Hospital‐Readmission Risk — Isolating Hospital Effects from Patient Effects

BACKGROUND To isolate hospital effects on risk‐standardized hospital‐readmission rates, we examined readmission outcomes among patients who had multiple admissions for a similar diagnosis at more than one hospital within a given year. METHODS We divided the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital‐wide readmission measure cohort from July 2014 through June 2015 into two random samples. All the patients in the cohort were Medicare recipients who were at least 65 years of age. We used the first sample to calculate the risk‐standardized readmission rate within 30 days for each hospital, and we classified hospitals into performance quartiles, with a lower readmission rate indicating better performance (performance‐classification sample). The study sample (identified from the second sample) included patients who had two admissions for similar diagnoses at different hospitals that occurred more than 1 month and less than 1 year apart, and we compared the observed readmission rates among patients who had been admitted to hospitals in different performance quartiles. RESULTS In the performance‐classification sample, the median risk‐standardized readmission rate was 15.5% (interquartile range, 15.3 to 15.8). The study sample included 37,508 patients who had two admissions for similar diagnoses at a total of 4272 different hospitals. The observed readmission rate was consistently higher among patients admitted to hospitals in a worse‐performing quartile than among those admitted to hospitals in a better‐performing quartile, but the only significant difference was observed when the patients were admitted to hospitals in which one was in the best‐performing quartile and the other was in the worst‐performing quartile (absolute difference in readmission rate, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 0.4 to 3.5; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS When the same patients were admitted with similar diagnoses to hospitals in the best‐performing quartile as compared with the worst‐performing quartile of hospital readmission performance, there was a significant difference in rates of readmission within 30 days. The findings suggest that hospital quality contributes in part to readmission rates independent of factors involving patients. (Funded by Yale–New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation and others.)

[1]  P. Conway,et al.  Should Medicare Value-Based Purchasing Take Social Risk into Account? , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Corwin M Zigler,et al.  Readmission Rates After Passage of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  Leora I. Horwitz,et al.  Association Between Hospital Penalty Status Under the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and Readmission Rates for Target and Nontarget Conditions. , 2016, JAMA.

[4]  S. Normand,et al.  Accounting For Patients' Socioeconomic Status Does Not Change Hospital Readmission Rates. , 2016, Health affairs.

[5]  T. Osler,et al.  Impact of Risk Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Risk-adjusted Surgical Readmission Rates , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[6]  E John Orav,et al.  Readmissions, Observation, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Do Non-Clinical Factors Improve Prediction of Readmission Risk?: Results From the Tele-HF Study. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[8]  M. Konstam,et al.  Sisyphus and 30-Day Heart Failure Readmissions: Futility in Predicting a Flawed Outcome Metric. , 2016, JACC. Heart failure.

[9]  能登 洋 The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) サイトの活用 (特集 図書館の活用の広がり) , 2015 .

[10]  Leora I. Horwitz,et al.  Development and Validation of an Algorithm to Identify Planned Readmissions From Claims Data. , 2015, Journal of hospital medicine.

[11]  Leora I. Horwitz,et al.  Development and Use of an Administrative Claims Measure for Profiling Hospital-wide Performance on 30-Day Unplanned Readmission , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  W. Dunagan,et al.  The Risks of Not Adjusting Performance Measures for Sociodemographic Factors , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Impact of Socioeconomic Status Measures on Hospital Profiling in New York City , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[14]  Eric Rollins,et al.  Medicare readmission rates showed meaningful decline in 2012. , 2013, Medicare & medicaid research review.

[15]  A. Jha,et al.  A path forward on Medicare readmissions. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  S. Normand,et al.  Based on key measures, care quality for Medicare enrollees at safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals was almost equal. , 2012, Health affairs.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Development, validation, and results of a measure of 30-day readmission following hospitalization for pneumonia. , 2011, Journal of hospital medicine.

[18]  Harlan M. Krumholz,et al.  An Administrative Claims Measure Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day All-Cause Readmission Rates Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[19]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  National Patterns of Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure: Update on Publicly Reported Outcomes Measures Based on the 2010 Release , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[20]  Sharon-Lise T. Normand,et al.  An Administrative Claims Measure Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance on the Basis of 30-Day All-Cause Readmission Rates Among Patients With Heart Failure , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[21]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Financial barriers to health care and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, JAMA.

[22]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Race, quality of care, and outcomes of elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure. , 2003, JAMA.