Testing Global Positioning System Performance for Wildlife Monitoring Using Mobile Collars and Known Reference Points

Abstract To determine the spatial resolution of Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver data, rigorous testing is essential. We tested performance of the Lotek 3300 GPS collar for medium-sized mammals (Lotek Engineering, Inc., Newmarket, ON, Canada). To mimic real wildlife monitoring situations, we performed both static (stationary receiver) and mobile tests, placing the receiver collar on a dog. We compared fix locations of the mobile receiver with the actual trajectory described by a portable Trimble high-precision GPS. We determined performance in relation to habitat type and leaf cover. Location error was habitat-dependent, with the best results in open habitat and much poorer ones in forest, particularly coniferous-dominated forest. For both static and mobile tests, location accuracy was higher when the number of satellites contacted was high and when the residual positional dilution of precision (PDOP) value was low. However, location error was highly variable, even for a given PDOP value and a given number of satellites contacted. Finally, mobile collars performed less well than their static counterparts, presumably because of frequent changes of GPS position and orientation.

[1]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[2]  Robert E. Kenward,et al.  RANGES V: an analysis system for biological location data , 1996 .

[3]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction , 1997 .

[4]  Lars Edenius,et al.  Field test of a GPS location system for moose Alces alces under Scandinavian boreal conditions , 1997, Wildlife Biology.

[5]  L. Mech,et al.  The usefulness of GPS telemetry to study wolf circadian and social activity , 2003 .

[6]  Donna Delparte,et al.  Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening , 2005 .

[7]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Expectations and realities of GPS animal location collars: results of three years in the field , 2002, Wildlife Biology.

[8]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Uncontrolled field performance of Televilt GPS-Simplex™ collars on grizzly bears in western and northern Canada , 2004 .

[9]  Christopher O. Kochanny,et al.  GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain , 2002 .

[10]  Bruce D. Leopold,et al.  Evaluation of a GPS collar for white-tailed deer. , 2000 .

[11]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[12]  Georges Janeau,et al.  ASSESSING REAL DAILY DISTANCE TRAVELED BY UNGULATES USING DIFFERENTIAL GPS LOCATIONS , 2004 .

[13]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  Recent Telemetry Technology , 2001 .

[14]  I. Hulbert,et al.  The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping , 2001 .

[15]  R. Rempel,et al.  Effects of differential correction on accuracy of a GPS animal location system , 1997 .

[16]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance , 1996 .

[17]  Tabitha A. Graves,et al.  Understanding the Causes of Missed Global Positioning System Telemetry Fixes , 2006 .

[18]  Christophe Adrados,et al.  Global Positioning System (GPS) location accuracy improvement due to selective availability removal. , 2002, Comptes rendus biologies.

[19]  François Klein,et al.  Can wild boar be surveyed using GPS , 2004 .

[20]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A GPS ANIMAL LOCATION SYSTEM UNDER BOREAL FOREST CANOPY , 1995 .

[21]  J. P. Vincent,et al.  Les effets du derangement par l'homme, de la structure des zones boisees, des friches et des prairies sur la distribution du chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) dans une region agricole , 1998 .

[22]  Gary C. White,et al.  Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data , 1990 .

[23]  J. Joachim,et al.  Performance of differential GPS collars in temperate mountain forest. , 2004, Comptes rendus biologies.

[24]  R. Schaefer,et al.  Performance of two GPS telemetry collars under different habitat conditions , 2003 .

[25]  P. Krausman,et al.  Influence of topography and GPS fix interval on GPS collar performance , 2005 .

[26]  Georges Janeau,et al.  GPS approach to study fine-scale site use by wild red deer during active and inactive behaviors , 2003 .

[27]  J. Squires,et al.  Effect of forest canopy on GPS-based movement data , 2005 .

[28]  R. Courtois,et al.  Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations , 2002 .

[29]  David Reby,et al.  Space use by roe deer in a fragmented landscape some preliminary results , 2002, Revue d'Écologie (La Terre et La Vie).

[30]  William Barbour,et al.  Delineating Canadian and Greenland polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations by cluster analysis of movements , 2001 .

[31]  Aurélie Coulon.  Etude de l'influence du paysage sur la dispersion du chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) en milieu fragmenté , 2006 .