UWB Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Measurements and Modeling Using UAVs

This paper presents an experimental study of the air-to-ground (AG) propagation channel through ultrawideband (UWB) measurements in an open area using unmanned-aerial-vehicles (UAVs). Measurements were performed using UWB radios operating in the frequency range of 3.1 GHz-4.8 GHz and UWB planar elliptical dipole antennas having an omni-directional pattern in the azimuth plane and typical donut shaped pattern in the elevation plane. Three scenarios were considered for the channel measurements: (i) two receivers (RXs) at different heights above the ground and placed close to each other in line-of-sight (LOS) with the transmitter (TX) on the UAV and the UAV is hovering; (ii) RXs in obstructed line-of-sight (OLOS) with the UAV TX due to foliage, and the UAV is hovering; and, (iii) UAV moving in a circular path. Different horizontal and vertical distances between the RXs and the TX were used in the measurements. In addition, two different antenna orientations were used on the UAV antennas (vertical and horizontal) to analyze the effects of antenna radiation patterns on the UWB AG propagation. From the empirical results, it was observed that the received power depends mainly on the antenna radiation pattern in the elevation plane when the antennas are oriented in the same direction, as expected for these omni-azimuth antennas. Moreover, the overall antenna gain at the TX and RX can be approximated using trigonometric functions of the elevation angle. The antenna orientation (polarization) mismatch increases path loss, and produces a larger number of weak multipath components (MPCs) than when aligned. Similarly, additional path loss and a larger number of MPCs were observed for the OLOS scenario. In the case of the UAV moving in a circular path, the antenna orientation mismatch has smaller effects on the path loss than when the UAV is hovering, because a larger number of cross polarized components are received during motion. A statistical channel model for UWB AG propagation is built from the empirical results.

[1]  H. T. Kung,et al.  Performance Measurement of 802.11a Wireless Links from UAV to Ground Nodes with Various Antenna Orientations , 2006, Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[2]  A.A.M. Saleh,et al.  A Statistical Model for Indoor Multipath Propagation , 1987, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[3]  Ismail Guvenc,et al.  Improved Throughput Coverage in Natural Disasters: Unmanned Aerial Base Stations for Public-Safety Communications , 2016, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[4]  Pavel Pechac,et al.  The UAV Low Elevation Propagation Channel in Urban Areas: Statistical Analysis and Time-Series Generator , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[5]  Jianwu Dou,et al.  Channel Modeling for Low-Altitude UAV in Suburban Environments Based on Ray Tracer , 2018 .

[6]  Ismail Güvenç,et al.  UWB Channel Sounding and Modeling for UAV Air-to-Ground Propagation Channels , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[7]  Ozgur Ozdemir,et al.  Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of mm Wave Propagation Channels for UAVs , 2018, 2018 11th Global Symposium on Millimeter Waves (GSMM).

[8]  Ismail Güvenç,et al.  UAV Air-to-Ground Channel Characterization for mmWave Systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE 86th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[9]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Part I: Methods, Measurements, and Models for Over-Water Settings , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[10]  Hiroyuki Tsuji,et al.  S-band radio propagation characteristics in urban environment for unmanned aircraft systems , 2015, 2015 International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP).

[11]  David W. Matolak,et al.  A Survey of Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Modeling for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Part II: Hilly and Mountainous Settings , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Ismail Güvenç,et al.  Impact of 3D UWB Antenna Radiation Pattern on Air-to-Ground Drone Connectivity , 2018, 2018 IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall).

[14]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wideband Millimeter-Wave Propagation Measurements and Channel Models for Future Wireless Communication System Design , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Part III: The Suburban and Near-Urban Environments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Christian Bettstetter,et al.  Channel measurements over 802.11a-based UAV-to-ground links , 2011, 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps).