Should results of ultrasound Doppler studies be reported in units of frequency or velocity?

There is a current tendency to report the results of ultrasound Doppler studies in units of velocity instead of Doppler frequency. This is probably motivated by the intuitive feeling that blood flow studies should naturally be reported in cm/s and the notion that "velocity" is a normalizing factor for Doppler ultrasound studies. In order to determine velocity, the Doppler angle theta or angle formed by the ultrasound beam and flow velocity vector, must be known. It is not possible, using currently available systems, to obtain an accurate estimate of this angle. The physics related to the Doppler equation are reviewed in this paper along with examples to illustrate the origin and magnitude of errors that could arise when reporting in units of velocity. Guidelines are provided for thinking about and reporting results of Doppler studies in units of velocity. An understanding of the Doppler equation and its use in clinical studies are promoted in this paper to enhance the diagnostic usefulness of Doppler ultrasound studies and to reduce serious errors which could lead to faulty information dictating patient management.

[1]  R. Gill Pulsed Doppler with B-mode imaging for quantitative blood flow measurement. , 1979, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  P. Chikos,et al.  Ultrasonic Duplex Scanning for Disease of the Carotid Artery , 1981, Circulation.

[3]  K. Beach,et al.  The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. , 1984, Stroke.

[4]  H. Goldsmith,et al.  Particle flow behaviour in models of branching vessels: I. Vortices in 90 degrees T-junctions. , 1979, Biorheology.

[5]  L Hatle,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1980, British heart journal.

[6]  L Hatle,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. , 1978, British heart journal.

[7]  Donald W. Baker,et al.  Duplex Scanner II: for Simultaneous Imaging of Artery Tissues and Flow , 1974 .

[8]  K W Beach,et al.  Evaluating carotid artery disease. The concordance between pulsed Doppler/spectrum analysis and angiography. , 1983, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  S Simonsen,et al.  Determination of Pressure Gradient in Mitral Stenosis with a Non‐invasive Ultrasound Doppler Technique , 2009 .

[10]  W. Zwiebel,et al.  Spectrum analysis in carotid sonography. , 1987, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  K B Chandran,et al.  Physiological pulsatile flow experiments in a model of the human aortic arch. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  D J Phillips,et al.  Detection of peripheral vascular disease using the Duplex Scanner III. , 1980, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  D J Phillips,et al.  Detection of carotid occlusive disease by ultrasonic imaging and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. , 1979, Surgery.

[14]  D J Phillips,et al.  Hemodynamics of the normal human carotid bifurcation: in vitro and in vivo studies. , 1985, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  G. Thomas Calculus and Analytic Geometry , 1953 .