MENTAL LEXICON , 2003 .

[48]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The quarterly journal of experimental psychology , 1985 .

[49]  A. D. Groot,et al.  What Is Hard To Learn Is Easy To Forget: The Roles of Word Concreteness, Cognate Status, and Word Frequency in Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting. , 2000 .

[50]  C. Davis,et al.  BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[51]  Roger Boada,et al.  NIM: A Web-based Swiss army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[52]  R. Sánchez-Casas,et al.  Effects of the degree of meaning similarity on cross-language semantic priming in highly proficient bilinguals , 2011 .