Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly.

BACKGROUND Bypass surgery in the elderly (age >70 years) has increased mortality and morbidity, which may be a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compare the outcomes of a cohort of elderly off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patients with elderly conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS Chart and provincial cardiac care registry data were reviewed for 30 consecutive elderly OPCAB patients (age 74.7 +/- 4.2 years) and 60 consecutive CABG patients (age 74.9 +/- 4.1 years, p = 0.82) with similar risk factor profiles: Parsonnet score 17.2 +/- 8.1 (OPCAB) versus 15.6 +/- 6.5 (CABG), p = 0.31; and Ontario provincial acuity index 4.5 +/- 1.9 (OPCAB) versus 4.3 +/- 2.0 (CABG), p = 0.65. RESULTS Mean hospital stay was 6.3 +/- 1.8 days for OPCAB patients and 7.7 +/- 3.9 days for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Average intensive care unit stay was 24.0 +/- 10.9 h for OPCAB patients versus 36.6 +/- 33.5 h for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 10.0% of OPCAB patients and 28.3% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Low output syndrome was observed in 10% of OPCAB patients and 31.7% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Cost was reduced by $1,082 (Canadian) per patient in the OPCAB group. Postoperative OPCAB graft analysis showed 100% patency. CONCLUSIONS OPCAB is safe in the geriatric population and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity and cost.

[1]  C D Naylor,et al.  Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Allen J. Taylor,et al.  Current status of coronary artery operation in septuagenarians. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  C. Naylor,et al.  Fifteen-year trends in risk severity and operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 1998, Circulation.

[4]  E. Buffolo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  W. Boyd,et al.  Safety and cost-effectiveness of MIDCABG in high-risk CABG patients. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  F. Benetti,et al.  Direct myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation. Experience in 700 patients. , 1991, Chest.

[7]  S. Gallina,et al.  Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[9]  J. Tu,et al.  Multicenter validation of a risk index for mortality, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery. Steering Committee of the Provincial Adult Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. , 1995, Circulation.