Evaluation of CO2 and Nd:YAG Lasers for the Selective Laser Sintering of HAPEX®

Abstract This paper evaluates and compares the performance of a CO2 and Nd:YAG laser for the selective laser sintering (SLS) of a commercial hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene (HA-HDPE) bioactive ceramic polymer composite material. Single-line and layer specimens were produced to compare the effects of different lasers on the material sintering. It was found that the processing window was much larger for the CO2 laser as compared to the Nd:YAG laser. Furthermore, the Nd:YAG processing window was highly dependent on the pulse width and pulse repetition rate parameter settings. Furthermore, the processing windows for both the laser systems were affected by the particle size of the HA-HDPE powders. The degree and mechanism of particle fusion existing in the composites layers were greatly influenced by the laser source and particle size. The results presented in this work clearly indicate that the CO2 laser would present a better performance than the Nd:YAG laser for the SLS of HAPEX® in terms of operation range, speed, processing efficiency, and, subsequently, greater potential as an SLS processing method for bioactive implant products.

[1]  Phill Dickens,et al.  Investigation of fully dense laser sintering of tool steel powder using a pulsed Nd: Yag (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser , 2003 .

[2]  L. Froyen,et al.  Comparison between CO2 and NG: YAG lasers for use with selective laser sintering of Steel-Copper powders , 1998 .

[3]  K. Leong,et al.  Scaffold development using selective laser sintering of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite biocomposite blends. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[4]  L. Froyen,et al.  Selective laser melting of iron-based powder , 2004 .

[5]  Ming-Chuan Leu,et al.  Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping , 1998 .

[6]  C K Chua,et al.  Fabrication of porous polymeric matrix drug delivery devices using the selective laser sintering technique , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  T. Gill,et al.  Experimental investigation into the selective laser sintering of silicon carbide polyamide composites , 2004 .

[8]  Carl Deckard,et al.  Advances in modeling the effects of selected parameters on the SLS process , 1998 .

[9]  W. Bonfield,et al.  Processing, characterisation, and evaluation of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene composites , 1994 .

[10]  Yu. V. Khlopkov,et al.  Absorptance of powder materials suitable for laser sintering , 2000 .

[11]  L. Froyen,et al.  Binding Mechanisms in Selective Laser Sintering and Selective Laser Melting , 2004 .

[12]  R. Joseph,et al.  Effect of particle morphology and polyethylene molecular weight on the fracture toughness of hydroxyapatite reinforced polyethylene composite , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[13]  W. Steen.  Laser Material Processing , 1991 .

[14]  Christopher J. Sutcliffe,et al.  Experimental investigation of nanosecond pulsed Nd:YAG laser re‐melted pre‐placed powder beds , 2001 .

[15]  L. Froyen,et al.  Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering , 2002 .

[16]  David L. Bourell,et al.  Selective laser sintering of metals and ceramics , 1992 .

[17]  Abdolreza Simchi,et al.  The role of particle size on the laser sintering of iron powder , 2004 .

[18]  I. Ward,et al.  Hydrostatic extrusion of hydroxyapatite polyethylene composite , 1996 .