The use of dashboards in performance management : evidence from sales managers

The purpose of this paper is to identify and empirically examine the key features, purposes, uses, and benefits of performance dashboards. We find that only about a quarter of the sales managers surveyed1 in Finland used a dashboard, which was lower than previously reported. Dashboards were used for four distinct purposes: (i) monitoring, (ii) problem solving, (iii) rationalizing, and (iv) communication and consistency. There was a high correlation between the different uses of dashboards and user productivity indicating that dashboards were perceived as effective tools in performance management, not just for monitoring one‟s own performance but for other purposes including communication. The quality of the data in dashboards did not seem to be a concern (except for completeness) but it was a critical driver regarding its use. This is the first empirical study on performance dashboards in terms of adoption rates, key features, and benefits. The study highlights the research potential and benefits of dashboards, which could be valuable for future researchers and practitioners.

[1]  Bassil A. Yaghi,et al.  Enterprise Performance Management: The Global State of the Art , 2008 .

[2]  M. Vasarhelyi THE CONTINUOUS AUDIT OF ONLINE SYSTEMS , 1991 .

[3]  Yoram Wind Marketing as an engine of business growth: a cross-functional perspective ☆ , 2005 .

[4]  Graham Pervan,et al.  A critical analysis of decision support systems research , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[6]  Oana Velcu,et al.  A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[8]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[9]  William J. Doll,et al.  Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Wayne W. Eckerson Performance Dashboards: Measuring, Monitoring, and Managing Your Business , 2005 .

[12]  Gerald K. Debusk,et al.  Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[13]  Razvan Bologa,et al.  The use of multidimensional models to increase the efficiency of management support systems , 2011 .

[14]  Manish Bansal,et al.  Business Dashboards: A Visual Catalog for Design and Deployment , 2009 .

[15]  Narasimhaiah Gorla,et al.  Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Amanda Bryan Behind the wheel , 2012 .

[17]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Variations in Decision Makers' Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information , 1982 .

[18]  E. Wiersma For which purposes do managers use the balanced scorecard , 2009 .

[19]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination Within the Context of Data Warehousing , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Integrated decision support systems: A data warehousing perspective , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  F. R. Keller,et al.  Data Quality , 1990, Taxation and Labour Supply.

[22]  M. L. Bariff,et al.  Cognitive and Personality Tests for the Design of Management Information Systems , 1977 .

[23]  A. Miller,et al.  Measuring Marketing Effectiveness and Value: The Unisys Marketing Dashboard , 2004, Journal of Advertising Research.

[24]  G. Huber Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .