Program State Coverage: A Test Coverage Metric Based on Executed Program States
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Auri Marcelo Rizzo Vincenzi,et al. Toward the determination of sufficient mutant operators for C † , 2001, Softw. Test. Verification Reliab..
[2] Giovani Guizzo,et al. Evaluating Different Strategies for Reduction of Mutation Testing Costs , 2016, SAST.
[3] Reid Holmes,et al. Coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness , 2014, ICSE.
[4] Akbar Siami Namin,et al. Sufficient mutation operators for measuring test effectiveness , 2008, 2008 ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering.
[5] Anthony Ventresque,et al. Demo: PIT a Practical Mutation Testing Tool for Java , 2016 .
[6] M. Kendall. A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .
[7] Mark Harman,et al. An Analysis and Survey of the Development of Mutation Testing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[8] Michael D. Ernst,et al. Are mutants a valid substitute for real faults in software testing? , 2014, SIGSOFT FSE.
[9] Padmanabhan Krishnan,et al. Evaluating quality of security testing of the JDK , 2017, A-TEST@ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE.
[10] Frank Piessens,et al. State Coverage: Software Validation Metrics beyond Code Coverage , 2012, SOFSEM.
[11] Chen Fu,et al. CarFast: achieving higher statement coverage faster , 2012, SIGSOFT FSE.
[12] Tao Xie,et al. Is operator-based mutant selection superior to random mutant selection? , 2010, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering.
[13] Luciano Baresi,et al. An Introduction to Software Testing , 2006, FoVMT.
[14] Alex Groce,et al. Comparing non-adequate test suites using coverage criteria , 2013, ISSTA.
[15] Michael R. Lyu,et al. The effect of code coverage on fault detection under different testing profiles , 2005, A-MOST.