Estimating the expected number of crashes with traffic conflicts and the Lomax Distribution - A theoretical and numerical exploration.

This paper justifies the Lomax distribution for counterfactual modeling of the probability of crash given a traffic conflict. The pre-crash process leading to a conflict or a crash as the result of a failure is discussed as this conceptualization is the basis for proposing a simple model of the probability of a crash at the moment when a conflict is still progressing. Then, a model applicable to heterogeneous conditions is derived; and the model's relevance, useful properties, and limitations are discussed. The published concepts and study results that support the derived model are provided in the paper. The existing Maximum Likelihood Estimate (MLE) method and the Probability-Weighted Moments (PWM) method of estimating the probability of crash and the expected number of crashes based on the proposed theory are presented. Then, a new Single Parameter Estimation (SPE) method is proposed and evaluated with extensive Monte Carlo experiments. The performance of the MLE, PWM, and SPE methods are compared. The SPE method is found more accurate and efficient than the other two methods. Unlike the benchmark methods, the proposed method produces real estimates in each case. The most important outcome of the presented study is confirmation that traffic conflicts claimed based on sufficiently small threshold separation (such as Time to Collision) allow unbiased estimation of the expected number of crashes during the conflicts observation period. A practical procedure of estimating safety is proposed that identifies the longest suitable threshold separation for each case based on the trends in the estimation results.

[1]  Praprut Songchitruksa,et al.  The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions and some insights , 2014 .

[3]  Paul P Jovanis,et al.  Using naturalistic driving data to explore the association between traffic safety-related events and crash risk at driver level. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  S. Kotz,et al.  Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences , 2003 .

[5]  Richard L. Smith Extreme Value Analysis of Environmental Time Series: An Application to Trend Detection in Ground-Level Ozone , 1989 .

[6]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Probability Weighted Moments: Definition and Relation to Parameters of Several Distributions Expressable in Inverse Form , 1979 .

[7]  Santokh Singh,et al.  Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey , 2015 .

[8]  Dominique Lord,et al.  The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .

[10]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluations: the case of right-turn smart channels. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Shifted Gamma-Generalized Pareto Distribution model to map the safety continuum and estimate crashes , 2014 .

[12]  John Hourdos,et al.  Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Jin Zhang,et al.  A New and Efficient Estimation Method for the Generalized Pareto Distribution , 2009, Technometrics.

[14]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  Near Crashes as Crash Surrogate for Naturalistic Driving Studies , 2010 .

[15]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Freeway safety estimation using extreme value theory approaches: a comparative study. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Andrew P Tarko,et al.  Use of crash surrogates and exceedance statistics to estimate road safety. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  S. Grimshaw Computing Maximum Likelihood Estimates for the Generalized Pareto Distribution , 1993 .

[18]  A. Hadi,et al.  Fitting the Generalized Pareto Distribution to Data , 1997 .

[19]  K. Lomax Business Failures: Another Example of the Analysis of Failure Data , 1954 .

[20]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Traffic conflict standards for intersections , 1999 .

[21]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Modelling Excesses over High Thresholds, with an Application , 1984 .

[22]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts , 2013 .

[23]  Richard L. Smith Threshold Methods for Sample Extremes , 1984 .

[24]  Muhammad Ahsan ul Haq,et al.  Comparison of the robust parameters estimation methods for the two-parameters Lomax distribution , 2017 .

[25]  Richard L. Smith Maximum likelihood estimation in a class of nonregular cases , 1985 .

[26]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Traffic conflicts and exposure , 1982 .

[27]  J. Hosking,et al.  Parameter and quantile estimation for the generalized pareto distribution , 1987 .