Beyond the margin recipe: the probability of correct target dosage and tumor control in the presence of a dose limiting structure

In the past, hypothetical spherical target volumes and ideally conformal dose distributions were analyzed to establish the safety of planning target volume (PTV) margins. In this work we extended these models to estimate how alternative methods of shaping dose distributions could lead to clinical improvements. Based on a spherical clinical target volume (CTV) and Gaussian distributions of systematic and random geometrical uncertainties, idealized 3D dose distributions were optimized to exhibit specific stochastic properties. A nearby spherical organ at risk (OAR) was introduced to explore the benefit of non-spherical dose distributions. Optimizing for the same minimum dose safety criterion as implied by the generally accepted use of a PTV, the extent of the high dose region in one direction could be reduced by half provided that dose in other directions is sufficiently compensated. Further reduction of this unilateral dosimetric margin decreased the target dose confidence, however the actual minimum CTV dose at 90% confidence typically exceeded the minimum PTV dose by 20% of prescription. Incorporation of smooth dose-effect relations within the optimization led to more concentrated dose distributions compared to the use of a PTV, with an improved balance between the probability of tumor cell kill and the risk of geometrical miss, and lower dose to surrounding tissues. Tumor control rate improvements in excess of 20% were found to be common for equal integral dose, while at the same time evading a nearby OAR. These results were robust against uncertainties in dose-effect relations and target heterogeneity, and did not depend on 'shoulders' or 'horns' in the dose distributions.

[1]  J O Deasy,et al.  Modelling the interplay between hypoxia and proliferation in radiotherapy tumour response , 2013, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[2]  Marnix G Witte,et al.  IMRT optimization including random and systematic geometric errors based on the expectation of TCP and NTCP. , 2007, Medical physics.

[3]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Melvin L. Griem,et al.  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy , 1994 .

[5]  J. Unkelbach,et al.  Inclusion of organ movements in IMRT treatment planning via inverse planning based on probability distributions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. Brahme,et al.  Optimal radiation beam profiles considering uncertainties in beam patient alignment. , 1993, Acta oncologica.

[7]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  S M Bentzen,et al.  Quantifying the position and steepness of radiation dose-response curves. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Dealing with geometric uncertainties in dose painting by numbers: introducing the ΔVH. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  David Craft,et al.  The Price of Target Dose Uniformity. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  M. Zaider,et al.  Tumour control probability: a formulation applicable to any temporal protocol of dose delivery. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  S Webb,et al.  A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effects of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A. Brahme,et al.  An adaptive control algorithm for optimization of intensity modulated radiotherapy considering uncertainties in beam profiles, patient set-up and internal organ motion. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[15]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  W. Tomé,et al.  Risk-adaptive optimization: selective boosting of high-risk tumor subvolumes. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Compensation of x-ray beam penumbra in conformal radiotherapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[18]  E Weiss,et al.  Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria. , 2010, Medical physics.

[19]  Marnix G Witte,et al.  Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  M van Herk,et al.  Field size reduction enables iso-NTCP escalation of tumor control probability for irradiation of lung tumors. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  PlanJury: probabilistic plan evaluation revisited , 2014 .

[22]  Maaike R Moman,et al.  Pathologic validation of a model based on diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for tumor delineation in the prostate peripheral zone. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. Alber,et al.  Robust treatment planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on coverage probabilities. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.