SYNTHÈSES REVIEWS ANTICIPER ET ÉVALUER L'UTILITÉ DANS LA CONCEPTION ERGONOMIQUE DES TECHNOLOGIES ÉMERGENTES : UNE REVUE

SUMMARYANTICIPATING AND EVALUATING THE USEFULNESS OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN ERGONOMIC DESIGN: A REVIEW OF USEFULNESS IN DESIGN The overall aim of this paper is to outline a review of the concept of useful-ness. In particular, it looks at the facets of usefulness and the methods and tools that could help to develop a useful system from the perspective of ergonomics. Firstly, we present the research context and explain our motivations for focusing on the usefulness of innovative systems. One reason is that there is no theoretical or methodological framework that explicitly addresses usefulness as a guide to design and dene goals, in contrast with the concept of usability. The rst section aims to clarify the concept of usefulness. We have highlighted two dimensions of usefulness: purpose-usefulness and value-usefulness. Purpose-usefulness relates to the functional and non- functional features of the artefact. Value- usefulness relates to the improvements or signicant benets that the artefact can bring to users. We then clarify the relationship between usefulness and requirements. The require-ment is the original inspiration, the argument and the justication associated with the usefulness of an artefact during the design process. The second section presents usefulness from the point of view of ergonomics. First, we show the extent to which usefulness is a built and progressive feature of systems by revealing two worlds of usefulness: the prospective world and the retrospective world. The prospective world gathers all features, requirements and thinkable (although not necessarily desirable) solutions; the retrospectiv e world puts together all the rele-vant experiences in terms of usefulness to inform designers of the artefact. We then specify the relationship between usefulness and other criteria of ergonomics, such as usability or acceptability. The third section provides an overview of methods and their contributions to the different facets of usefulness. We detail the contribu-tion of methods to the production of a hypothesis and the development of prospec-tive worlds, before moving on to prioritization, selection and the decision-making process. Finally, we examine the evaluation of usefulness. In this part, we discuss the links between the more or less conscious nature of the requirements, the two

[1]  Avi Parush,et al.  Utility and Experience in the Evolution of Usability , 2008, Maturing Usability.

[2]  Dominique L. Scapin,et al.  27. La conception de logiciels interactifs centrée sur l'utilisateur : étapes et méthodes , 2004 .

[3]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[4]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Evaluation metrics and methodologies for user-centered evaluation of intelligent systems , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[5]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A framework for understanding creativity in requirements engineering , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Simon Richir,et al.  A Decision-making Help Tool in Innovative Product Design , 2010, J. Decis. Syst..

[7]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Karen Wealands,et al.  In Pursuit of Usefulness: Resetting the Design Focus for Mobile Geographic Hypermedia Systems , 2006 .

[9]  Richard A. Spreng,et al.  A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction , 1996 .

[10]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Creativity or creativities? , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Aoussat Améziane,et al.  ANALYSIS AND TRANSLATION OF USER NEEDS FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DESIGN , 2007 .

[12]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Mesure de l'utilisabilité des Interfaces , 2005 .

[13]  J. Sheth A Model of Industrial Buyer Behavior , 1973 .

[14]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Utility and Usability: Research Issues and Development Contexts , 1992, Interact. Comput..

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[16]  Pascal Béguin,et al.  Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[17]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Prototyping Praxis: Constructing Computer Systems and Building Belief , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Dominique L. Scapin,et al.  Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Jean-Marie Burkhardt,et al.  26. Ergonomie et conception informatique , 2004 .

[20]  Jean-Marie Burkhardt,et al.  L'ergonomie de la réalité augmentée pour l'apprentissage : une revue , 2007 .

[21]  Yvon Haradji,et al.  Évolution de notre pratique de conception (1985-2005). Modéliser pour mieux coopérer à partir des critères d’utilité, d’utilisabilité… , 2006 .

[22]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  Inspection-based evaluations , 2002 .

[23]  Kirsi Silius,et al.  THE USEFULNESS OF WEB-BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS The Evaluation Tool into the Portal of Finnish Virtual University , 2003 .

[24]  André Tricot,et al.  Utilité, utilisabilité, acceptabilité : interpréter les relations entre trois dimensions de l'évaluation des EIAH , 2003 .

[25]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[26]  Françoise Darses,et al.  How do designers represent to themselves the users' needs? , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[27]  R. Rothwell Towards the Fifth‐generation Innovation Process , 1994 .

[28]  P. Béguin,et al.  Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design , 2005 .

[29]  Suzanne Robertson,et al.  Requirements trawling: techniques for discovering requirements , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Effective Communication in Requirements Elicitation: A Comparison of Methodologies , 2002, Requirements Engineering.

[31]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  P. Falzon,et al.  Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  R. Virzi Usability Inspection Methods , 1997 .

[35]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Concept-based Analysis of Surface and Structural Misfits (CASSM) Tutorial notes , 2004 .

[36]  C. Gaudart Quand l’écran masque l’expérience des opérateurs vieillissants : changement de logiciel et activité de travail dans un organisme de services , 2000 .

[37]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Explaining information technology usage: A test of competing models☆ , 2008 .

[38]  Jean-Marie Burkhardt Jean-Marie Burkhardt Réutilisation de solutions en conception orientée-objet : un modèle cognitif des mécanismes et représentations mentales Thèse de l'université Paris V, 11 juin 1997 , 1997 .

[39]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[40]  Haruhiko Kaiya,et al.  Improving the detection of requirements discordances among stakeholders , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[41]  Jean-Marie Burkhardt,et al.  Analyse exploratoire de “ points de vue ” : une contribution pour outiller les processus de conception , 2005 .

[42]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of information systems , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[43]  Stanislas Couix,et al.  Usages et construction des modèles de tâches dans la pratique de l'ergonomie : une étude exploratoire , 2007 .

[44]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[45]  Nathalie Bonnardel,et al.  Towards supporting evocation processes in creative design: A cognitive approach , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Françoise Détienne,et al.  User and developer mediation in an Open Source Software community: Boundary spanning through cross participation in online discussions , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Eric Brangier,et al.  Analyse critique des approches de l’acceptation des technologies : de l’utilisabilité à la symbiose humain-technologie-organisation , 2010 .

[48]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  Supporting creative and reflective processes , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Evaluating system utility and conceptual fit using CASSM , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[50]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.