Optimal design of pure-friction isolators with and without restoring device: A multi-objective cuckoo search-based approach for seismic-excited structures

Abstract The present study addresses the optimal design problem of pure-friction isolators with a restoring device for seismic-excited structures. A multi-objective cuckoo search-based design approach is proposed to create a suitable balance between the conflicting objectives i.e. the reduction of base displacement and superstructure accelerations. Numerical studies are carried out on three structures with 4, 8 and 12 stories. Sixteen performance indices related to the root mean squares (RMS) and maximum seismic responses of the isolation system and superstructure, and the maximum energy responses of the superstructure are defined for evaluation of the proposed optimal design approach. For comparison purposes, the optimal design approach is applied for the corresponding pure-friction isolated structures without the restoring device. For seven earthquakes considered in this study, the simulation results show that the pure-friction systems significantly mitigates the seismic responses and maximum input and damage energies entering to the superstructure. Furthermore, equipping the pure-friction isolation system with the optimized restoring device may result in a moderate increment in the superstructure responses. Nevertheless, the given responses are significantly less than the responses of the corresponding fixed-base structures. At the cost of increasing some seismic responses due to the use of the restoring device, important advantages are given in terms of significant reduction of the base displacement and eliminate their residual displacement. It is also found that the seismic performance of the pure-friction isolation systems, in both cases, often decreases by increasing the number of stories.

[1]  R. S. Jangid,et al.  Seismic Response of Structures with Variable Friction Pendulum System , 2009 .

[2]  Yongbo Peng,et al.  Performance evaluation of base‐isolated structures with sliding hydromagnetic bearings , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[3]  N. Fallah,et al.  Multi-objective optimal design of sliding base isolation using genetic algorithm , 2012 .

[4]  Mahmoud Bayat,et al.  Analysis of the steel braced frames equipped with ADAS devices under the far field records , 2011 .

[5]  S. Etedali,et al.  Seismic responses and energy dissipation of pure-friction and resilient‐friction base-isolated structures: A parametric study , 2020 .

[6]  Sadegh Etedali,et al.  A proposed approach to mitigate the torsional amplifications of asymmetric base-isolated buildings during earthquakes , 2016 .

[7]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Soil-dependent optimum design of a new passive vibration control system combining seismic base isolation with tuned inerter damper , 2018 .

[8]  Sadegh Etedali,et al.  A new modified independent modal space control approach toward control of seismic-excited structures , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[9]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Innovative base-isolated building with large mass-ratio TMD at basement for greater earthquake resilience , 2015 .

[10]  Lap-Loi Chung,et al.  Optimal frictional coefficient of structural isolation system , 2015 .

[11]  Paolo Dubini,et al.  Numerical Assessment of Frictional Heating in Sliding Bearings for Seismic Isolation , 2014 .

[12]  Mahmoud Bayat,et al.  On the effect of the near field records on the steel braced frames equipped with energy dissipating devices , 2011 .

[13]  Saeed Tavakoli,et al.  Adaptive fractional order fuzzy proportional–integral–derivative control of smart base-isolated structures equipped with magnetorheological dampers , 2017 .

[14]  Khoshnoudian Faramarz,et al.  RESPONSE OF PURE-FRICTION SLIDING STRUCTURES TO THREE COMPONENTS OF EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION CONSIDERING VARIATIONS IN THE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION , 2009 .

[15]  Alberto Pavese,et al.  Experimental investigation of the cyclic response of double curved surface sliders subjected to radial and bidirectional sliding motions , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[16]  Nader Mollayi,et al.  Cuckoo Search-Based Least Squares Support Vector Machine Models for Optimum Tuning of Tuned Mass Dampers , 2017 .

[17]  Sadegh Etedali,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis on Optimal PID Controller for Nonlinear Smart Base-Isolated Structures , 2019, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics.

[18]  S. Etedali,et al.  MOCS-based optimum design of TMD and FTMD for tall buildings under near-field earthquakes including SSI effects , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Pankaj Agarwal,et al.  Suitable friction sliding materials for base isolation of masonry buildings , 2012 .

[21]  Amir Hossein Gandomi,et al.  Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems , 2011, Engineering with Computers.

[22]  Saeed Tavakoli,et al.  Fractional order PID control design for semi-active control of smart base-isolated structures: A multi-objective cuckoo search approach. , 2017, ISA transactions.

[23]  Antonina Pirrotta,et al.  Optimal design of tuned liquid column dampers for seismic response control of base-isolated structures , 2018 .

[24]  A. Fuladgar,et al.  Response of pure-friction sliding structures to three components of earthquake excitation , 2003 .

[25]  Dario De Domenico,et al.  Effective base isolation combining low-friction curved surface sliders and hysteretic gap dampers , 2020 .

[26]  Mojtaba Mahsuli,et al.  Reliability-based design of steel moment frame structures isolated by lead-rubber bearing systems , 2019, Structures.

[27]  Gebrail Bekdaş,et al.  Optimization of seismic isolation systems via harmony search , 2014 .

[28]  R. S. Jangid Seismic response of an asymmetric base isolated structure , 1996 .

[29]  Saeed Tavakoli,et al.  Online tuning of fractional order fuzzy PID controller in smart seismic isolated structures , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[30]  Saeed Tavakoli,et al.  Design of a decoupled PID controller via MOCS for seismic control of smart structures , 2016 .

[31]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Design strategies of viscous dampers for seismic protection of building structures: A review , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[32]  David J. Wagg,et al.  Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings , 2019, Journal of the Franklin Institute.

[33]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis , 2007 .

[34]  Samit Ray-Chaudhuri,et al.  Design of re-centering spring for flat sliding base isolation system: Theory and a numerical study , 2016 .

[35]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of Structures with Seismic Isolation , 2001 .

[36]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Multiobjective cuckoo search for design optimization , 2013, Comput. Oper. Res..

[37]  M. De Angelis,et al.  Optimal passive control of adjacent structures interconnected with nonlinear hysteretic devices , 2007 .

[38]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  Seismic Fragility Assessment of Asymmetric Structures Supported on TCFP Bearings Subjected to Near-field Earthquakes , 2018 .

[39]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Earthquake protection of structures with nonlinear viscous dampers optimized through an energy-based stochastic approach , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[40]  Sadegh Etedali,et al.  A hybrid LQR-PID control design for seismic control of buildings equipped with ATMD , 2018 .

[41]  Agrahara Krishnamoorthy,et al.  Soil–structure interaction analysis of a FPS-isolated structure using finite element model , 2016 .

[42]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Smart base‐isolated benchmark building part IV: Phase II sample controllers for nonlinear isolation systems , 2006 .

[43]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Analytical and finite element investigation on the thermo-mechanical coupled response of friction isolators under bidirectional excitation , 2018 .

[44]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[45]  Samuele Infanti,et al.  Frictional Heating in Double Curved Surface Sliders and Its Effects on the Hysteretic Behavior: An Experimental Study , 2019, Front. Built Environ..

[46]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Optimum Design of Resilient Sliding Isolation System for Seismic Protection of Equipments , 2007 .

[47]  Paolo Castaldo,et al.  Optimal design of friction pendulum system properties for isolated structures considering different soil conditions , 2016 .

[48]  A. Krishnamoorthy RESPONSE OF SLIDING STRUCTURE WITH RESTORING FORCE DEVICE TO EARTHQUAKE SUPPORT MOTION , 2008 .

[49]  D. De Domenico,et al.  An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) , 2018 .

[50]  RabieiMontazar,et al.  Response of multistory friction pendulum base-isolated buildings including the vertical component of earthquakes , 2011 .

[51]  Xin-She Yang,et al.  Design optimization of truss structures using cuckoo search algorithm , 2013 .

[52]  Giuseppe Ricciardi,et al.  Earthquake-resilient design of base isolated buildings with TMD at basement: Application to a case study , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[53]  R. S. Jangid Response of pure-friction sliding structures to bi-directional harmonic ground motion , 1997 .

[54]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Optimum design of steel frames using Cuckoo Search algorithm with Lévy flights , 2013 .

[55]  R. S. Jangid Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems , 2000 .

[56]  Amadeo Benavent-Climent,et al.  An energy-based method for seismic retrofit of existing frames using hysteretic dampers , 2011 .