Jumping over baselines with new methods to predict activation maps from resting-state fMRI

Cognitive fMRI research primarily relies on task-averaged responses over many subjects to describe general principles of brain function. Nonetheless, there exists a large variability between subjects that is also reflected in spontaneous brain activity as measured by resting state fMRI (rsfMRI). Leveraging this fact, several recent studies have therefore aimed at predicting task activation from rsfMRI using various machine learning methods within a growing literature on ‘connectome fingerprinting.’ In reviewing these results, we found lack of an evaluation against robust baselines that reliably supports a novelty of predictions for this task. On closer examination to reported methods, we found most underperform against trivial baseline model performances based on massive group averaging when whole-cortex prediction is considered. Here we present a modification to published methods that remedies this problem to large extent. Our proposed modification is based on a single-vertex approach that replaces commonly used brain parcellations. We further provide a summary of this model evaluation by characterizing empirical properties of where prediction for this task appears possible, explaining why some predictions largely fail for certain targets. Finally, with these empirical observations we investigate whether individual prediction scores explain individual behavioral differences in a task.

[1]  Danilo Bzdok,et al.  Formal Models of the Network Co-occurrence Underlying Mental Operations , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[2]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  J. Lindenstrauss,et al.  Extensions of lipschitz maps into Banach spaces , 1986 .

[4]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  Lisa Byrge,et al.  High-accuracy individual identification using a “thin slice” of the functional connectome , 2019, Network Neuroscience.

[6]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Task-free MRI predicts individual differences in brain activity during task performance , 2016, Science.

[8]  Xin Wen,et al.  Modeling motor task activation from resting-state fMRI using machine learning in individual subjects , 2020, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[9]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  A group model for stable multi-subject ICA on fMRI datasets , 2010, NeuroImage.

[10]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  I. Jolliffe A Note on the Use of Principal Components in Regression , 1982 .

[12]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Nathan Halko,et al.  Finding Structure with Randomness: Probabilistic Algorithms for Constructing Approximate Matrix Decompositions , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[14]  Jack L. Gallant,et al.  Pycortex: an interactive surface visualizer for fMRI , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[15]  Samantha Michalka,et al.  Sensory-biased attention networks in human lateral frontal cortex revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[16]  B T Thomas Yeo,et al.  Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[18]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[19]  Enrico Glerean,et al.  Idiosynchrony: From shared responses to individual differences during naturalistic neuroimaging , 2020, NeuroImage.

[20]  Zeynep M. Saygin,et al.  Anatomical connectivity patterns predict face-selectivity in the fusiform gyrus , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Michael Eickenberg,et al.  Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[22]  Aaditya Ramdas,et al.  REGULARIZED BRAIN READING WITH SHRINKAGE AND SMOOTHING. , 2014, The annals of applied statistics.

[23]  S. Jbabdi,et al.  Resting connectivity predicts task activation in pre-surgical populations , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[24]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  Task-Related Edge Density (TED)—A New Method for Revealing Dynamic Network Formation in fMRI Data of the Human Brain , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  C. Beckmann,et al.  Using Dual Regression to Investigate Network Shape and Amplitude in Functional Connectivity Analyses , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[26]  Gael Varoquaux,et al.  Establishment of Best Practices for Evidence for Prediction: A Review. , 2019, JAMA psychiatry.

[27]  Lisa D. Nickerson,et al.  Replication of Resting State-Task Network Correspondence and Novel Findings on Brain Network Activation During Task fMRI in the Human Connectome Project Study , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  B. T. Thomas Yeo,et al.  Inference in the age of big data: Future perspectives on neuroscience , 2017, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[30]  Peter J. Ramadge,et al.  Inter-subject alignment of human cortical anatomy using functional connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  R. Turner,et al.  Deficient approaches to human neuroimaging , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[32]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Benchmarking functional connectome-based predictive models for resting-state fMRI , 2019, NeuroImage.

[33]  James A. Brissenden,et al.  Predicting an individual's Dorsal Attention Network activity from functional connectivity fingerprints. , 2019, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Oluwasanmi Koyejo,et al.  Effects of thresholding on correlation-based image similarity metrics , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[35]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  What is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-fMRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis , 2019, Biological Psychiatry.

[36]  Peter J. Ramadge,et al.  fMRI-Based Inter-Subject Cortical Alignment Using Functional Connectivity , 2009, NIPS.

[37]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Dependence of resting-state fMRI fluctuation amplitudes on cerebral cortical orientation relative to the direction of B0 and anatomical axes , 2019, NeuroImage.

[38]  Lawrence D. Jackel,et al.  Learning Curves: Asymptotic Values and Rate of Convergence , 1993, NIPS.

[39]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Inference for the Generalization Error , 1999, Machine Learning.

[41]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[42]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[43]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Predicting Activation Across Individuals with Resting-State Functional Connectivity Based Multi-Atlas Label Fusion , 2015, MICCAI.

[44]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Paus,et al.  Functional coactivation map of the human brain. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[47]  Feilong Ma,et al.  A computational model of shared fine-scale structure in the human connectome , 2017, bioRxiv.

[48]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-Mode Activity during a Passive Sensory Task: Uncoupled from Deactivation but Impacting Activation , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions , 2017, bioRxiv.

[50]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  fMRI protocol optimization for simultaneously studying small subcortical and cortical areas at 7 ​T , 2020, NeuroImage.

[52]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Informatics and Data Mining Tools and Strategies for the Human Connectome Project , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[53]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[54]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter , 1979, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[55]  Samantha Michalka,et al.  Prediction of individualized task activation in sensory modality-selective frontal cortex with ‘connectome fingerprinting’ , 2018, NeuroImage.

[56]  Yang Wang,et al.  Regression‐based machine‐learning approaches to predict task activation using resting‐state fMRI , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[57]  Luigi Gresele,et al.  Modeling Shared Responses in Neuroimaging Studies through MultiView ICA , 2020, NeurIPS.