Liver DCE-MRI Registration in Manifold Space Based on Robust Principal Component Analysis

A technical challenge in the registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging in the liver is intensity variations caused by contrast agents. Such variations lead to the failure of the traditional intensity-based registration method. To address this problem, a manifold-based registration framework for liver DCE-MR time series is proposed. We assume that liver DCE-MR time series are located on a low-dimensional manifold and determine intrinsic similarities between frames. Based on the obtained manifold, the large deformation of two dissimilar images can be decomposed into a series of small deformations between adjacent images on the manifold through gradual deformation of each frame to the template image along the geodesic path. Furthermore, manifold construction is important in automating the selection of the template image, which is an approximation of the geodesic mean. Robust principal component analysis is performed to separate motion components from intensity changes induced by contrast agents; the components caused by motion are used to guide registration in eliminating the effect of contrast enhancement. Visual inspection and quantitative assessment are further performed on clinical dataset registration. Experiments show that the proposed method effectively reduces movements while preserving the topology of contrast-enhancing structures and provides improved registration performance.

[1]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  On the Manifold Structure of the Space of Brain Images , 2009, MICCAI.

[2]  F. Deconinck,et al.  Information Processing in Medical Imaging , 1984, Springer Netherlands.

[3]  S Ourselin,et al.  The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Claude B. Sirlin,et al.  Automated registration of sequential breath-hold dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a comparison of three techniques. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[5]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Inflammatory breast cancer: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in patients receiving bevacizumab--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  G. Sapiro,et al.  A collaborative framework for 3D alignment and classification of heterogeneous subvolumes in cryo-electron tomography. , 2013, Journal of structural biology.

[8]  Christine Tanner,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  Michel Verleysen,et al.  Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction , 2021, Computer Vision.

[10]  Stefan Hougardy,et al.  The Floyd-Warshall algorithm on graphs with negative cycles , 2010, Inf. Process. Lett..

[11]  Michael Brady,et al.  Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  Yi Ma,et al.  The Augmented Lagrange Multiplier Method for Exact Recovery of Corrupted Low-Rank Matrices , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  Simon Ameer-Beg,et al.  Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro , 2008 .

[14]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  N. Hata,et al.  MICCAI , 2007 .

[16]  J. Gee,et al.  Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  Angela Caunce,et al.  Tracer kinetic model–driven registration for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI time‐series data , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Stefan Klein,et al.  PCA-based groupwise image registration for quantitative MRI , 2016, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  GRAM: A framework for geodesic registration on anatomical manifolds , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Guillermo Ayala,et al.  Evaluation of the registration of temporal series of contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance 3D images of the liver , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[21]  D. Collins,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion , 2004, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[22]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Intensity-Based Image Registration by Minimizing Residual Complexity , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  D Atkinson,et al.  Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a progressive principal component registration (PPCR) , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Julia A. Schnabel,et al.  A New Similarity Metric for Groupwise Registration of Variable Flip Angle Sequences for Improved T 10 Estimation in DCE-MRI , 2014, WBIR.

[26]  Emad Fatemizadeh,et al.  RISM: Single-Modal Image Registration via Rank-Induced Similarity Measure , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[28]  Mads Nielsen,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2006, 9th International Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 1-6, 2006, Proceedings, Part II , 2006, MICCAI.

[29]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Borivoj Vojnovic,et al.  Towards high-throughput FLIM for protein-protein interaction screening of live cells and tissue microarrays , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[32]  María J. Ledesma-Carbayo,et al.  Automatic motion compensation of free breathing acquired myocardial perfusion data by using independent component analysis , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[33]  Erlend Hodneland,et al.  Normalized gradient fields for nonlinear motion correction of DCE-MRI time series , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[34]  P. Tofts T 1-weighted DCE Imaging Concepts : Modelling , Acquisition and Analysis , 2010 .

[35]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Nonrigid registration of dynamic medical imaging data using nD + t B-splines and a groupwise optimization approach , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[36]  David Atkinson,et al.  Respiratory motion correction in dynamic MRI using robust data decomposition registration - Application to DCE-MRI , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[37]  Donald B. Johnson,et al.  A Note on Dijkstra's Shortest Path Algorithm , 1973, JACM.

[38]  C. Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of an automatic registration-based algorithm for direct measurement of volume change in tumors. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.