A task-difficulty artifact in subliminal priming

Subliminal priming is said to occur when a subliminal prime influences the classification of a subsequent target. Most subliminal-priming claims are based on separate target- and prime-classification tasks. Because primes are intended to be subliminal, the prime-classification task is difficult, and the target-classification task is easy. To assess whether this task-difficulty difference accounts for previous claims of subliminal priming, we manipulated the ease of the prime-classification task by intermixing long-duration (visible) primes with short-duration (near liminal) ones. In Experiment 1, this strategy of intermixing long-duration primes raised classification of the shortduration ones. In Experiments 2 and 3, prime duration was lowered in such a way that prime classification was at chance in intermixed presentations. Under these conditions, we failed to observe any priming effects; hence, previous demonstrations of subliminal priming may simply have reflected a task-difficulty artifact.

[1]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  P. Merikle,et al.  Priming with and without awareness , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition , 2003, Cognition.

[4]  Derek Besner,et al.  New Limits to Automaticity: Context Modulates Semantic Priming , 1994 .

[5]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Detecting chance: A solution to the null sensitivity problem in subliminal priming , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measurement error in subliminal perception experiments: Simulation analyses of two regression methods , 2000 .

[7]  M. Leboyer,et al.  Conscious and subliminal conflicts in normal subjects and patients with schizophrenia: The role of the anterior cingulate , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  E. Reingold.  Unconscious perception and the classic dissociation paradigm: A new angle? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  E. Bernat,et al.  Unconscious perception: A model-based approach to method and evidence , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Richard L. Abrams,et al.  Three Cognitive Markers of Unconscious Semantic Activation , 1996, Science.

[12]  K. Paller,et al.  Neural and behavioral evidence for affective priming from unconsciously perceived emotional facial expressions and the influence of trait anxiety , 2008 .

[13]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[14]  T. Verguts,et al.  How to trigger elaborate processing? A comment on Kunde, Kiesel, and Hoffmann (2003) , 2005, Cognition.

[15]  P. Bertelson.  S-R relationships and reaction times to new versus repeated signals in a serial task , 1963 .

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli , 2001, Cognition.

[17]  K C Klauer,et al.  An unbiased errors-in-variables approach to detecting unconscious cognition. , 1998, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[18]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  S C Draine,et al.  Replicable unconscious semantic priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  E. Reingold.  Interpreting Dissociations: The Issue of Task Comparability , 2003, Cortex.

[23]  E. Reingold,et al.  Theory and measurement in the study of unconscious processes , 1990 .

[24]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming , 1998, Nature.

[25]  D. Kahneman,et al.  THE TIME-INTENSITY RELATION IN VISUAL PERCEPTION AS A FUNCTION OF OBSERVER'S TASK. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  E. Reingold,et al.  Using direct and indirect measures to study perception without awareness , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Long-term semantic memory versus contextual memory in unconscious number processing. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Activation by marginally perceptible stimuli: Dissociation of unconscious from conscious cognition , 1995 .

[29]  B. Dosher.  The response-window regression method—Some problematic assumptions: Comment on Draine and Greenwald (1998). , 1998 .