Children's Perspective on How Emojis Help Them to Recognise Relevant Results: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?

We discuss the exploratory study we conducted to better understand children's ability to recognise relevant results when searching in the classroom. Teachers in two European schools sharing the same language assigned their students (ages 10 and 11) an online information discovery exercise about a history topic covered in class. For this, children used a classic search interface and two novel ones enriched with emojis associated to relevant vs. irrelevant results. At the end of the exercise, children filled out a post-task questionnaire meant to elicit their perception on usability of the interfaces. Guided by four lenses, we analyse our findings and discuss whether (i) emoji-enriched interfaces lead to better performance for children using a search engine in the classroom and (ii) "actions speak louder than words'' when looking at children's search experience. We learned various lessons from our examination of children's search behaviour that will guide the design of future interfaces, including the fact that emoji-enriched interfaces result in significant improvement in terms of children identifying relevant resources.

[1]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[2]  Pia Borlund,et al.  Reconsideration of the simulated work task situation: a context instrument for evaluation of information retrieval interaction , 2010, IIiX.

[3]  Monica Landoni,et al.  Say it with Emojis: Co-designing Relevance Cues for Searching in the Classroom , 2020, CIRCLE.

[4]  Jun Zhao,et al.  `I make up a silly name': Understanding Children's Perception of Privacy Risks Online , 2019, CHI.

[5]  Ioannis Karatassis WebSAIL: Computer-based Methods for Enhancing Web Search Literacy , 2017, CHIIR.

[6]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  Looking for the Movie Seven or Sven from the Movie Frozen?: A Multi-perspective Strategy for Recommending Queries for Children , 2018, CHIIR.

[7]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Speak to Me: Interacting with a Spoken Language Interface , 2020, HCI.

[8]  Tatiana Gossen,et al.  Search Engines for Children , 2015, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

[9]  Monica Landoni,et al.  Sonny, Cerca! Evaluating the Impact of Using a Vocal Assistant to Search at School , 2019, CLEF.

[10]  Elizabeth Foss,et al.  How children search the internet with keyword interfaces , 2009, IDC.

[11]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  "Satisfaction with Failure" or "Unsatisfied Success": Investigating the Relationship between Search Success and User Satisfaction , 2018, WWW.

[12]  Ye Yuan,et al.  Children asking questions: speech interface reformulations and personification preferences , 2018, IDC.

[13]  Maram Barifah,et al.  Emotions associated with failed searches in a digital library , 2020 .

[14]  Judith H. Danovitch Growing up with Google: How children's understanding and use of internet‐based devices relates to cognitive development , 2019, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

[15]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Why doesn't the conversational agent understand me?: a language analysis of children speech , 2020, UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct.

[16]  Tatiana Gossen,et al.  Search Engines for Children - Search User Interfaces and Information-Seeking Behaviour , 2016 .

[17]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  Somewhere over the Rainbow: Exploring the Sense for Relevance in Children , 2021, ECCE.

[18]  Theo Huibers,et al.  Children searching information on the Internet: Performance on children's interfaces compared to Google , 2010 .