Computational Systems Biology and Dose-Response Modeling in Relation to New Directions in Toxicity Testing

The new paradigm envisioned for toxicity testing in the 21st century advocates shifting from the current animal-based testing process to a combination of in vitro cell-based studies, high-throughput techniques, and in silico modeling. A strategic component of the vision is the adoption of the systems biology approach to acquire, analyze, and interpret toxicity pathway data. As key toxicity pathways are identified and their wiring details elucidated using traditional and high-throughput techniques, there is a pressing need to understand their qualitative and quantitative behaviors in response to perturbation by both physiological signals and exogenous stressors. The complexity of these molecular networks makes the task of understanding cellular responses merely by human intuition challenging, if not impossible. This process can be aided by mathematical modeling and computer simulation of the networks and their dynamic behaviors. A number of theoretical frameworks were developed in the last century for understanding dynamical systems in science and engineering disciplines. These frameworks, which include metabolic control analysis, biochemical systems theory, nonlinear dynamics, and control theory, can greatly facilitate the process of organizing, analyzing, and understanding toxicity pathways. Such analysis will require a comprehensive examination of the dynamic properties of “network motifs”—the basic building blocks of molecular circuits. Network motifs like feedback and feedforward loops appear repeatedly in various molecular circuits across cell types and enable vital cellular functions like homeostasis, all-or-none response, memory, and biological rhythm. These functional motifs and associated qualitative and quantitative properties are the predominant source of nonlinearities observed in cellular dose response data. Complex response behaviors can arise from toxicity pathways built upon combinations of network motifs. While the field of computational cell biology has advanced rapidly with increasing availability of new data and powerful simulation techniques, a quantitative orientation is still lacking in life sciences education to make efficient use of these new tools to implement the new toxicity testing paradigm. A revamped undergraduate curriculum in the biological sciences including compulsory courses in mathematics and analysis of dynamical systems is required to address this gap. In parallel, dissemination of computational systems biology techniques and other analytical tools among practicing toxicologists and risk assessment professionals will help accelerate implementation of the new toxicity testing vision.

[1]  K. Bock,et al.  Coordinate regulation of Phase I and II xenobiotic metabolisms by the Ah receptor and Nrf2. , 2007, Biochemical pharmacology.

[2]  Julia S Kimbell,et al.  Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat. , 2003, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  U Alon,et al.  The incoherent feed-forward loop accelerates the response-time of the gal system of Escherichia coli. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  Dose Response Relationship in Anti-Stress Gene Regulatory Networks , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[6]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[7]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  A systems biology perspective on Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[8]  S. Mangan,et al.  The coherent feedforward loop serves as a sign-sensitive delay element in transcription networks. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  J. Tyson,et al.  Modelling the controls of the eukaryotic cell cycle. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.

[10]  James R. Johnson,et al.  Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[11]  M. Meehan General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications , 1969 .

[12]  E. Davidson,et al.  Global regulatory logic for specification of an embryonic cell lineage , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J E Ferrell,et al.  The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. , 1998, Science.

[14]  Steven O Simmons,et al.  Cellular stress response pathway system as a sentinel ensemble in toxicological screening. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[15]  R Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. Critique of the crossover theorem and a general procedure to identify interaction sites with an effector. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[16]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Biochemical systems theory and metabolic control theory: 1. fundamental similarities and differences , 1987 .

[17]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Modeling a Snap-Action, Variable-Delay Switch Controlling Extrinsic Cell Death , 2008, PLoS biology.

[18]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  Y. Kan,et al.  Induction of murine NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin requires the CNC (cap 'n' collar) basic leucine zipper transcription factor Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2): cross-interaction between AhR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) and Nrf2 signal transduc , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[20]  D. Gillespie The chemical Langevin equation , 2000 .

[21]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[22]  D. Fell Understanding the Control of Metabolism , 1996 .

[23]  F. A. Smith,et al.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride. , 1987, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[24]  Daniel B. Forger,et al.  A detailed predictive model of the mammalian circadian clock , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  W. Lutz,et al.  A true threshold dose in chemical carcinogenesis cannot be defined for a population, irrespective of the mode of action , 2000, Human & experimental toxicology.

[26]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[27]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  D. Botstein,et al.  Back to the future: education for systems-level biologists , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[30]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Ervin Laszlo,et al.  The Systems View of the World: A Holistic Vision for Our Time , 1996 .

[32]  U. Epa Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment , 1986 .

[33]  E O Voit,et al.  Canonical modeling: review of concepts with emphasis on environmental health. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Phase I to II cross-induction of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes: a feedforward control mechanism for potential hormetic responses. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[35]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  Dose-dependent transitions in Nrf2-mediated adaptive response and related stress responses to hypochlorous acid in mouse macrophages. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[36]  M. Andersen,et al.  Ultrasensitive Response Motifs in Biochemical Networks , 2010 .

[37]  J. Tyson,et al.  The dynamics of cell cycle regulation. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[38]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  A. Janetos A New Biology for the 21st Century , 2009 .

[40]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. II. The steady-state solutions for an n-pool system using a power-law approximation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[42]  Hana El-Samad,et al.  Regulated degradation is a mechanism for suppressing stochastic fluctuations in gene regulatory networks. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[43]  M. Merrow,et al.  The Network of Time: Understanding the Molecular Circadian System , 2003, Current Biology.

[44]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[45]  K. Bock,et al.  Activation of coupled Ah receptor and Nrf2 gene batteries by dietary phytochemicals in relation to chemoprevention. , 2006, Biochemical pharmacology.

[46]  Julia S Kimbell,et al.  Human respiratory tract cancer risks of inhaled formaldehyde: dose-response predictions derived from biologically-motivated computational modeling of a combined rodent and human dataset. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[47]  J. Tyson,et al.  Design principles of biochemical oscillators , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[48]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2007 .

[49]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  John C. Doyle,et al.  Surviving heat shock: control strategies for robustness and performance. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  M. Andersen,et al.  Bistable Signaling Motifs and Cell Fate Decisions , 2010 .

[52]  Charlotte M. Deane,et al.  Functionally guided alignment of protein interaction networks for module detection , 2009, Bioinform..

[53]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Modular response analysis of cellular regulatory networks. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[54]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[55]  Yiannis Kaznessis,et al.  Accurate hybrid stochastic simulation of a system of coupled chemical or biochemical reactions. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[56]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Quantification of information transfer via cellular signal transduction pathways , 1997, FEBS letters.

[57]  Pedro de Atauri,et al.  Metabolic control analysis in drug discovery and disease , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[58]  Susana R. Neves,et al.  Design Logic of a Cannabinoid Receptor Signaling Network That Triggers Neurite Outgrowth , 2008, Science.

[59]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  General System Theory , 1969 .

[61]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli , 2004, Nature.

[62]  U. Alon Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[63]  D B Kell,et al.  Oscillations in NF-kappaB signaling control the dynamics of gene expression. , 2004, Science.

[64]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[65]  M. Savageau Biochemical systems analysis. III. Dynamic solutions using a power-law approximation , 1970 .

[66]  Gürol M. Süel,et al.  An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation , 2006, Nature.

[67]  James E Ferrell,et al.  Q&A: Cooperativity , 2009, Journal of biology.

[68]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models , 2003, Bioinform..

[69]  H J Clewell,et al.  Comparison of cancer risk estimates for vinyl chloride using animal and human data with a PBPK model. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[70]  I. Shmulevich,et al.  Dynamic analysis of MAPK signaling using a high-throughput microfluidic single-cell imaging platform , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  J. Tyson,et al.  Modelling the fission yeast cell cycle. , 2004, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[72]  M A Savageau Optimal design of feedback control by inhibition: dynamic considerations. , 1975, Journal of molecular evolution.

[73]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[74]  Chi-Ying F. Huang,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  U. Alon,et al.  Just-in-time transcription program in metabolic pathways , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[76]  J. Tyson,et al.  Mathematical model of the cell division cycle of fission yeast. , 2001, Chaos.

[77]  Steven H. Strogatz,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos , 2024 .

[78]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[79]  A. U.S Ultrasensitivity in Biochemical Systems Controlled by Covalent Modification , 2022 .

[80]  Judith A. Curry,et al.  Impact of Shifting Patterns of Pacific Ocean Warming on North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones , 2009, Science.

[81]  E D Sontag,et al.  Some new directions in control theory inspired by systems biology. , 2004, Systems biology.

[82]  C. Klaassen,et al.  Introducing the "TCDD-inducible AhR-Nrf2 gene battery". , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[83]  D. Koshland,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in biochemical systems controlled by covalent modification. Interplay between zero-order and multistep effects. , 1984, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[84]  David R Walt,et al.  Living bacterial cell array for genotoxin monitoring. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[85]  T. Pawson,et al.  Cell Signaling in Space and Time: Where Proteins Come Together and When They’re Apart , 2009, Science.

[86]  E O Voit,et al.  Utility of Biochemical Systems Theory for the Analysis of Metabolic Effects from Low‐Dose Chemical Exposure , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[87]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Circuits: Predicting Numbers from Alphabets , 2009, Science.

[88]  K. F. Tipton,et al.  Biochemical systems analysis: A study of function and design in molecular biology , 1978 .

[89]  H. Westerhoff,et al.  Control theory of regulatory cascades. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[90]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[91]  H. Yanagi,et al.  Heat-Induced Synthesis of ς32 inEscherichia coli: Structural and Functional Dissection ofrpoH mRNA Secondary Structure , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[92]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Transcriptional Dynamics of the Embryonic Stem Cell Switch , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[93]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[94]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  Network Features of the Mammalian Circadian Clock , 2009, PLoS biology.

[95]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[96]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Multistable and multistep dynamics in neutrophil differentiation , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[97]  Avi Ma’ayan Insights into the Organization of Biochemical Regulatory Networks Using Graph Theory Analyses* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[98]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: The implicit tau-leaping method , 2003 .

[99]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002, Science.

[100]  Yu-Mei Tan,et al.  Biologically motivated computational modeling of chloroform cytolethality and regenerative cellular proliferation. , 2003, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[101]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[102]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  MAP Kinase Phosphatase As a Locus of Flexibility in a Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Network , 2002, Science.

[103]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Biochemical systems theory and metabolic control theory: 2. the role of summation and connectivity relationships , 1987 .

[104]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Role of Core Biological Motifs in Dose–Response Modeling: An Example with Switchlike Circuits , 2011 .

[105]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[106]  Michael A. Savageau,et al.  Design principles for elementary gene circuits: Elements, methods, and examples. , 2001, Chaos.

[107]  H. Kitano Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[108]  Karen Lowrie,et al.  Toxicity testing in the 21st century. , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[109]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  A bistable switch underlying B-cell differentiation and its disruption by the environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[110]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[111]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2007, Nature.