Is the Error-related Negativity Amplitude Related to Error Detectability? Evidence from Effects of Different Error Types

The present study tested error detection theories of the error-related negativity (ERN) by investigating the relation between ERN amplitude and error detectability. To this end, ERN amplitudes were compared with a behavioral measure of error detectability across two different error types in a four-choice flanker task. If an erroneous response was associated with the flankers, it was considered a flanker error, otherwise it was considered a nonflanker error. Two experiments revealed that, whereas detectability was better for nonflanker errors than for flanker errors, ERN amplitudes were larger for flanker errors than for nonflanker errors. Moreover, undetected errors led to strongly reduced ERN amplitudes relative to detected errors. These results suggest that, although error detection is necessary for an ERN to occur, the ERN amplitude is not related to error detectability but rather to error significance.

[1]  R. Simons,et al.  Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[3]  P. Rabbitt.  Time to detect errors as a function of factors affecting choice-response time. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[4]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[5]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[6]  N. Yeung,et al.  On the ERN and the significance of errors. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[7]  P M Rabbitt,et al.  Three Kinds of Error-Signalling Responses in a Serial Choice Task , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Modeling behavioral measures of error detection in choice tasks: response monitoring versus conflict monitoring. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jan R. Wessel,et al.  Modulation of the error-related negativity by response conflict. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[10]  M. Coles,et al.  "Where did I go wrong?" A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  C. Carter,et al.  The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[13]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[15]  D. Tucker,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex in Action Monitoring , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Error Monitoring Using External Feedback: Specific Roles of the Habenular Complex, the Reward System, and the Cingulate Motor Area Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[18]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Consciousness is slower than you think , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Brunia,et al.  Psychophysiological brain research. , 1993 .

[24]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  How does error correction differ from error signaling? An event-related potential study , 2006, Brain Research.

[25]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[26]  C. Carter,et al.  The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Processing a Display Even after you Make a Response to it. How Perceptual Errors can be Corrected , 1981, Cognitive Development and the Ageing Process.

[28]  M. Coles,et al.  Performance monitoring in a confusing world: error-related brain activity, judgments of response accuracy, and types of errors. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Norbert Kathmann,et al.  Neural correlates of error awareness , 2007, NeuroImage.

[30]  B. Meier,et al.  Advances in Cognitive Psychology , 2022 .

[31]  David Goodman,et al.  Performance Monitoring in the Anterior Cingulate is Not All Error Related: Expectancy Deviation and the Representation of Action-Outcome Associations , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The Anterior Cingulate and Error Avoidance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  T. Endrass,et al.  Error Awareness in a Saccade Countermanding Task , 2005 .

[34]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[35]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Response-based strengthening in task shifting: evidence from shift effects produced by errors. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.