Intraprostatic fiducials for image guidance: Workflow implications in a single linac department

Abstract Purpose To assess the accuracy and implications on workflow of an online correction electronic portal imaging (EPI) protocol utilising bony anatomy in the online environment and an assessment of three implanted gold seed fiducial markers in the offline environment. This paper summarises an initial trial to establish the range of systematic and random errors present in patient set-up for both bony anatomy and fiducial markers, and to calculate optimal clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins. The impact of the introduction of such a technique was also assessed in terms of impact on workflow and resource management in a single machine unit (SMU). Methods and materials Pre treatment electronic portal images (EPIs) were acquired and bony anatomy was matched with CT derived digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). Intervention in field placement was made if field placement fell outside the range of 4mm on any of the orthogonal axes. In the offline environment the position of the implanted gold seed fiducials was aligned with that of the DRRs. An analysis of set-up error, total error and internal organ motion was then undertaken, with full statistical analysis of systematic and random errors. Results Eleven patients completed treatment as specified, with 1006 EPIs available for analysis. Treatment times were in the order of 10.4min. Set-up errors were in the order of 2.7mm right–left, 2.4mm sup–inf and 1.6mm ant–pst. These were reduced to 1.2mm, 0.7mm and 0.9mm respectively utilising an online correction protocol. However there was minimal impact on total error and internal organ motion. Using the data obtained in both the online and offline environments optimal CTV–PTV margins were calculated for correcting to bone, correcting to gold seed fiducials and also the possibility of EPI malfunction. Conclusions Daily targeting of the prostate is both technically feasible and can be carried out in an efficient and accurate manner. An online correction protocol using gold seeds as the matching mechanism provides the ability to significantly reduce treatment margins for most prostate patients, and importantly does not impact on a busy clinical workflow.

[1]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  V. Althof,et al.  Variation in prostate position relative to adjacent bony anatomy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  H Alasti,et al.  Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  H Shirato,et al.  Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Daniel W. Miller,et al.  Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[6]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  T Kron,et al.  Decision-making models in the analysis of portal films: a clinical pilot study. , 2000, Australasian radiology.

[8]  J. Crook,et al.  Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Measurement of patient positioning errors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Comparison of megavoltage position verification for prostate irradiation based on bony anatomy and implanted fiducials. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  D. Tremblay,et al.  Performing daily prostate targeting with a standard V-EPID and an automated radio-opaque marker detection algorithm. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  S Shalev On-line portal imaging: contributions and limitations in clinical practice. , 1996, Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology.

[15]  Lisa Grimm,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT-linear accelerator combination: prostate movements and dosimetric considerations. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  G S Bauman,et al.  Dosimetric impact of image-guided 3D conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  George Starkschall,et al.  Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  David A Jaffray,et al.  On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J Wong,et al.  Setup error in radiotherapy: on-line correction using electronic kilovoltage and megavoltage radiographs. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Technical aspects of daily online positioning of the prostate for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al.  Application of video imaging for improvement of patient set-up. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  P. Remeijer,et al.  Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. , 2001, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.