Assessment with the dermal torque meter of skin pliability after treatment of burns with cultured skin substitutes.

The assessment of visco-elastic (V-E) properties in cutaneous scars is critical to reduction of impairment and restoration of function after grafting of excised burns. Cultured skin substitutes (CSS) that consist of autologous keratinocytes and fibroblasts attached to biopolymer substrates are alternatives for permanent closure of excised, full-thickness burns, but assessment of scarring has been subjective. V-E properties of CSS were measured with a Dia-Stron Dermal Torque Meter (DTM 310, Dia-Stron, Ltd, Broomall, Pa), which applies a constant torque (10 mNm) for a fixed interval (10 seconds) and measures rotational deformation and recovery. Parameters of skin deformation were measured in patients (n = 10) after grafting of CSS or meshed skin autograft. Native human skin (NHS) of healthy volunteers (n = 13) served as the control. Skin healed after treatment with CSS or autograft was evaluated for 1 year or longer after grafting. Elastic stretch (Ue), viscous stretch (Uv), total extensibility (Uf), elastic recovery (Ur), total recovery (Ua), and residual plasticity (R) were measured as degrees of rotation, were tested for significance (P < .05) by Student t test comparisons between treatment groups and controls, and were subjected to regression analysis. Assessment of burn scar with the Dermal Torque Meter detected time-dependent increases of all individual parameters of V-E properties for both CSS and autograft during the first year after grafting. At 1 year or later, no statistical differences were found between CSS and autograft for individual parameters, but Ue and Ur for autograft were significantly lower than for NHS. At 1 year or longer, autograft was significantly different from CSS or NHS, with a greater ratio of Uv to Ue, and both graft types had a lower ratio of Ur to Uf than NHS had. These results suggest that instrumental measurement of scar pliability may increase objectivity in assessment of patient recovery and establish an absolute scale for quantitative analysis of V-E properties in skin after grafting of conventional or alternative skin substitutes.

[1]  M Wallen,et al.  Comparison of the characteristics and features of pressure garments used in the management of burn scars. , 1998, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[2]  D. Greenhalgh,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Cultured Skin Substitutes and Native Skin Autograft for Treatment of Full‐Thickness Burns , 1995, Annals of surgery.

[3]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Age-related mechanical properties of human skin: an in vivo study. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  R. Richard,et al.  Use of pressure to treat hypertrophic burn scars. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[5]  Guides to evaluation of permanent impairment. The respiratory system. , 1965, JAMA.

[6]  W. Garner,et al.  Biomechanical alterations in normal skin and hypertrophic scar after thermal injury. , 1997, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[7]  J Smith,et al.  Rating the burn scar. , 1990, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[8]  D C Salter,et al.  Skin mechanics measured in vivo using torsion: a new and accurate model more sensitive to age, sex and moisturizing treatment , 1993, International journal of cosmetic science.

[9]  R. Wickett,et al.  Correlations between Dermal Torque Meter®, Cutometer®, and Dermal Phase Meter® measurements of human skin , 1997, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[10]  M. Baryza,et al.  The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. , 1995, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.