Facts and fads in academic research management: The effect of management practices on research productivity in Australia

As a response to competitive market forces and governmental steering policies, Australian universities have strengthened considerably their internal research management in the last two decades. This paper examines empirically the effect of management on academic research productivity. The results suggest that management practices indeed seem to have some positive effect on research productivity, and the effect is consistent in the earlier (1995–2000) and later (2001–2007) time period. Universities with a more intensive management approach not only have higher absolute level of research productivity but they demonstrate also faster growth in productivity. An omitted variable bias and robustness of the results to the choice of the output measure are under a particular attention and call for some caution in interpreting the results.

[1]  R. Birnbaum,et al.  The Life Cycle of Academic Management Fads , 2000 .

[2]  J. S. Dawkins,et al.  Higher education: a policy statement , 1988 .

[3]  Maarja Beerkens.  Competition and concentration in the academic research industry: An empirical analysis of the sector dynamics in Australia 1990–2008 , 2013 .

[4]  Amanda H. Goodall.  Highly Cited Leaders and the Performance of Research Universities. , 2008 .

[5]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[6]  Helen Connell,et al.  University Research Management: Meeting the Institutional Challenge , 2004 .

[7]  K. R. McKinnon,et al.  Benchmarking: a manual for Australian universities , 2000 .

[8]  P. Ramsden.  Predicting institutional research performance from published indicators: A test of a classification of Australian university types , 1999 .

[9]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Why Do Management Practices Differ across Firms and Countries , 2010 .

[10]  Halil Dundar,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 1998 .

[11]  Torben Schubert,et al.  Empirical observations on New Public Management to increase efficiency in public research--Boon or bane? , 2009 .

[12]  Geraint Johnes,et al.  Determinants of research output in economics departments in British universities , 1988 .

[13]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[14]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  High performance work systems and firm performance , 1995 .

[15]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  IMPROVING LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DO MATTER , 1996 .

[16]  Simon Marginson,et al.  Competition and contestability in Australian higher education, 1987/ 1997 , 1997 .

[17]  Daniel Edwards,et al.  The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession : a comparative analysis , 2009 .

[18]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Does research organization influence academic production?: Laboratory level evidence from a large European university , 2004 .

[19]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness , 2002 .

[20]  Thomas Plümper,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects , 2007, Political Analysis.

[21]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Managing with Style: The Effect of Managers on Firm Policies , 2003 .

[22]  Manjulika Koshal,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in higher education: a case of comprehensive universities , 1999 .

[23]  Hristos Doucouliagos,et al.  Research output of Australian universities , 2004 .

[24]  Abbas Valadkhani,et al.  Ranking and Clustering Australian University Research Performance, 1998–2002 , 2006 .

[25]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Age effects in scientific productivity , 2003, Scientometrics.

[26]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Economics of Knowledge Production , 1999 .

[27]  N. Bloom.  Management Practices in Hospitals , 2008 .

[28]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Bandwagons Bring: Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation, and CEO Pay , 2000 .

[29]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  Methodological Issues in Cross‐Sectional and Panel Estimates of the Human Resource‐Firm Performance Link , 1996 .

[30]  David Kemp,et al.  Knowledge and innovation: a policy statement on research and research training , 1999 .

[31]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity , 2005, Scientometrics.

[32]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[33]  John Taylor.  Managing the Unmanageable: The Management of Research in Research-Intensive Universities , 2006 .

[34]  Lars Engwall,et al.  Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation , 2010 .

[35]  John Hattie,et al.  The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness , 2002 .

[36]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators , 2012, Scientometrics.

[37]  The Growing Allocative Inefficiency of the U.S. Higher Education Sector , 2006 .

[38]  J. V. Reenen.  Does Competition Raise Productivity Through Improving Management Quality , 2011 .

[39]  C. Wilderom,et al.  Twenty Practices of an Entrepreneurial University , 2006 .

[40]  F. Wood,et al.  Over-reviewed and Underfunded? The evolving policy context of Australian higher education research and development , 2002 .

[41]  S. Marginson,et al.  The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia , 2000 .