A comparison of two iterations of a software studio course based on continuous integration

In previous work we introduced a software studio course in which seventy students used continuous integration practices to collaborate on a common legacy code base. This enabled students to experience the issues of realistically sized software projects, and learn and apply appropriate techniques to overcome them, in a course without significant extra staffing. Although the course was broadly successful in its goals, it received a mixed response from students, and our paper noted several issues to overcome. This paper considers experimental changes to the course in light of our previous findings, and additional data from the official student surveys. Two iterations of the course and their respective results are compared. Whereas our previous paper addressed the feasibility of such a course, this paper considers how the student experience can be improved. The paper also considers how such a course can be adapted for more heterogeneous cohorts, such as the introduction of an unknown number of design and database students, or the introduction of online students.

[1]  Stephen H. Edwards,et al.  Exploring influences on student adherence to test-driven development , 2012, ITiCSE '12.

[2]  Angela Carbone,et al.  A studio-based teaching and learning model in IT: what do first year students think? , 2002, ITiCSE '02.

[3]  Stefan Brandle,et al.  Software studio: teaching professional software engineering , 2011, SIGCSE.

[4]  James E. Tomayko,et al.  Teaching software development in a studio environment , 1991, SIGCSE.

[5]  Janet Hughes,et al.  Assessing undergraduate experience of continuous integration and test-driven development , 2006, ICSE.

[6]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Chapter XIII Intelligent Books: Combining Reactive Learning Exercises with Extensible and Adaptive Content in an Open-Access Web Application , 2009 .

[7]  Fazel Naghdy,et al.  The case for ICT work-integrated learning from graduates in the workplace , 2010, ACE '10.

[8]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  Does studio-based instruction work in CS 1?: an empirical comparison with a traditional approach , 2010, SIGCSE.

[9]  Margot Brereton,et al.  An innovative design and studio-based CS degree , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[10]  Robert Cartwright,et al.  Production programming in the classroom , 2003, SIGCSE.

[11]  Jörn Guy Süß,et al.  Using continuous integration of code and content to teach software engineering with limited resources , 2012, 2012 34th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).

[12]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Implementing studio-based learning in CS2 , 2010, SIGCSE.