Improving recombinant protein production using TISIGNER.com
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Gardner,et al. Solubility-Weighted Index: fast and accurate prediction of protein solubility , 2020, bioRxiv.
[2] Marianne Rooman,et al. Computational analysis of the amino acid interactions that promote or decrease protein solubility , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[3] J. Plotkin,et al. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[4] Adam Paul Arkin,et al. Evaluation of 244,000 synthetic sequences reveals design principles to optimize translation in Escherichia coli , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.
[5] Peter F. Stadler,et al. Local RNA base pairing probabilities in large sequences , 2006, Bioinform..
[6] Germán L. Rosano,et al. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges , 2014, Front. Microbiol..
[7] G. Waldo,et al. Genetic screens and directed evolution for protein solubility. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[8] Reinhard Wolf,et al. Coding-Sequence Determinants of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2009 .
[9] Tamir Tuller,et al. Modelling the Efficiency of Codon–tRNA Interactions Based on Codon Usage Bias , 2014, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.
[10] Stephan H. Bernhart,et al. RNA Accessibility in cubic time , 2011, Algorithms for Molecular Biology.
[11] P. Gardner,et al. Highly accessible translation initiation sites are predictive of successful heterologous protein expression , 2019, bioRxiv.
[12] M. Moore,et al. mRNA structure regulates protein expression through changes in functional half-life , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[13] Robert D. Finn,et al. HMMER web server: 2018 update , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..
[14] Arkady B. Khodursky,et al. Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[15] Robert D. Finn,et al. Rfam 13.0: shifting to a genome-centric resource for non-coding RNA families , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..
[16] Eran Segal,et al. Deciphering the rules by which 5′-UTR sequences affect protein expression in yeast , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] P. Gardner,et al. Avoidance of stochastic RNA interactions can be harnessed to control protein expression levels in bacteria and archaea , 2015, bioRxiv.
[18] B. Strukelj,et al. Current state and recent advances in biopharmaceutical production in Escherichia coli, yeasts and mammalian cells , 2013, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.
[19] P. Gardner,et al. Annotating RNA motifs in sequences and alignments , 2014, bioRxiv.
[20] C. Pace,et al. Toward a molecular understanding of protein solubility: increased negative surface charge correlates with increased solubility. , 2012, Biophysical journal.
[21] L. Domingues,et al. Fusion tags for protein solubility, purification and immunogenicity in Escherichia coli: the novel Fh8 system , 2014, Front. Microbiol..
[22] Peter F. Stadler,et al. ViennaRNA Package 2.0 , 2011, Algorithms for Molecular Biology.
[23] Dominic Esposito,et al. Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. , 2006, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[24] G. W. Hatfield,et al. Nonrandom utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] Amit Sharma,et al. DNASU plasmid and PSI:Biology-Materials repositories: resources to accelerate biological research , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..
[26] John D. Westbrook,et al. TargetDB: a target registration database for structural genomics projects , 2004, Bioinform..
[27] T. Tuller,et al. Multiple roles of the coding sequence 5′ end in gene expression regulation , 2014, Nucleic acids research.
[28] Chris M. Brown,et al. The exon–intron gene structure upstream of the initiation codon predicts translation efficiency , 2018, Nucleic acids research.
[29] P. Sharp,et al. The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.
[30] J. van Duin,et al. Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] Chun-Nan Hsu,et al. Learning to predict expression efficacy of vectors in recombinant protein production , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[32] Sean R. Eddy,et al. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches , 2013, Bioinform..
[33] L. Wernisch,et al. Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.
[34] E. Marcotte,et al. Global signatures of protein and mRNA expression levelsw , 2009 .
[35] Paul J. Choi,et al. Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.
[36] E. Grayhack,et al. Synonymous Codons: Choose Wisely for Expression. , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.