The influence of facet joint orientation and tropism on the stress at the adjacent segment after lumbar fusion surgery: a biomechanical analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Facet joint orientation and tropism influence the biomechanics of the corresponding segment. Therefore, the sagittal orientation or tropism of the facet joint adjacent to the fusion segment seems a potential risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration. However, there have been no biomechanical studies regarding this issue. PURPOSE To investigate the association between adjacent facet orientation and facet tropism and stress in adjacent disc/facet joints using finite element (FE) analysis. STUDY DESIGN An FE analysis. METHODS Four intact (F50, F55, F60, and FT [facet tropism]) and matched L3-L4 fusion (F50, F55, F60, and FT fusion) models with different facet joint orientation (50°, 55°, 60° relative to the coronal plane, and facet tropism, respectively) at both L2-L3 facet joints were simulated. In each model, intradiscal pressures and facet contact force at the L2-L3 segment were investigated under pure moments and anterior shear force. RESULTS Compared with the matched-intact model, the F60 fusion model yielded the highest and largest percentage increase of intradiscal pressure at the L2-L3 segment under flexion, torsion moment, and anterior shear force among the F50, F55, and F60 fusion models. F60 fusion model also demonstrated the largest facet contact force under torsion moment among the F50, F55, and F60 fusion models. In all conditions tested, the FT fusion model demonstrated the highest intradiscal pressure and facet contact force of all the models. CONCLUSIONS Facet joint orientation and tropism at the adjacent segment influences the overstress of the adjacent segment, especially under the clinical circumstance of increased anterior shear force.

[1]  W. Hutton,et al.  Articular Tropism and Stability of the Lumbar Spine , 1980, Spine.

[2]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Orientation of the Lumbar Facet Joints: Association with Degenerative Disc Disease* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A. M. Ahmed,et al.  Stress analysis of the lumbar disc-body unit in compression. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element study. , 1984, Spine.

[4]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on spine kinematics and facet joint loads in flexion and extension: a finite element analysis , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[5]  A. Rohlmann,et al.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[6]  Ali Guermazi,et al.  Facet Orientation and Tropism: Associations With Facet Joint Osteoarthritis and Degeneratives , 2009, Spine.

[7]  A. Watanabe,et al.  Facet Joint Orientation Difference Between Cephalad and Caudad Portions: A Possible Cause of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis , 2009, Spine.

[8]  A Elhagediab,et al.  Biomechanical properties of human lumbar spine ligaments. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  I. Karacan,et al.  Facet Angles in Lumbar Disc Herniation: Their Relation to Anthropometric Features , 2004, Spine.

[10]  Y. E. Kim,et al.  An Analytical Investigation of the Mechanics of Spinal Instrumentation , 1988, Spine.

[11]  H. Wu,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the human annulus fibrosus. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  K. Cho,et al.  Selection of proximal fusion level for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[13]  Choon-Sung Lee,et al.  Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[14]  Gang Li,et al.  Range of Motion and Orientation of the Lumbar Facet Joints In Vivo , 2009, Spine.

[15]  S. Mardjetko,et al.  Debate: determining the upper instrumented vertebra in the management of adult degenerative scoliosis: stopping at T10 versus L1. , 2006, Spine.

[16]  L. Dai,et al.  Role of facet asymmetry in lumbar spine disorders. , 1996, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[17]  Young Kim,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Threaded Cylindrical Cage and Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2007, Spine.

[18]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Mechanical Response of a Lumbar Motion Segment in Axial Torque Alone and Combined with Compression , 1986, Spine.

[19]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Mitsuru Furukawa,et al.  Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Efficacy of Simultaneous Decompression Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[21]  K. Ha,et al.  Bone Graft Volumetric Changes and Clinical Outcomes After Instrumented Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: A Prospective Cohort Study With a Five-Year Follow-up , 2009, Spine.

[22]  V K Goel,et al.  Effect of Disc Degeneration at One Level on the Adjacent Level in Axial Mode , 1991, Spine.

[23]  N. Langrana,et al.  Role of Ligaments and Facets in Lumbar Spinal Stability , 1995, Spine.

[24]  Alexander R. Vaccaro,et al.  Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Disease After Arthrodesis and Total Disc Arthroplasty , 2008, Spine.

[25]  H. Farfan,et al.  Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration: the influence of geometrical features on the pattern of disc degeneration--a post mortem study. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  L. Lenke,et al.  Sagittal Thoracic Decompensation Following Long Adult Lumbar Spinal Instrumentation and Fusion to L5 or S1: Causes, Prevalence, and Risk Factor Analysis , 2006, Spine.

[27]  Jean-Paul Steib,et al.  Sagittal spinopelvic alignment and body mass index in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[28]  Gunnar B J Andersson,et al.  Recent Advances in Analytical Modeling of Lumbar Disc Degeneration , 2004, Spine.

[29]  CASEY K. LEE,et al.  Accelerated Degeneration of the Segment Adjacent to a Lumbar Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[30]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Disc Injury on Mechanical Behavior of the Human Spine , 1984, Spine.

[31]  Paul Park,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease after Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion: Review of the Literature , 2004, Spine.

[32]  S. Suk,et al.  Incidence of Proximal Adjacent Failure in Adult Lumbar Deformity Correction Based on Proximal Fusion Level , 2007, Asian spine journal.

[33]  M. Aebi,et al.  Junctional spinal disorders in operated adult spinal deformities: present understanding and future perspectives , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[34]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Charité Artificial Disc on the Implanted and Adjacent Spinal Segments Mechanics Using a Hybrid Testing Protocol , 2005, Spine.

[35]  W. Lo,et al.  Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  Avinash G Patwardhan,et al.  Novel model to analyze the effect of a large compressive follower pre-load on range of motions in a lumbar spine. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Hendrik Schmidt,et al.  Prospective Design Delineation and Subsequent In Vitro Evaluation of a New Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System , 2009, Spine.

[38]  Ho-Joong Kim,et al.  The biomechanical influence of the facet joint orientation and the facet tropism in the lumbar spine. , 2013, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[39]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis , 2003, European Spine Journal.