Enamel Ultrastructure of Multituberculate Mammals: An Investigation of Variability

-The nature and extent of enamel ultrastructural variation in mammals has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study we attempt to identify and evaluate the sources of variability in enamel ultrastructural pa t t e rns a t a number of hierarchic levels within t h e extinct order Multituberculata. These levels include: 1) different positions on a single tooth; 2) different depths and orientations of a prepared enamel surface; 3) different teeth from a single individual; 4) isolated teeth assigned to a single species; 5) between congeneric species; 6) between genera; and 7) within suprageneric taxa. Nearly all of the specimens examined can be unambiguously characterized by one of two major ultrastructural types: large (X diameter = 8.2 pm, N = 32, sd = 1.36), arcade-shaped prisms or small (X diameter = 3.6 pm, N = 28, sd = 0.77), circular prisms. Consistent variation in these two types appears only at the level of intergeneric comparisons and above; variation in prism size and shape below this level exists, but is negligible relative to the higher order variation. An analysis of prism spacing and density reveals that small, circular prisms are relatively numerous and closely-spaced per unit area while large, arcade-shaped prisms are relatively few and far between per unit area. In general, there is more interprismatic material between circular prisms, despite their small size. We also compared various modes of preparation used to reveal ultrastructural patterns, and the ways in which patterns have been previously characterized and compared. Our review of Late Cretaceous and early Tertiary multituberculates reveals remarkable consistency in ultrastructural type at the subordinal level. All of the 13 recognized ptilodontoid genera were examined; all but two (Cimolodon and Boffius) possess small, circular prisms that are numerous and closely-spaced. Twelve of 20 recognized taeniolabidoid genera were examined; all but three (Neoliotomus, Xyronomys, and Microcosmodon) possess large, arcade-shaped prisms that are few in number and widely-spaced. Specimens of the taeniolabidoid genus Microcosmodon are unique among multituberculates in having small prisms that are either circular or arcade-shaped. All but one ( Viridomys) of the seven genera currently classified as Suborder incertae sedis possess large, arcade-shaped prisms. ' Department of Geological Sciences and Museum of Paleontology. '1 he l!niversity of M~chigan. Ann Arbor . Department of Anatomical Sciences. Health Sciences Center, State University of New York. Stony Brook.

[1]  Lawrence B. Martin,et al.  The Microstructure of Primate Dental Enamel , 1984 .

[2]  F. Jenkins,et al.  Adaptations for Climbing in North American Multituberculates (Mammalia) , 1983, Science.

[3]  A. Thylstrup,et al.  The development of enamel structure in rat incisors as compared to the teeth of monkey and man , 1981, The Anatomical record.

[4]  Z. Kielan-Jaworowska Absence of ptilodontoidean multituberculates from Asia and its palaeogeographic implications , 1980 .

[5]  A. Sahni Enamel ultrastructure of certain North American cretaceous mammals , 1979 .

[6]  R. E. Sloan,et al.  Prism Size in Tooth Enamel of Some Late Cretaceous Mammals and Its Value in Multituberculate Taxonomy , 1978 .

[7]  E. Vrba,et al.  Australopithecine enamel prism patterns. , 1978, Science.

[8]  D. Pilbeam,et al.  Hominoid enamel prism patterns. , 1977, Science.

[9]  D. Gantt Enamel of primate teeth : its thickness and structure with reference to functional and phyletic implications , 1977 .

[10]  G. Fosse,et al.  The origin of marsupial enamel tubules. , 1974, Acta anatomica.

[11]  Ronald B. Parker,et al.  Minor Elements in Fossil Bone , 1970 .

[12]  J. W. Osborn Evaluation of Previous Assessments of Prism Directions in Human Enamel , 1968, Journal of dental research.

[13]  R. E. Sloan,et al.  Cretaceous Mammals from Montana , 1965, Science.

[14]  G. Fosse The Number of Prism Bases on the Inner and Outer Surface of the Enamel Mantle of Human Teeth , 1964, Journal of dental research.

[15]  Elizabeth B. Jaffe,et al.  Physical and chemical comparison of modern and fossil tooth and bone material , 1951 .

[16]  COMPARATIVE ODONTOLOGY , 1937 .

[17]  W. Gross Fossilium Catalogus. I, Animalia. Pars 57: W. Gross, Antiarchi , 1932 .