Mezias and Starbuck (2003) review previous work and report striking new evidence indicating that managers can be quite mistaken in their perceptions regarding some matters, even matters quite close to their jobs. This is reminiscent of much evidence on politicians and ordinary citizens that generally show a weak grip on basic facts. In assessing how much difference this weakness makes, it is useful to distinguish among four perspectives on managers as: (i) informants for academic research; (ii) performers of their normal work; (iii) problem-solvers in novel situations; (iv) strategic thinkers. Mezias and Starbuck's results suggest a negative assessment on (i) and (iii), but are less clearly relevant on (ii); some open questions regarding (iv) are put forward.
[1]
S. Asch.
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority.
,
1956
.
[2]
E. Hutchins.
Cognition in the wild
,
1995
.
[3]
Dan Lovallo,et al.
Rational Entrepreneurs or Optimistic Martyrs? Some Considerations on Technological Regimes, Corporate Entries, and the Evolutionary Role of Decision Biases
,
1997
.
[4]
Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY?
,
2000
.
[5]
S. Winter,et al.
Evolutionary theorizing in economics
,
2002
.
[6]
John M. Mezias,et al.
Studying the Accuracy of Managers' Perceptions: A Research Odyssey
,
2003
.