Identifying and removing micro-drift in ground-based electromagnetic induction data

Abstract As the application of ground-based frequency domain electromagnetic induction (FDEM) surveys is on the rise, so increases the need for processing strategies that allow exploiting the full potential of these often large survey datasets. While a common issue is the detection of baseline drift affecting FDEM measurements, the impact of residual corrugations present after initial drift removal is less documented. Comparable to the influence of baseline drift, this ‘micro-drift’ introduces aberrant data fluctuations through time, independent of the true subsurface variability. Here, we present a method to detect micro-drift in drift-corrected FDEM survey data, therefore allowing its removal. The core of the procedure lies in approaching survey datasets as a time series. Hereby, discrete multi-level wavelet decomposition is used to isolate micro-drift in FDEM data. Detected micro-drift is then excluded in subsequent signal reconstruction to produce a more accurate FDEM dataset. While independently executed from ancillary information, tie-line measurements are used to evaluate the reliability and pitfalls of the procedure. This demonstrates how data levelling without evaluation data can increase subjectivity of the procedure, and shows the flexibility and efficiency of the approach in detecting minute drift effects. We corroborated the method through its application on three experimental field datasets, consisting of both quadrature and in-phase measurements gathered with different FDEM instruments. Through a 1D assessment of micro-drift, we show how it impacts FDEM survey data, and how it can be identified and accounted for in straightforward processing steps.

[1]  E. Brevik,et al.  The use of electromagnetic induction techniques in soils studies , 2014 .

[2]  Philippe De Smedt,et al.  Unveiling the prehistoric landscape at Stonehenge through multi-receiver EMI , 2014 .

[3]  Marc Van Meirvenne,et al.  Evaluating the multiple coil configurations of the EM38DD and DUALEM‐21S sensors to detect archaeological anomalies , 2009 .

[4]  Philippe De Smedt,et al.  Imaging a Polygonal Network of Ice‐Wedge Casts with an Electromagnetic Induction Sensor , 2011 .

[5]  Marco Gambetta,et al.  Microlevelling procedures applied to regional aeromagnetic data: an example from the Transantarctic Mountains (Antarctica) , 1998 .

[6]  N. Kitchen,et al.  Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture , 2001 .

[7]  Philippe De Smedt,et al.  Exploring the potential of multi-receiver EMI survey for geoarchaeological prospection: A 90 ha dataset , 2013 .

[8]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Global Prospects Rooted in Soil Science , 2011 .

[9]  Jorge Luís Porsani,et al.  Comparing performance of instrumental drift correction by linear and quadratic adjusting in inductive electromagnetic data , 2011 .

[10]  Egon Zimmermann,et al.  Development and drift-analysis of a modular electromagnetic induction system for shallow ground conductivity measurements , 2014 .

[11]  B. Münch,et al.  Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet--Fourier filtering. , 2009, Optics express.

[12]  David Beamish,et al.  Levelling aeromagnetic survey data without the need for tie‐lines , 2015 .

[13]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties , 1996 .

[14]  Bruce D. Smith,et al.  Calibration and filtering strategies for frequency domain electromagnetic data , 2012 .

[15]  David C. Nobes,et al.  Troubled waters: Environmental applications of electrical and electromagnetic methods , 1996 .

[16]  Laurie Davies,et al.  The identification of multiple outliers , 1993 .

[17]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[18]  D. Corwin,et al.  Application of Soil Electrical Conductivity to Precision Agriculture , 2003 .

[19]  Ronald K. Pearson,et al.  Outliers in process modeling and identification , 2002, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[20]  David J. Isles,et al.  Airborne geophysics in Western Australia , 1994 .

[21]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Minimizing Drift in Electrical Conductivity Measurements in High Temperature Environments using the EM-38 , 2004 .

[22]  B. Minty,et al.  Simple micro-levelling for aeromagnetic data , 1991 .

[23]  L. Pellerin Applications Of Electrical And Electromagnetic Methods For Environmental And Geotechnical Investigations , 2002 .

[24]  Mark E. Everett,et al.  Theoretical Developments in Electromagnetic Induction Geophysics with Selected Applications in the Near Surface , 2011, Surveys in Geophysics.

[25]  M. Chouteau,et al.  Geophysical characterization of contaminated urban fills , 2010 .

[26]  Philippe De Smedt,et al.  An efficient calibration procedure for correction of drift in EMI survey data , 2014 .

[27]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..