Effects of Exemplification in News Reports on the Perception of Social Issues

A news report on the plight of a minority of American family farmers was manipulated to create versions differing in the degree of precision of general information (precise, imprecise) and in the use of exemplifying case histories (selective, blended, representative). Selective exemplification featured only histories of failing farms, representative exemplification a distribution of histories of failing and successful farms proportional to their actual occurrence. Respondents reported their own views concerning the farmers' plight either shortly after reading or after a delay of one or two weeks. The accuracy of estimates of failing farms was found to be highest for representative and lowest for selective exemplification—despite the availability of corrective general information. These effects were stable over time.

[1]  J. B. Haskins.  The Trouble with Bad News , 1981 .

[2]  Nancy E. Avis,et al.  Base rates can affect individual predictions. , 1980 .

[3]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  When Do Base Rates Affect Predictions , 1981 .

[4]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive Communications , 1994 .

[5]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .

[6]  D. Zillmann.  Cognitive and Affective Adaptation to Advancing Communication Technology , 1994 .

[7]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Attribution and the psychology of prediction. , 1975 .

[8]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis. , 1971 .

[9]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exaggerated Versus Representative Exemplification in News Reports , 1994 .

[10]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Impression-formation effects of printed news varying in descriptive precision and exemplifications. , 1992 .

[11]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  The Impact of Quotation in News Reports on Issue Perception , 1993 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[14]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[15]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  A MULTICOMPONENT THEORY OF THE MEMORY TRACE , 1977 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[17]  Nancy E. Avis,et al.  Reply to Bar-Hillel and Fischhoff. , 1981 .

[18]  I. Ajzen.  Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. , 1977 .

[19]  S. Fulero,et al.  From individual to group impressions: Availability heuristics in stereotype formation , 1978 .

[20]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing , 1986 .

[21]  Michael A. Shapiro,et al.  Memory and Decision Processes in the Construction of Social Reality , 1991 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.