Improving the accounting of field emissions in the carbon footprint of agricultural products: a comparison of default IPCC methods with readily available medium-effort modeling approaches

PurposeThe estimations of greenhouse gas (GHG) field emissions from fertilization and soil carbon changes are challenges associated with calculating the carbon footprint (CFP) of agricultural products. At the regional level, the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006a) Tier 1 approach, based on default emission factors, insufficiently accounts for emission variability resulting from pedo-climatic conditions or management practices. However, Tier 2 and 3 approaches are usually considered too complex to be practicable. In this paper, we discuss different readily available medium-effort methods to improve the accuracy of GHG emission estimates.MethodsWe present four case studies—two wheat crops in Germany and two peach orchards in Italy—to test the performance of Tier 1, 2, and 3 methodologies and compare the estimated results with available field measurements. The methodologies selected at Tier 2 and Tier 3 level are characterized by simple implementation and data collection, for which only a medium level of effort for stakeholders is required. The Tier 2 method consists of calculating direct and indirect N2O, emissions from fertilization with a multivariate empirical model which accounts for pedo-climatic and crop management conditions. The Tier 3 method entails simulation of soil carbon stock change using the Rothamsted carbon model.Results and discussionRelevant differences were found among the tested methodologies: in all case studies, the Tier 1 approach exceeded the Tier 2 estimations for fertilizer-induced emissions (up to +50 %) and the measurements. Using this higher Tier approach reduced the estimated CFP calculation of annual crops by 4 and 21 % and that of the perennial crop by 7 %. Removals related to positive soil carbon change calculated using the Tier 1 approach also exceeded the Tier 3 calculations for the studied annual crops (up to +90 %) but considerably underrated the Tier 3 estimations and measurements for perennial crops (−75 %). In this case, the impact of the selected Tier method on the final CFP results was even more relevant: an increase of 194 and 88 % for the studied annual crops and a decrease of 67 % for the perennial crop case study.ConclusionsThe use of higher Tiers for the estimation of land-based emissions is strongly recommended to improve the accuracy of the CFP results. The suggested medium-effort methods tested in this study represent a good compromise between complexity reduction and accuracy improvement and can be considered reliable for the assessment of GHG mitigation potentials.

[1]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[2]  양민선.  IPCC(Intergovernmental Panel on climate Change) 외 , 2008 .

[3]  D. L. Heanes.  Determination of total organic‐C in soils by an improved chromic acid digestion and spectrophotometric procedure , 1984 .

[4]  B. M. Petersen,et al.  An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments , 2013 .

[5]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[6]  Benoit Gabrielle,et al.  Process‐based modeling of nitrous oxide emissions from wheat‐cropped soils at the subregional scale , 2006 .

[7]  Alessandro Kim Cerutti,et al.  Application of Ecological Footprint Analysis on nectarine production: methodological issues and results from a case study in Italy , 2010 .

[8]  Pete Smith,et al.  Simulating SOC changes in long‐term experiments with RothC and CENTURY: model evaluation for a regional scale application , 2002 .

[9]  Niels H. Batjes,et al.  Estimation of global NH3 volatilization loss from synthetic fertilizers and animal manure applied to arable lands and grasslands , 2002 .

[10]  Vincenzo Tabaglio.  Gestione del suolo , 2013 .

[11]  J. G. Buwalda,et al.  The carbon costs of root systems of perennial fruit crops , 1993 .

[12]  Claudine Basset-Mens,et al.  LCA applied to perennial cropping systems: a review focused on the farm stage , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  N. Batjes,et al.  Modeling global annual N2O and NO emissions from fertilized fields , 2002 .

[14]  E. Davidson,et al.  Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. , 1989 .

[15]  M.,et al.  Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the RothC model , 2007 .

[16]  Jean-François Soussana,et al.  Identity-based estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production: Case study from Denmark , 2012 .

[17]  S. Ogle,et al.  Towards an integrated global framework to assess the impacts of land use and management change on soil carbon: current capability and future vision , 2012 .

[18]  Jörg Richter,et al.  Calibration of a simple method for determining ammonia volatilization in the field – comparative measurements in Henan Province, China , 2006, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[19]  Assaad Zoughaib,et al.  Origins of the debate on the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of first-generation biofuels – A sensitivity analysis approach , 2012 .

[20]  A. Cerutti,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment in the Fruit Sector , 2015 .

[21]  G. Celano,et al.  Net CO2 storage in mediterranean olive and peach orchards , 2005 .

[22]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[23]  R. Lal,et al.  Conservation tillage for carbon sequestration , 1997, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[24]  T. Rehl,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas—Attributional vs. consequential approach , 2012 .

[25]  Zhengqin Xiong,et al.  Greenhouse Gases from Crop Fields , 2009 .

[26]  Helmut Döhler,et al.  Faustzahlen für die Landwirtschaft , 2009 .

[27]  Frank Brentrup,et al.  Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector , 2000 .

[28]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  Exchange of trace gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere , 2004, Plant Growth Regulation.

[29]  Niels H. Batjes,et al.  Emissions of N2O and NO from fertilized fields: Summary of available measurement data , 2002 .

[30]  Cristos Xiloyannis,et al.  Soil management affects carbon dynamics and yield in a Mediterranean peach orchard , 2012 .

[31]  U. Sonesson,et al.  4 – Life cycle assessment of fruit production , 2003 .

[32]  Janet Rethemeyer,et al.  Predictive modelling of C dynamics in the long‐term fertilization experiment at Bad Lauchstädt with the Rothamsted Carbon Model , 2007 .

[33]  Kevin Coleman,et al.  Estimating the size of the inert organic matter pool from total soil organic carbon content for use in the Rothamsted Carbon Model , 1998 .

[34]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  Modeling crop rotation in agricultural LCAs — Challenges and potential solutions , 2015 .

[35]  Andrew P. Whitmore,et al.  Modification of the RothC model for simulations of soil organic C dynamics in dryland regions , 2013 .

[36]  A. Whitmore,et al.  Spatially explicit modelling of changes in soil organic C in agricultural soils in Italy, 2001–2100: Potential for compost amendment , 2012 .

[37]  Martin Körschens,et al.  Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-term experiments using RothC-26.3 , 1997 .