Anatomical Region-Specific In Vivo Wireless Communication Channel Characterization.

In vivo wireless body area networks and their associated technologies are shaping the future of healthcare by providing continuous health monitoring and noninvasive surgical capabilities, in addition to remote diagnostic and treatment of diseases. To fully exploit the potential of such devices, it is necessary to characterize the communication channel, which will help to build reliable and high-performance communication systems. This paper presents an in vivo wireless communication channel characterization for male torso both numerically and experimentally (on a human cadaver) considering various organs at 915 MHz and 2.4 GHz. A statistical path loss (PL) model is introduced, and the anatomical region-specific parameters are provided. It is found that the mean PL in decibel scale exhibits a linear decaying characteristic rather than an exponential decaying profile inside the body, and the power decay rate is approximately twice at 2.4 GHz as compared to 915 MHz. Moreover, the variance of shadowing increases significantly as the in vivo antenna is placed deeper inside the body since the main scatterers are present in the vicinity of the antenna. Multipath propagation characteristics are also investigated to facilitate proper waveform designs in the future wireless healthcare systems, and a root-mean-square delay spread of 2.76 ns is observed at 5 cm depth. Results show that the in vivo channel exhibit different characteristics than the classical communication channels, and location dependence is very critical for accurate, reliable, and energy-efficient link budget calculations.

[1]  Erchin Serpedin,et al.  Experimental Characterization of In Vivo Wireless Communication Channels , 2015, 2015 IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2015-Fall).

[2]  Tharaka A. Lamahewa,et al.  Propagation Models for Body-Area Networks: A Survey and New Outlook , 2013, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[3]  Yang Hao,et al.  A novel tapered slot CPW-fed antenna for ultra-wideband applications and its on/off-body performance , 2007, 2007 International workshop on Antenna Technology: Small and Smart Antennas Metamaterials and Applications.

[4]  Yang Liu,et al.  In vivo wireless channel modeling , 2016 .

[5]  P. S. Hall,et al.  Antennas and Propagation for Body-Centric Wireless Communications at Millimeter-Wave Frequencies: A Review [Wireless Corner] , 2013, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[6]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Propagation models for IEEE 802.15.6 standardization of implant communication in body area networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  John C. Batchelor,et al.  Antennas and Propagation for Body-Centric Wireless Communications , 2012 .

[8]  Erchin Serpedin,et al.  In Vivo Communications: Steps Toward the Next Generation of Implantable Devices , 2016, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[9]  Ho-Yu Lin,et al.  Characteristics of Electric Field and Radiation Pattern on Different Locations of the Human Body for In-Body Wireless Communication , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[10]  Yang Hao,et al.  On-Body Radio Channel Characterization and System-Level Modeling for Multiband OFDM Ultra-Wideband Body-Centric Wireless Network , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[11]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[12]  Y. Hao,et al.  Modeling and Characterization of Biotelemetric Radio Channel From Ingested Implants Considering Organ Contents , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[13]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[14]  Judith E. Terrill,et al.  Channel Models for Medical Implant Communication , 2010, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.

[15]  M A Stuchly,et al.  Dielectric properties of animal tissues in vivo at radio and microwave frequencies: comparison between species. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Experimental Path Loss Models for In-Body Communications Within 2.36-2.5 GHz , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[18]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Implant UWB-IR Transmission With Living Animal for Body Area Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[19]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  In-Body to On-Body Ultrawideband Propagation Model Derived From Measurements in Living Animals , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[20]  Hüseyin Arslan,et al.  Bio-inspired filter banks for SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces , 2016, 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI).

[21]  Yang Hao,et al.  Numerical Characterization and Link Budget Evaluation of Wireless Implants Considering Different Digital Human Phantoms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[22]  G. Vermeeren,et al.  In-body Path Loss Model for Homogeneous Human Tissues , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[23]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  Ultra-wideband statistical propagation channel model for implant sensors in the human chest , 2011 .

[24]  Md. Rubel Basar,et al.  The use of a human body model to determine the variation of path losses in the human body channel in wireless capsule endoscopy , 2013 .

[25]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: A survey and outlook , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[26]  Erchin Serpedin,et al.  Numerical characterization of in vivo wireless communication channels , 2014, 2014 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on RF and Wireless Technologies for Biomedical and Healthcare Applications (IMWS-Bio2014).