Mycotoxin-contaminated diets and an adsorbent affect the performance of Nellore bulls finished in feedlots.

Mycotoxins are present in almost all feedstuffs used in animal nutrition but are often ignored in beef cattle systems, even though they can affect animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of mycotoxins and a mycotoxin adsorbent (ADS) on performance of Nellore cattle finished in a feedlot. One hundred Nellore cattle (430 ± 13 kg) were used in a randomized complete block design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. The factors consisted of two diets with either natural contamination (NC) or exogenous contamination (EC) and the presence (1 g/kg of DM; ADS) or absence of a mycotoxin adsorbent. The NC and EC diets had the following contaminations, respectively: 0.00 and 10.0 µg/kg aflatoxins, 5114 and 5754 µg/kg fumonisins, 0.00 and 42.1 µg/kg trichothecenes B, 0.00 and 22.1 µg/kg trichothecenes A and 42.9 and 42.9 µg/kg fusaric acid. At the beginning of the experiment, all animals were weighed, and four randomly selected animals were slaughtered to evaluate the initial carcass weight. After 97 days of treatment, all animals were weighed and slaughtered. There was no interaction among factors for the DM intake (DMI; P = 0.92); however, there was a tendency for the EC diets to decrease the DMI by 650 g/day compared to animals fed NC diets (P = 0.09). There was a trend for interaction among factors (P = 0.08) for the average daily gain (ADG), where the greatest ADG was observed for cattle fed the NC diet (1.77 kg), and the lowest was observed for those fed the EC diet (1.51 kg). The NC + ADS and EC + ADS treatments presented intermediate values for ADG. The animals fed the NC diet had a greater final BW (596 kg) than animals fed the EC treatment (582 kg; P = 0.04). There was a tendency for interaction among factors for carcass gain (P = 0.08). Similarly to ADG, the highest carcass gain was observed for animals fed the NC diet (1.20 kg), and the lowest was observed for those fed the EC diet (1.05 kg). The NC + ADS and EC + ADS treatments presented intermediate values. The natural contamination groups had greater carcass gain than that of the EC groups, and the use of the ADS recovered part of the weight gain in animals fed the EC diet. In conclusion, mycotoxins at the levels evaluated affected the performance of beef cattle, and adsorbents may mitigate their impact.

[1]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Mycotoxin contamination of diets for beef cattle finishing in feedlot , 2019, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia.

[2]  Shengguo Zhao,et al.  Biological System Responses of Dairy Cows to Aflatoxin B1 Exposure Revealed with Metabolomic Changes in Multiple Biofluids , 2019, Toxins.

[3]  A. Sanches,et al.  Effect of aflatoxin experimental ingestion and Eimeira vaccine challenges on intestinal histopathology and immune cellular dynamic of broilers: applying an Intestinal Health Index , 2016, Poultry science.

[4]  B. Kim,et al.  Evaluation of a mycotoxin adsorbent in swine diets containing barley naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins , 2016 .

[5]  M. Chizzotti,et al.  Nutrient Requirements of Zebu and Crossbred Cattle - BR-CORTE , 2016 .

[6]  J. Frisvad,et al.  Review on Mycotoxin Issues in Ruminants: Occurrence in Forages, Effects of Mycotoxin Ingestion on Health Status and Animal Performance and Practical Strategies to Counteract Their Negative Effects , 2015, Toxins.

[7]  A. Yiannikouris Holistic approach for the identification, risk assessment and mitigation of mycotoxins' impact in ruminant , 2015 .

[8]  Samina Ashiq,et al.  Natural Occurrence of Mycotoxins in Food and Feed: Pakistan Perspective. , 2015, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety.

[9]  I. Rodrigues A review on the effects of mycotoxins in dairy ruminants , 2014 .

[10]  B. Kim,et al.  Evaluation of mycotoxin sequestering agents for aflatoxin and deoxynivalenol: an in vitro approach , 2014, SpringerPlus.

[11]  J. Fink-Gremmels,et al.  Mycotoxin syndrome in dairy cattle: characterisation and intervention results , 2014 .

[12]  D. Madson,et al.  Evaluation of two mycotoxin mitigation strategies in grow-finish swine diets containing corn dried distillers grains with solubles naturally contaminated with deoxynivalenol. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[13]  M. Zain Impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals , 2011 .

[14]  J. Fink-Gremmels,et al.  Measurement of urinary zearalenone concentrations for monitoring natural feed contamination in cattle herds: On-farm trials. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[15]  J. Ha,et al.  Mycotoxins and Their Biotransformation in the Rumen: A Review , 2010 .

[16]  P. Rossi,et al.  Effect of sterified glucomannan adsorbent on growth performance and visceral caracterization of broilers chickens. , 2010 .

[17]  A. Chaiyotwittayakun Mycotoxins and health in dairy cattle. , 2010 .

[18]  João Gilberto Corrêa da Silva,et al.  EFEITO DO ADSORVENTE A BASE DE GLUCOMAMANO ESTERIFICADO NO DESEMPENHO E CARACTERIZAÇÃO VISCERAL DE FRANGOS DE CORTE , 2010 .

[19]  P. Galtier,et al.  Dietary glucomannan improves the vaccinal response in pigs exposed to aflatoxin B1 or T-2 toxin. , 2009 .

[20]  C. Balachandran,et al.  Histopathological changes in broiler chickens fed aflatoxin and cyclopiazonic acid. , 2009 .

[21]  F. Chen,et al.  The combination of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone at permitted feed concentrations causes serious physiological effects in young pigs , 2008, Journal of veterinary science.

[22]  J. Fink-Gremmels Mycotoxins in cattle feeds and carry-over to dairy milk: A review , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[23]  J. Jouany,et al.  Methods for preventing, decontaminating and minimizing the toxicity of mycotoxins in feeds , 2007 .

[24]  D. Bohnert,et al.  The ability of a yeast-derived cell wall preparation to minimize toxic effects of high-alkaloid tall fescue straw in beef cattle , 2007 .

[25]  J. François,et al.  Chemical and conformational study of the interactions involved in mycotoxin complexation with beta-D-glucans. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[26]  J. François,et al.  Comprehensive conformational study of key interactions involved in zearalenone complexation with beta-D-glucans. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[27]  J. François,et al.  Alkali extraction of beta-d-glucans from Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall and study of their adsorptive properties toward zearalenone. , 2004, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[28]  K. Anderson,et al.  Aflatoxin Binders II: Reduction of aflatoxin M1 in milk by sequestering agents of cows consuming aflatoxin in feed , 2004, Mycopathologia.

[29]  D. Mertens Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.

[30]  J. Jouany,et al.  Mycotoxins in feeds and their fate in animals: a review , 2002 .

[31]  D. Ledoux,et al.  Efficacy of a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate to ameliorate the toxic effects of aflatoxin in broiler chicks. , 1999, Poultry science.

[32]  J. Ramos,et al.  Aflatoxins and their Metabolites in the Tissues, Faeces and Urine from Lambs Feeding on an Aflatoxin-Contaminated Diet , 1997 .

[33]  J. Stabel,et al.  Effects of fumonisin-contaminated corn screenings on growth and health of feeder calves. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[34]  H. Heitman,et al.  Aflatoxin Toxicity in Beef Cattle , 1968, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[35]  J. Clegg,et al.  Gravimetric Determination of Amylase-Treated Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds with Refluxing in Beakers or Crucibles : Collaborative Study , 2022 .